THE LIMITS OF LOGICAL EMPIRICISM

SELECTED PAPERS OF ARTHUR PAP

  • ALFONS KEUPINK
  • SANFORD SHIEH
Book

Part of the SYNTHESE LIBRARY book series (SYLI, volume 334)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages I-XIII
  2. THEMES IN PAP’S PHILOSOPHICAL WRITINGS

    1. Front Matter
      Pages I-XIII
    2. SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 3-43
  3. ANALYTICITY, A PRIORITY AND NECESSITY

    1. Front Matter
      Pages I-XIII
    2. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 47-55
    3. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 57-75
    4. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 77-90
    5. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 91-108
    6. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 109-143
  4. SEMANTIC ANALYSIS: TRUTH, PROPOSITIONS, AND REALISM

    1. Front Matter
      Pages I-XIII
    2. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 155-164
    3. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 165-179
    4. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 181-193
  5. PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND MATHEMATICS

    1. Front Matter
      Pages I-XIII
    2. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 197-204
    3. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 205-212
    4. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 213-232
    5. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 233-236
    6. ALFONS KEUPINK, SANFORD SHIEH
      Pages 237-241

About this book

Introduction

This volume brings together a selection of the most philosophically significant papers of Arthur Pap. As Sanford Shieh explains in the Introduction to this volume, Pap’s work played an important role in the development of the analytic tradition. This role goes beyond the merely historical fact that Pap’s views of dispositional and modal concepts were influential. As a sympathetic critic of logical empiricism, Pap, like Quine, saw a deep tension in logical empiricism at its very best, in the work of Carnap. But Pap’s critique of Carnap is quite different from Quine’s, and represents the discovery of limits beyond which empiricism cannot go, where there lies nothing other than intuitive knowledge of logic itself. Pap’s arguments for this intuitive knowledge anticipate Etchemendy’s recent critique of the model-theoretic account of logical consequence. Pap’s work also anticipates prominent developments in the contemporary neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics championed by Wright and Hale. Finally, Pap’s major philosophical preoccupation, the concepts of necessity and possibility, provides distinctive solutions and perspectives on issues of contemporary concern in the metaphysics of modality. In particular, Pap’s account of modality allows us to see the significance of Kripke’s well-known arguments on necessity and apriority in a new light.

This volume will be of interest to all researchers in the philosophical history of the analytic tradition, in philosophy of logic, philosophy of mathematics, and contemporary analytic metaphysics.

Keywords

Proposition Rudolf Carnap dispositions interpret knowledge logic logical consequence logical empiricism logicism metaphysics modality philosophy reduction science truth

Editors and affiliations

  • ALFONS KEUPINK
    • 1
  • SANFORD SHIEH
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Wesleyan UniversityMiddletownU.S.A.

Bibliographic information