Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 40–65 | Cite as

A Relational Frame Theory Contribution to Social Categorization

  • Jonathan H. Weinstein
  • Kelly G. Wilson
  • Chad E. Drake
  • Karen Kate Kellum


The purpose of this study was to investigate the transformation of stimulus functions from socially relevant to arbitrary stimuli as a model of social stigmatization and categorization. Specifically, participants were trained to respond to arbitrary stimuli as if they were obese or thin stimuli via a matching-to-sample preparation. The impact of this relational conditioning was tested using the Implicit Association Test. The results showed that when participants met the fluency-based training criterion, the bias functions of obese/thin stimuli successfully transformed formally similar variants of the arbitrary stimuli. These results suggest it is possible to affect a transformation of bias functions to wholly arbitrary stimuli using a very brief conditioning history. A clearer conceptualization of the development of stigmatizing categories, particularly as it applies to obesity, might yield important insights into the social contexts that cultivate and maintain stigmatizing attitudes.


relational frame theory social categorization obesity Implicit Association Test fluency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
  2. Banaji, M. R., Greenwald, A. G., & Rosier, M. R. (1997). Implicit esteem: When collectives shape individuals. Paper presented at the Preconference on Self, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, D., Lawlor, H., Smeets, P. M., & Roche, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and academic self-concept among mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Psychological Record, 46 (1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessenoff, G., & Sherman, J. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329–353. Scholar
  5. Billig, M. & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–52. Scholar
  6. Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H.Tajfel (Ed.) Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 395–429). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Craeynest, M., Crombez, G., De Houwer, J., Deforche, B., Tanghe, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2005). Explicit and implicit attitudes towards food and physical activity in childhood obesity. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 1111–1120. Scholar
  8. Crandall, C. (1991). Do heavy-weight students have more difficulty paying for college? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 606–611.
  9. De Houwer, J. (2003) The Extrinsic Affective Simon Task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77–85. Scholar
  10. Dixon, M. R., Dymond, S., Rehfeldt, R. A., Roche, B., & Zlomke, K. R. (2003). Terrorism and relational frame theory. Behavior and Social Issues, 12, 129–147. Scholar
  11. Dougher, M. J., Auguston, E, Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351. Scholar
  12. Dougher, M., Perkins, D. R., Greenway, D., Koons, A., & Chiasson, C. (2002). Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 63–93. Scholar
  13. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.
  14. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fields, L., & Reeve, K. F. (2001). A methodological integration of generalized equivalenceclasses, natural categories, and cross-modal perception. The Psychological Record, 51, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiske, S.T. (2004). Social Beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & sons.Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (1998). The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Glenn, C. V., & Chow, P. (2002). Measurement of attitudes toward obese people among a Canadian sample of men and women. Psychological Reports, 91, 627–640. Scholar
  19. Gray, N. S., Brown, A. S., MacCulloch, M. J., Smith, J., & Snowden, R. J. (2005). An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 304–308. Scholar
  20. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25. Scholar
  21. Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038. Scholar
  22. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 74, 1464–1480. Scholar
  23. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. Scholar
  24. Guerin, B. (2005). Combating everyday racial discrimination without assuming “racists” or “racism”: New intervention ideas from a contextual analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 14(1), 46–70. Scholar
  25. Hayes, S.C. (1984). Making sense of spirituality. Behaviorism, 12, 99–110.Google Scholar
  26. Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392. Scholar
  27. Hayes, S. C. & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–270. Scholar
  28. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hayes, S. C., Niccolls, R., Masuda, A., & Rye, A. K. (2002). Prejudice, terrorism and behavior therapy. Cognitive & Behavioral Practice, 9, 296–301. Scholar
