Philosophy of Management

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 85–101 | Cite as

Managerial and Philosophical Intuition in the Thinking of Bergson and Mintzberg

  • Ghislain Deslandes


Within the Configuration school the management author Henry Mintzberg contributed a strong criticism of a normative conception of strategic planning, arguing that this is too narrow. The philosopher Henri Bergson embraced the totality of life as a creative evolution which transcends the fullness of a preconceived idea. While Mintzberg attempts to rethink the concept of strategy and Bergson to renew philosophical thought, together they share a vision of a changing and unpredictable world that enables them to discover — above and beyond the systematic data they are able to assemble — another mode of knowledge formed by intuition. Intuition holds a central place in the work of both thinkers, invigorating Mintzberg’s work on strategy and Bergson’s thought on metaphysics through a grasp of the substantiality of change. In this paper, we explore the implications of the concept of intuition for their ideas, then discuss some of its limitations, before investigating its possible applications for management research.


Management Research Harvard Business Review Management Executive Creative Evolution Managerial Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Translator’s note: The quotations in the article are taken from published sources, except when the Englishlanguage original could not be located. In these instances, an original translation has been provided. The references in the text and in the bibliography are to the works consulted by the author. 86Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas S. Issack ‘Intuition: An Ignored Dimension of Management’ Academy of Management Review 1978 pp 917–921.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Claire Peugeot-Petitmengin L’intuition: un autre mode de cognition, Congrès Européen de Systémique 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See Katharine Winifred Wild Intuition, Cambridge University Press 1938 for a selection of meanings proposed by philosophers, psychologists and phenomenologists.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carl Jung Psychological types Harcourt 1924Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weston H Agor Intuition in Organizations: Leading and Managing Productively, Sage Publications 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    (James, 1950).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alden G Lank, Elisabeth A Lank ‘Legitimizing the Gut Feel: the Role of Intuition in Business’ Journal of Managerial Psychology 10(5) MCB University Press 1995 pp 18–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erik Dane, Michael G. Pratt ‘Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making’ Academy of Management Review 32 1 2007 pp 33–54.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stephen Leybourne Eugene Sadler-Smith ‘The role of intuition and improvisation in project management’ International Journal of Project Management 24 2006 pp 483–492.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orlando Behling, Norman L Eckel ‘Making Sense Out of Intuition’ Academy of Management Executive 5(1) 1991 pp 46–54.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erik Dane, Michael G. Pratt, ibid.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seymour Epstein, Rosemary Pacini, Veronika Denes-Raj, Harriet Heier, ‘Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-reasoning thinking styles’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (2) 1996 pp 390–405.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lisa A Burke, Monica K Miller ‘Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision-making’ Academy of Management Executive 13 (4) 1999 pp 91–99.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christopher W. Allison, Elisabeth Chell, John Hayes, ‘Intuition and Entrepreneurial Behaviour’ European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9(1) 2000 pp 31–43.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jon-Aarum Andersen ‘Intuition in managers: Are Intuitive Managers More Effective ?’ Journal of Managerial Psychology, MCB University Press 15 no1 2000 pp. 46–67.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warren J. Keegan Judgements, Choices and Decisions Wiley 1984.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alden G Lank, Elisabeth A Lank op. cit. pp 18–2.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erik Dane, Michael G. Pratt op. cit. pp 33–54. Stephen Leybourne Eugene Sadler-Smith op. cit. pp 483–492.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henri Mintzberg Le management voyage au centre des organisations, Les Editions d’organisation 1990Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robert Evan Ornstein The Psychology of Consciousness, J. Cape 1975.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Michel Barabel ‘Henri Mintzberg: une lecture du changement par les configurations organisationnelles’ in: Les Grands Auteurs en Management ema 2002 p 137.