Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 59–63 | Cite as

The Comprehensive Application of Behavior Analysis to Schooling (CABAS®)

  • R. Douglas GreerEmail author


Using a university-based training model, CABAS provides teacher training, supervisory support and administrative support to implement a system or school-wide program for students with various disabilities including visual impairment, mild to profound mental retardation, autism, learning disabilities, and emotional disturbances and has also been used to mainstream students. CABAS-trained teachers provide academic instruction and classroom behavior management based on a combination of technologies developed through scientific research in applied behavior analysis. These technologies include Direct Instruction, Precision Teaching, and PSI (Personalized System of Instruction) for staff and parent training. Instruction is individualized and based on measurable objectives. Supervisors provide teacher training and assist with data collect in the classroom. Teaching is adjusted as needed based on student performance. In a range of studies over 15 years, CABAS students made greater gains than non-CABAS students with smaller special education placement and significant cost reductions.


  1. Albers, A. E., & Greer, R. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337–354. Scholar
  2. Cotton, K., & Savard, W. G. (1980). The principal as instructional leader. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  3. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–27.Google Scholar
  4. Englemann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  5. Greer, R. D. (1994a). A systems analysis of the behaviors of schooling.. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 255–264. Scholar
  6. Greer, R. D. (1994b). The measure of a teacher. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainata, I. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eschelman, & T. A. Grossi, (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 325–335). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
  7. Greer, R. D. (1996). The education crisis. In M. A. Mattaini & 8. A. Thyer (Eds.), Finding solutions to social problems: Behavioral strategies for change. (pp. 113–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greer, R. D., McCorkle, N. P., & Williams, G. (1989). A sustained analysis of the behaviors of schooling. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 4, 113–14I.Google Scholar
  9. Ingham, P., & Greer, R. D. (1992). Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153–164. Scholar
  10. Keller, F. S. (1968). Goodbye Teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89. Scholar
  11. Lamm, N., & Greer, R. D. (1991). A systematic replication and a comparative analysis of CABAS ®. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 427–444. Scholar
  12. Lindsley, O. R. (1990). Precision teaching: By teachers for children. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Selinske, J. E., Greer, R. D., & Lodhi, S. (1991). A functional analysis of the comprehensive application of behavior analysis to schooling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 107–117. Scholar
  14. Skinner, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39, 947–954. Scholar
  15. Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9, 11–16. Scholar
  16. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1986). Achieving educational excellence with behavioral strategies. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia University Teachers CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations