Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 109–139 | Cite as

Performance Management and Welfare Reform: The Three-Contingency Model of Performance Management Applied to Welfare Reform

  • Richard W. MalottEmail author
Article

Abstract

The three-contingency model of performance management suggests contingencies that could provide an effective basis for welfare reform. This model also suggests an analysis of the performance management contingencies of traditional efforts at welfare reform; and, in turn, that analysis suggests such traditional reform will not effectively increase functional behavior such as job finding nor decrease dysfunctional behavior such as drug abuse. This article is inspired by Nevin’s (1998) analysis of welfare reform.

Key words

welfare rule-governed behavior three-contingency model of performance management direct-acting contingency indirect-acting contingency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, D. M., Peterson, R. F., & Sherman, J. A. (1967). Development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405–415.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Malott, R. W. (1993, October). The three-contingency model applied to performance management in higher education. Educational Technology, 33, 21–28.Google Scholar
  3. Malott, R. W. & Garcia, M. E. (1991). The role of private events in rule-governed behavior. In L. J. Hayes & P. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 237–254). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  4. Malott, R. W., Whaley, D. W., & Malott, M. E., (1997) Elementary principles of behavior (third edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Mower, O. H. (1947). On the dual nature of learning—a reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problem solving.” Harvard Educational Review, 17, 102–148.Google Scholar
  6. Nevin, J. A. (1998). Contingencies of welfare reform. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v8i2.323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations