Abstract
The use of rating scales rather than direct observation procedures to identify various behavior problems is a popular trend in the public school system. We compared a popular rating scale with a direct observation system to measure “hyperactive behaviors” in a classroom setting. The subjects were 30 seventh grade students chosen at random from heterogeneously grouped students at a public middle school. A Pearson product-moment correlation was used to determine the magnitude and direction of the correlation between the data obtained by way of direct observations and the rating scale. Reliability coefficients were obtained, and a regression equation and coefficient of determination were calculated. A statistically significant but relatively low correlation was obtained between behaviors recorded by way of the direct observation instrument and the behavior rating scale. Interestingly, a strong negative correlation was found between the level of hyperactivity obtained on the rating scale and the rating scale reliability coefficients.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alessi, G. I., & Kaye, J. H. (1983). Behavioral assessment for school psychologists. Stratford, CT: NASP Publications.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist & Revised Child Profiles. New York: Queen City Publishers.
Achenbach, T.M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213
Barkley, R. A. (1987). Defiant children: A clinician’s manual for parent training. New York: Guilford.
Braaten, S., & Merbler, J.B. (1998). Behavioral Objective Sequence Software [Computer Software]. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Broussard, C., & Northup, J. (1995). An approach to functional assessment and analysis of disruptive behavior in regular education classrooms. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 151–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0088301
Broussard, C., & Northup, J. (1997). The use of functional analysis to develop peer interventions for disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 65–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0088948
Cooper, L.J., Wacker, D.P., Sasso, G., Reimers, T.M., & Donn, L.K. (1990). Using parents as therapists to evaluate appropriate behavior of their children: Application to a tertiary diagnostic clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 283–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-285
Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F.R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, & severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-387
Elliot, S.N., Busse, R.T., & Gresham, F.M. (1993). Behavior rating scales: Issues of use and development. School Psychology Review, 22, 313–320.
Gresham, F. & Elliot, S. (1990). Social Skills Rating System Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.
Guilford, J.P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Hinshaw, S. P. (1987). On the distinction between attentional deficits/hyperactivity and conduct problems/aggression in child psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 443–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.3.443
Horner, R. H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 401–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-401
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, D. E., Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).
Katz, E.R., Kellerman, J., & Siegel, S.E. (1980). Behavioral distress in children with cancer undergoing medical procedures: Developmental considerations. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 48, 356–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.48.3.356
Keogh, B. K., & Bernheimer, L. P. (1998). Concordance between mothers’ and teachers’ perceptions of behavior problems of children with developmental delays. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 33–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106342669800600103
Knoff, H.M. (1995). Best practices in personality asessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 849–864). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Lahey, B.B., Pelham, W. E., Schaughency, E. A., Atkins, M.S., Murphy, A., Hynd, G.W., Russo, M., Hartdagan, S., & Lorys-Vernon, A. (1988). Dimensions and types of attention deficit disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 330–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198805000-00011
Lett, N.J., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1992, August). Validity of the BASC teacher rating scale by the BASC student observation scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Martin, S. (1993). !OBSERVE FAST [Computer Software]. Denton, TX: Psychsoft, Inc.
McCarney, S.B. (1995). The Attention Deficit Disorders Evaluation Scale. Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Press.
McConaughy, S.H., & Ritter, D.R. (1995). Best practices in multidimensional assessment of emotional or behavioral disorders, Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 865–877). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Ninness, H. A. C., McCuller, G. & Ninness, S. K. (1999). The functional analysis in behavioral and school psychology: Toward a four-term contingency. In D.A. Sadatino & B.L. Brooks (Eds.), Contemporary interdisciplinary interventions for children with emotional/behavioral disorders (pp. 505–531). Durham NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Ninness, H. A. C., Glenn, S., & Ellis, J. (1993) Assessment in treatment of emotional or behavioral disorders. Westport, CT: Prager Publishers.
Ninness, H. A. C., McCuller, G., & Ozenne, L. (2000). Behavioral school psychology: Applied research in human-computer interactive, functional assessment, and treatment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ninness, H. A. C. (1999). https://doi.org/www.lcsdg.com/psychStats (Computer software). Nacogdoches, TX: LCS Development Group, LLC.
Quay, H.C., & Peterson, D.R. (1983). Interim manual of the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Miami, FL: Authors.
Quay, H.C., & Peterson, D.R. (1987). Manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Odessa, FL: PAR, Inc.
Reynolds, C.R. & Kamphaus, R.W. (1998). Behavior Assessment System for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Ross, D. M., & Ross, S.A. (1982). Hyperactivity: Current issues, research, and theory (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E., (1995). Assessment (6th ed). Boston Houghton Mifflin
Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of Children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywtz, B.A. (1988). Attention deficit disorder: Current perspectives. In J. F. Kavanagh & T. J. Truss (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Proceedings of the national conference. Parkton, MK: York.
Simpson, R. (1989–1990). Review of the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Diagnostique, 15, 161–173.
Simpson, R. (1991). Agreement among teachers using the Behavior Problem Checklist to identify deviant behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 66–71.
Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Whalen, C. K., & Henker, B (Eds.). (1976). Hyperactive children: The social ecology of identification and treatment. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was originally published in Volume 12; due to a production error, however, one figure was missing, and another printed twice. These errors are corrected in this version.
This research was conducted as part of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in School Psychology at Stephen F. Austin State University, 2000.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kenney, M., Ninness, C., Rumph, R. et al. Paradoxical Patterns in the Measurement of Hyperactivity. Behav. Soc. Iss. 13, 69–82 (2004). https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i1.36
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i1.36