  30. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Roget, N., Padilla, M., Kohlenberg, B., Fisher, G., Masuda, A., Pistorello, J., Rye, A., Berry, K., & Niccolls, R. (2004). The impact of acceptance and commitment training and multicultural training on the stigmatizing attitudes and professional burnout of substance abuse counselors: Research on acceptance and commitment therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 821–835. Scholar
  31. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Irving, L. (2000). Promoting size acceptance in elementary school children: The EDAP puppet program. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 8, 221–232. Scholar
  33. Jaspars, J. M. & Warnaen, S. (1982). Intergroup relations, ethnic identity, and self-evaluation in Indonesia. In H.Tajfel (Ed.) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Paris: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56(3), 505–518. Scholar
  35. Leslie, J. C., Tierney, K. J., Robinson, C. P., Keenan, M., Watt, A., & Barnes, D. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat words. The Psychological Record, 43(1), 153–161.Google Scholar
  36. Lillis, J., & Hayes, S.C. in press, Applying acceptance, mindfulness, and values to the reduction of prejudice: A pilot study. Behavior Modification.Google Scholar
  37. Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R., (2001). The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 2, 61–79.Google Scholar
  38. McGlinchey, A., & Keenan, M. (1997). Stimulus equivalence and social categorization in Northern Ireland. Behavior and Social Issues, 7(2), 113–128.
  39. Mellott, D. S. & Greenwald, A. G. (2000, May). Measuring implicit ageism: Do the Implicit Association Test and semantic priming measure the same construct? Paper presented at meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  40. Mendelson, B. K., Mendelson, M. J., & White, D. R. (2001). Body-Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 90–106. Scholar
  41. Moxon, P. D., Keenan, M., & Hine, L. (1993). Gender-role stereotyping and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 381–394.Google Scholar
  42. Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Faibisch, L. (1998). Perceived stigmatization among overweight African-American and Caucasian adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23, 264–270. Scholar
  43. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115. Scholar
  44. Nosek, B., Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (2005). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. Scholar
  45. O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. Psychological Record, 52, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62, 42–55. Scholar
  47. Pagan, J. A., & Davila, A. (1997). Obesity, occupational attainment, and earnings: Consequences of obesity. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 756–770.Google Scholar
  48. Pierce, J. W., & Wardle, J. (1997). Cause and effect beliefs and self-esteem of overweight children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 645–650. Scholar
  49. Puhl, R., & Brownell, K. (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788–805. Scholar
  50. Register, C. A., & Williams, D. R. (1990). The wage effects of obesity: A longitudinal study. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 130–141.Google Scholar
  51. Rehfeldt, R. A. (2003). Establishing contextual control over generalized equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 53, 415–428.Google Scholar
  52. Rehfeldt, R. A., & Hayes, L. J. (2000). The long-term retention of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson, B., Bacon, J., & O’Reilly, J. (1993). Fat phobia: Measuring, understanding, and changing anti-fat attitudes. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 14, 467–480.<467::AID-EAT2260140410>3.0.CO;2-JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Sidman, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  57. Suls, J. (2001). Report from the editor of PSPB: Turning the corner! Dialogue, 16, 28.Google Scholar
  58. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. Scholar
  59. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177. Scholar
  60. Tajfel, H., Nemeth, C., Jahoda, G., Campbell, J. D., & Johnson, N. (1970). The development of children’s preference for their own country: A cross-national study. International Journal of Psychology, 5, 245–253.Google Scholar
  61. Teachman, B. A, Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy, Health Psychology, 22, 68–78.
  62. Watt, A., Keenan, M., Barnes, D., & Cairns, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weatherly, J., Miller, K., & McDonald, T. W. (1999). Social influence as stimulus control. Behavior and Social Issues, 9, 25–45. Scholar

Copyright information

© Jonathan H. Weinstein, Kelly G. Wilson, Chad E. Drake, & Karen Kate Kellum 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan H. Weinstein
    • 1
  • Kelly G. Wilson
    • 2
  • Chad E. Drake
    • 1
  • Karen Kate Kellum
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of MississippiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology/Peabody BuildingUniversity of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations