Abstract
The distinction between face-to-face and distant digitally-mediated educational engagement is a complex one, and the two modes are often combined in practice, via ‘blended learning’ or the use of a VLE to support campus-based teaching. The current Covid-19 pandemic has thrown this distinction into relief, in a context where educationalists have been forced to move to fully distant engagement in a very short timeframe. This paper explores how this predicament has brought to the fore the nature of our engagement with digital knowledge practices and screen-based communication, arguing that the notion of ‘virtual learning’ is a flawed one. Instead, adopting a sociomaterial perspective, it argues that all aspects of digital engagement are in fact grounded in material and embodied entanglements with devices and other artefacts.
Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acton, R. (2017). Place-people-practice-process: Using sociomateriality in university physical spaces research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(14), 1441–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1309637
Adams, C., & Thompson, T. (2016). Researching a Posthuman World: Interviews with Digital Objects. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57162-5
Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces. E-learning, 1(2), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2004.1.2.6
Bayne, S., Gallagher, M. S., & Lamb, J. (2014). Being ‘at’ university: the social topologies of distance students. Higher Education, 67(5), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9662-4
Edwards, R., Tracy, F., & Jordan, K. (2011). Mobilities, moorings and boundary marking in developing semantic technologies in educational practices. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 219–232.
Enriquez, J. (2011). Tug-o-where: situating mobilities learning (t)here. Learning. Media and Technology, 36(1), 39–53.
Enriquez, J. (2013). Being(t)here: mobilising ‘mediaspaces’ of learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.685744
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Sociomaterial. Routledge.
Gourlay, L. (2020a). Posthumanism and the Digital University: Texts, Bodies and Materialities. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350038202
Gourlay, L. (2020b). Quarantined, sequestered, closed: theorising academic bodies under Covid-19 lockdown. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00193-6
Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2018). Student engagement in the digital university: Sociomaterial assemblages.. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647524
Hamilton, E., & Friesen, N. (2013). Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective / Éducation en ligne: Perspective des études en science et technologie. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2001C
Hayles, K. (2002). Writing Machines. MIT University Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7328.001.0001
Kirchenbaum, M. (2012). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. MIT University Press.
Land, R. (2005). Embodiment and risk in cyberspace education. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in Cyberspace (pp. 149–164). Routledge.
Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(5), 609–621. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1068/d243t10.1068/d243t
Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2012). Rereading ’a pedagogy of multiliteracies’: bodies, texts and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468587
Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400402
Press, C. U., & Cambridge Online Dictionary. (2020). Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is Technology Good for Education? Polity.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Taylor, C. (2009). Towards a geography of education. Oxford Review of Education, 5(5), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980903216358
Thibodeau, K. (2002). Overview of technical approaches to digital preservation and challenges in the coming years. The State of Digital Preservation: An International Perspective. Retrieved from https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub107/thibodeau/
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gourlay, L. There Is No ‘Virtual Learning’: The Materiality of Digital Education. J. New Approaches Educ. Res. 10, 57–66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.649
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.649