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    In his article ‘A New Look at the Chief Executive’s Job’, Mintzberg notes that ‘there is no science in managerial work … That is to say, managers do not work according procedures that have been prescribed by scientific analysis … He may take decisions dealing with modern technology, but he uses the same intuitive (that is, non explicit) procedures in making them … Hence, despite all the talk about management science and despite all our investment in business school education, we must admit that we cannot really teach the essence of management. The job remains in the realm of intuitive thinking’ Henri Mintzberg ‘A New Look at the Chief Executive’s Job’ Organizational Dynamics 1 Issue 3 1973 pp 20–30.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chester Irving Barnard The functions of the executive, Harvard University Press 1938.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    James March Herbert Simon Organizations 2nd Ed, Cambridge 1993.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ‘I was wholly persuaded, however, that a theory of decision making had to give an account of both conscious and subconscious process’, Herbert Simon ‘Making Management Decisions: The Role of Intuition and Emotion Academy of Management Executive 1(1) 1987p 58.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    ibid. p 61.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ibid. p 83.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andrew Campbell ‘Brief Case: Strategy and Intuition — A Conversation with Henri Mintzberg’ Long Range Planning 24(2) 1991 p 109.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Henri Mintzberg 1990 p 65.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ‘Truly outstanding managers are no doubt the ones who can couple effective right-hemispheric processes (hunch, judgment, synthesis, and so on) with effective processes of the left (articulateness, logic, analysis, and so on)’ Henri Mintzberg ‘Planning on the Left Side and Managing on the Right’ Harvard Business Review 54(4) 1976 pp 49–58; ‘Therefore, I suggest the following hypothesis: the key management processes of an organization appear to operate largely from the right hemisphere of the brain Henri Mintzberg ibid. p 80.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Michel Barabel ‘Henri Mintzberg: une lecture du changement par les configurations organisationnelles’ in: Les Grands Auteurs en Management ems 2002 p 137.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Henri Mintzberg ‘Le manager, le planificateur et le cerveau’ Revue Internationale de Gestion 1976 pp 4–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stephen Linstead ‘Organization as Reply: Henri Bergson and Casual Organization Theory’ Organization 9(1) 2002 pp 95–111, p 108.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Martin Wood ‘Mind the Gap ? A processual reconsideration of organizational knowledge innovation Organization 9(1) 2002 pp 151–171.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    With particular reference to Michel Barthod’s remarks in regard to his position as an executive director with Salomons.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roland Calori ‘Organizational development and the ontology of creative dialectical evolution’ Organization 9(1) 2002 pp 127–150.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hugo Letiche ‘Phenomenal Complexity Theory as Informed by Bergson Journal of Organisational Change Management 13(6) 2000 pp 545–557.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Issack op. cit. pp 917–921.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alexandre Styhre ‘Bergson, the Virtual and the ‘Virtual Organization”, Academy of Management Proceedings 2006 pp 1–24.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Henri Bergson Matière et mémoire, PUF 1965.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stephen Linstead John Mullarkey ‘Time, Creativity and Culture: Introducing Bergson’ Culture &Organization9(1) 2003 pp 3–11.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ajit Nayak (2008) ‘On the Way to Theory: A Processual Approach’, Organization Studies 29(2) 2008 pp 173–190.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Robert Chia, Haridimos Tsoukas ‘On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change’ Organization Science 13(5) 2002 pp 567–582.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Henri Bergson L’évolution créatrice, collection Quadrige PUF 1986 first edition 1907 p 267.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    ibid. p 268.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jean-Louis Veillard-Baron Bergson, Que sais-je ? PUF 1991.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gilles Deleuze Le Bergsonisme, collection Quadrige PUF 2007 first edition 1966.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    ibid. p 10.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    ibid. p 10.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Henri Bergson La pensée et le mouvant, collection Quadrige PUF 2006 first edition 1938.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vladimir Jankélévitch Henri Bergson, collection Quadrige PUF 1989 first edition 1959 p 218.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Henri Bergson op. cit. p 101.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Henry Mintzberg, Grandeur et décadence de la planification stratégique traduit de l’américain par Pierre Romelaer, Dunod 1999 p 333.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Henri Mintzberg 1990 p 53.