Skip to main content

Population Change and Rural Society

  • Book
  • © 2006

Overview

  • A unique focus on rural demography and the interaction between population dynamics and local social and economic change.
  • All chapters report original research by acknowledged experts in rural social science
  • Interdisciplinary and multi-regional
  • Organized around four critical themes illustrated by multiple case studies
  • The first volume on rural population that exploits data from Census 2000

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis (PSDE, volume 16)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (20 chapters)

  1. Case Studies of Population and Society in Different Rural Regions

  2. New Analytic Directions and Policy Implications

Keywords

About this book

CALVIN L. BEALE In considering how to introduce the subject of rural population change in st the 21 Century, I ?nd myself re?ecting on my own experience as a demographer for the U. S. Department of Agriculture. When I arrived at the Department, the post-World War II modernization of farming was well under way. Each year, my colleague Gladys Bowles and I had the unpopular task of announcing how much the farm population had decreased in the prior year. It was hard to say that the phenomenon was someone’s fault. Dramatic reductions in labor requirements per unit of agricultural output were occurring everywhere and not just in the United States. But politically, blame had to be assigned, and whichever political party was not in the White House was certain to place the blame squarely on the current administration. The demographic consequences of this trend were major. In a 22-year period from 1941 to 1962, the net loss of farm population from migration and cessation of farming averaged over a million people per year. It took eight years after the war before an administration was willing to begin to talk about the need to diversify rural employment. By that time, farm residents had already become a minority of rural people. However, well into the 1970s, I continued to receive inquiries from people who still equated rural with farm or who could not envision what rural-nonfarm people did for a living.

Editors and Affiliations

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, USA

    William A. Kandel

  • Department of Development Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA

    David L. Brown

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us