Abstract
Present-day society calls for new student-centred didactic methodologies that make the student an active participant in their learning process. Strategies aimed at training citizens and professionals must adapt and respond to a society that is constantly changing. In this context, self-regulated learning and educational co-design emerge as key concepts in the development of new educational approaches. The present study seeks to identify the elements shared by models of self-regulation and educational co-design in technology-enhanced learning environments. To this end, a systematic review of the scientific literature during the period 2014-2019 has been conducted. The search was carried out using five databases: (1) Ebsco Host; (2) Web of Science; (3) Scopus; (4) ERIC; (5) Dialnet. A total of 830 references and 21 papers meeting the criteria for inclusion were identified. An analysis of the studies selected enabled us to identify the self-regulation models associated with co-design learning processes, as well as the elements they have in common. These include planning, motivation, cognition, task management, collaboration, and degree of success. The results provide the first steps for the construction of a co-design model, which includes guidelines for the creation of personalised learning pathways in technology-enhanced environments.
Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abdelraheem, A., & Asan, A. (2006). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Technology Enhanced Collaborative Learning Environment. Int. J. Technol Teach Learn, 2.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Bain, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2009). Understanding Great Teaching. Peer Review, 11(2).
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Albert Bandura and the Exercise of Self-Efficacy. Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 13(2).
Barbera, E., Garcia, I., & Fuertes-Alpiste, M. (2017). A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2805
Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_4
Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated Learning at the Junction of Cognition and Motivation. European Psychologist, 1(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Celuch, K., Bacic, D., Chen, M., Maier-Lytle, J., & Smothers, J. (2018). The Potential of Student Co-Creation in Extracurricular Experiences. Marketing Education Review, 3, 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2017.1419432
Cortada-Pujol, M., López, M., Marimon, M., Gros, B., Creus, A., Estruch, A., … Pastor, X. (2014). Diseño de escenarios de aprendizaje basados en la indagación con soporte tecnológico. Estrategias de co-diseño entre docentes e investigadores. Revista del CIDUI, 2. Retrieved from https://www.cidui.org/revistacidui/index.php/cidui/article/view/506
Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2015). Teachers as co-designers of technology-rich learning activities for early literacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2014.953197
Dural, E., Bauters, M., Hietala, I., Leinonen, T., & Kapros, E. (2020). Co-creation and co-design in technology enhanced learning: Innovating science learning outside the classroom. . Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 42, 202–226. Retrieved from https://url2.cl/Tf517
Freeman, A., Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Davis, A. (2017). Resumen Informe Horizon. Educación Primaria y Secundaria, 2017, 0–23.
Garcia, I., Noguera, I., & Cortada-Pujol, M. (2018). Students’ perspective on participation in a co-design process of learning scenarios. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v4i1.760
González, A., Escofet, A., Obiols, N., & Masgrau, M. (2016). Learning service and codesign in teacher training: integration ways of students’ experiences and perspectives. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 68(2), 169–169. https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2016.68211
González-Yebra, O., Aguilar, M. A., Aguilar, F., & Lucas, M. (2019). Co-Design of a 3D Virtual Campus for Synchronous Distance Teaching Based on Student Satisfaction: Experience at the University of Almería (Spain). Education Sciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010021
Gros, B. (2019). La investigación sobre el diseño participativo de entornos digitales de aprendizaje. Retrieved from https://url2.cl/WA2bv
Hannon, D., Danahi, E., Schneider, L., Coopey, E., & Garber, G. (2012). Encouraging teachers to adopt Inquiry bades learning by engaging in participatory design. Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) 2012 IEEE 2nd (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2012.6204169
Higgins, D., Dennis, A., Stoddard, A., Maier, A. G., & Howitt, S. (2019). ‘Power to empower’: conceptions of teaching and learning in a pedagogical co-design partnership. Higher Education Research & Development, 38, 1154–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1621270
Hutton, B., Catalá-López, F., & Moher, D. (2016). La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA. Medicina Clínica, 147(6), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025
Hyysalo, S., Perikangas, S., Marttila, T., & Auvinen, K. (2019). Intermediate Codesigning in Transitions Governance: Catalysing and Channelling Participant Action. The Design Journal, 22(6), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1661557
Janssen, F. J. J. M., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Participatory educational design: How to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? European Journal of Education, 52(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12229
Järvelä, S. (2015). El papel de la investigación sobre aprendizaje autorregulado en el desarrollo del aprendizaje colaborativo asistido por ordenador. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38(2), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1016747
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The Teacher as Designer: Pedagogy in the New Media Age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. (2017). Reframing Student Success in College: Advancing Know-What and Know-How. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(3), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1321429
Könings, K. D., Seidel, T., & Merriënboer, J. J. G. V. (2014). Participatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instructional Science, 42(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9305-2
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact Educational Practices. HIgh-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Assn of Amer Colleges.
Leinonen, T., & Durall-Gazulla, E. (2014). Design thinking and collaborative learning. Comunicar, 21(42), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-10
Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning. ELearning Papers, 42, 38–45. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1428569
Magolda, M. B. B., & Astin, A. W. (1993). What “Doesn’t” Matter in College?What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. Educational Researcher, 22(8), 32–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176821
Manso, M., & Llamas, M. (2015). A Monitoring System to Ease Self-Regulated Learning Processes. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 10(2).
Marcelo, C., & Rijo, D. (2019). Aprendizaje autorregulado de estudiantes universitarios: Los usos de las tecnologías digitales. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa (RECIE), 3(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2019.v3i1.pp62-81
Mccombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: a phenomenological view. Nueva York: Springer-verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_3
Mor, Y., & Craft, B. (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196
Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12273
Moreno, B., Muñoz, M., Cuellar, J., Domancic, S., & Villanueva, J. (2018). Revisiones Sistemáticas: definición y nociones básicas. Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral, 11(3), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0719-01072018000300184
OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264276284-en https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? Revisión del modelo cíclico de Zimmerman sobre autorregulación del aprendiza-je. Anales de Psicologia, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
Pastor, X., Lozano, R., & Gros, B. (2017). El aprendizaje basado en la indagación y el codiseño experiencia aplicada. Experiencia aplicada en el Grado de Ingeniería Biomédica. Barcelona: Octaedro. Retrieved from https://url2.cl/J2Wc7
Penuel, W. R. (2019). Infrastructuring as a Practice of Design-Based Research for Supporting and Studying Equitable Implementation and Sustainability of Innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4-5), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1552151
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Shechtman, N. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences, 606–612.
Rotar, L. J., & Kozar, M. (2017). The Use of the Kano Model to Enhance Customer Satisfaction. Organizacija, 50(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0025
Steffens, K., Bannan, B., Dalgarno, B., Bartolomé, A. R., Esteve-González, V., & Cela-Ranilla, J. M. (2015). Avances en el aprendizaje enriquecido con la tecnología: Una evaluación enriquecida. RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2453
Trischler, J., Pervan, S. J., Kelly, S. J., & Scott, D. R. (2018). The Value of Codesign: The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 75–100.
Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clínica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015
Wareing, L., Rodgers, P. A., & Dunn, N. (2019). Co-designing Pathways to Opportunities for Young People in the North West of England. The Design Journal, 22, 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595405
Weitze, C. L. (2015). Learning and Motivational Processes When Students Design Curriculum-Based Digital Learning Games. Proceedings of The 9th European Conference on Games Based Learning : ECGBL 2015, 579–588.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The educational psychology series. Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yu, E., & Sangiorgi, D. (2018). Service Design as an Approach to Implement the Value Cocreation Perspective in New Service Development. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517709356
Zahedi, M., & Heaton, L. (2017). A Model of Framing in Design Teams. Design And Technology Education. An International Journal, 22(2), 8–25.
Zhao, H. (2016). Factors Influencing Self-Regulation in E-learning 2.0: Confirmatory Factor Model. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21432/T2C33K
Zheng, L. (2015). A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0036-z
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis. Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning. Theory, research and applications (pp. 267–295). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-Regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Villatoro Moral, S., de Benito, B. An Approach to Co-Design and Self-Regulated Learning in Technological Environments. Systematic Review. J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 10, 234–250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.646