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bergson recognizes his mark in an ability to produce an ‘instantaneous vision’: ‘The greater share of the past that he includes in his present, the heavier the mass he pushes into the future so as to weigh on events in preparation: his action, like an arrow, moves forward with a strength proportional to that with which its representation was bent backwards’ Henri Bergson Lénergie spirituelle, collection Quadrige PUF 1999 first edition 1919 p 15.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yvon Pesqueux, Bernard Ramanantsoa, Alain Saudan et Jean-Claude Tournand Mercure et Minerve Perspectives philosophiques sur l’entreprise, Ellipses 1999.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Henry Mintzberg, 1999 p 37.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Henri BergsonL’évolution créatrice, collection Quadrige PUF 1986 first edition 1907 p 268.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jonathan Gosling Henry Mintzberg ‘The Five Minds of a Manager’ Harvard Business Review 81(11) 2003 pp 54–63.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Vladimir Jankélévitch op. cit. p 67.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Henri Bergson La pensée et le mouvant, p 67.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Henri Bergson 1907 p 268.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Henri Mintzberg Le manager au quotidien: les dix rôles du cadre translated by Pierre Romelaer, Editions d’organisation 1984.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    ‘The manager frees some time to do the things that he or she — perhaps no one else — considers important (…). Free time is made, not found. Hoping to leave some time open for contemplation or general planning is tantamount to hoping that the pressures of the job will go away’ Orlando Behling, Norman L Eckel ‘Making Sense Out of Intuition’ Academy of Management Executive 5(1) 1991 pp 45Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Henry Mintzberg, 1999 p 298.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Henri Bergson 1938 p 173.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Henri Mintzberg 1990 p 82; according to Mintzberg the diversity of a manager’s roles creates a gestalt, ‘an integrated whole’ p 45.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    ‘We need a new structure that encouraged synthesis rather than separation’ Jonathan Gosling, Henry Mintzberg ‘The Five Minds of a Manager’ Harvard Business Review 81(11) 2003 pp 54–63.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    ’…the chief executives I studied supervised as many as fifty of these projects at the same time. (…). Like a juggler, they seemed to keep a number of projects in the air; periodically, one comes down, is given a new burst of energy and is sent back into orbit. At various intervals, they put new projects onstream and discard old ones’ Henri Mintzberg Le management voyage au centre des organisations, Les Editions d’organisation 1990 pp 38–39.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Henri Mintzberg 1990 pp 61–62.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Henri Bergson 1938 p 101.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    ‘The evolution of the organized world is the unrolling of this conflict’ Henri Bergson L’évolution créatrice, collection Quadrige PUF 1986 first edition 1907 pp 254–255.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Henri Bergson 1907 p 264.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vladimir Jankélévitch op. cit. p 211. Jankelevitch elsewhere also points out that ‘this immanentist conception of freedom does not remove from the decision its exceptional value as a beginning’ (p. 75).Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    ‘We are wrong to believe that the true and false can only be brought to bear on solutions, that they only begin with solutions’, says Deleuze. ‘This prejudice is social (for society, and the language that transmits its rallying cries, gives us ready-made problems, as if they were being pulled out of the city’s ‘administrative records’ and demands that we solve them, leaving us only a thin margin of freedom)’ Deleuze Le Bergsonisme, collection Quadrige PUF 2007 first edition 1966 p 3.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Henri Bergson 1938 p 51.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bruce Ahlastrand, Joseph Lampel, Henry Mintzberg Safari en pays stratégie, l’exploration des grands courants de lapensée stratégique Village Mondial 1999.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Henri Mintzberg Le pouvoir dans les organisations, Les éditions d’organisation 1986.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Dane and Pratt op. cit.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    History of Western Philosophy, George Allen & Unwin, 2nd edition, 1961, pp 756–757.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    L’évolution créatrice, 1907, p 264.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Leybourne and Sadler-Smith, op. cit.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nayak op. cit.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Stephen Linstead ‘Organization as reply’ p 108.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    In 1831 Lamartine would write ‘Le livre arrive trop tard; le seul livre possible dès aujourd’hui, c’est un journal.’ ‘The book arrives too late; the only possible publication today is the newspaper’ [translator’s note].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghislain Deslandes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations