Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 141–148 | Cite as

Reforming Welfare Reform

  • Mark A. MattainiEmail author
Article

Abstract

The United States is currently engaged in a wide-scale social experiment: the dismantling of entitlement programs in the name of welfare reform. While behavior and cultural analysts have been only minimally involved in these efforts, there are many contributions that they might make that could potentially improve aggregate outcomes for everyone involved, including poor children, their parents, and the larger society. Both technical and social justice issues, all embedded in interlocking cultural contingencies, need to be included in an effective analysis. Many current experiments are grounded in rationales inconsistent with the science of behavior, and many are not being adequately evaluated. This paper outlines steps that behavior and cultural analysts could take that could contribute meaningfully to improved sociocultural outcomes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dalaker, J., & Naifeh, M. (1998). Poverty in the United States, 1997, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P60-201. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  3. Dresang, J. (1999, January 14). W-2 families say they’re just getting by. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, pp. 1, 6.Google Scholar
  4. Egan, T. (1998, April 16). In Idaho, the poor fear they will go the way of state’s Democrats. The New York Times on the Web.Google Scholar
  5. Firestone, D. (1996, September 9). Workfare cuts costs but tracking new jobs poses problems. The New York Times, p. Bl.Google Scholar
  6. Gans, H. J. (1995). The war against the poor: The underclass and antipoverty policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Goldiamond, I. (1974). Toward a constructional approach to social problems. Behaviorism, 2, 1–84.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hernandez, R. (1998, March 23). People not going from welfare into jobs, New York survey says. The New York Times on the Web.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, J. (1996, August 12). Monumental callousness. Newsweek, 128, p. 45.Google Scholar
  10. Kohlbert, E. (1997, February 10). Success story under wraps: Welfare study. The New York Times, p. Bl.Google Scholar
  11. Malott, R. W. (1998). Performance management and welfare reform: The three-contingency model of performance management applied to welfare reform. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 109–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v8i2.324Google Scholar
  12. Mattaini, M. A. (1996). Envisioning cultural practices. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mattaini, M. A., & Lowery, C. T. (1998). The science of sharing power: Native American thought and behavior analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  14. Mattaini, M. A., & Magnabosco, J. L. (1997). Reworking welfare: Untangling the web. In P. A-Lamal (Ed.), Cultural contingencies: Behavior analytic perspectives on cultural practices. (pp. 151–167). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Meckler, L. (1999). Declining welfare rolls begin to level off in several states. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, p. 3A.Google Scholar
  16. Nackerud, L., Waller, R. J., Waller, K., & Thyer, B. A. (1997). Behavior analysis and social welfare policy: The example of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Cultural contingencies: Behavior analytic perspectives on cultural practices (pp. 169–184). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Olds, D. (1997). The prenatal early infancy project. In D. A. Wolfe, R. J. McMahon, & R. DeV. Peters (Eds.), Child abuse: New directions in prevention and treatment across the lifespan (pp. 130–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Opulente, M., & Mattaini, M. A. (1993). Toward welfare that works. Behavior and Social Issues, 3, 17–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v3i1.197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanford, F. L., & Fawcett, S. B. (1980). Consequence analysis: Its effects on verbal statements about an enviromental project. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1980.13-57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seekins, T., & Fawcett, S. B. (1986). Public policy-making and research information. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and its fallout. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, D. F. (1987). What is wrong with daily life in the Western world? In B. F. Skinner, Upon further reflection (pp. 15–31). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Originally published in American Psychologist in 1986.)Google Scholar
  23. Swarns, R. L. (1998, April 14). Acute lack of day care hinders shift to workfare. The New York Times on the Web.Google Scholar
  24. Thyer, B. A. (1996). Behavior analysis and social welfare policy. In M. A. Mattaini & B. A. Thyer (Eds.), Finding solutions to social problems: Behavioral strategies for change (pp. 41–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jane Addams College of Social WorkUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations