Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 20–40 | Cite as

Belief in Free Will: Measurement and Conceptualization Innovations

  • Richard F. RakosEmail author
  • Kimberly R. Laurene
  • Sarah Skala
  • Stephen Slane
Article

Abstract

Though the existence of free will seems to be a background assumption in Western life, very little research has examined the belief, and the handful of studies that have done so suggest only a modest endorsement and unclear relationships to other variables. However, methodological flaws in the earlier studies likely produced an underestimation of the strength of the belief among the general population. The current study developed and then administered a new measure of belief in free will to samples of senior high school and college students under conditions where demand characteristics were controlled. Both age groups endorsed the belief in free will to a much stronger extent than seen in previous research. Further, adults associated belief in free will with three purposes of punishment (rehabilitation, retribution, and deterrence) but adolescents only related the belief to retribution. Adults produced a negative correlation between the belief in free will and locus of control whereas adolescents evidenced no association between the variables. Both age groups demonstrated significant correlations between the belief and self-esteem. Finally, adolescents evidenced no correlation between the belief and religious conviction while adults produced a negative correlation between the two variables. In addition, the new free will instrument demonstrated extraordinary factor consistency between both samples. The results are discussed in the context of competing behavior analytic views regarding the origin of the belief in free will (cultural conditioning versus evolutionary adaptation) and the implications the origin has for progressive social and cultural change.

Keywords

free will determinism human agency moral responsibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bethlehem, D. (1987). Scolding the carpenter. In S. Modgil & C. Mogdil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (p. 89–97). New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Breland, K. & Breland, M. (1964). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16, 681–684.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crick, F. H. C. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. New York: Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Dilman, I. (1999). Free will: An historical and philosophical introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Easterbrook, J. A. (1978). The determinants of free will: A psychological analysis of responsible, adjustive behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fleming, J. S., & Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 921–929.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frager, R. & Fadiman, J. (2005). Personality and personal growth (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Goodenough, O. R. (2004). Responsibility and punishment: Whose mind? A response. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1805–1809.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greene, J. & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1775–1785.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Haynes, S. D., Rojas, D., & Viney, W. (2003). Free will, determinism, and punishment. Psychological Reports, 93, 1013–1021.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3f.1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world, a novel. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  15. Laraway, S., Snycerski, M. J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. London, P. (1964). The modes and morals of psychotherapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Kane, R. H. (Ed.). (2002). The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhlmann, H. (2005). Living Walden Two: B.F. Skinner’s behaviorist utopia and experimental communities. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nettler, G. (1959). Cruelty, dignity, and determinism. American Sociological Review, 24, 375–384.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2089386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Overbye, D. (2007, January 2). Free will: Now you have it, now you don’t. New York Times, p.F1.Google Scholar
  23. Rakos, R. F. (2004). The belief in free will as a biological adaptation: Thinking inside and outside the behavior analytic box. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 5, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rakos, R. F. (2005, May). Is the “sense of autonomy” a primary reinforcer for humans? Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Rakos, R. F. (2006, May). The belief in free will as establishing operation: Universal biological adaptation or Western cultural phenomenon? Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  26. Reynolds, W. M. (1988). Measurement of academic self-concept in college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 223–240.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5202_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1). San Diego, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Roof, W. C., & Perkins, R. P. (1975). On conceptualizing salience in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 111–128.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1384735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).Google Scholar
  32. Russell, B. (1955). Human society in ethics and law. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
  33. Sappington, A. A. (1978). Recent psychological approaches to the free will versus determinism issue. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 19–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.1.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Jaquish, G. A. (1981). The assessment of adolescent self-esteem: A comparison of methods. Journal of Personality, 49, 324–336.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1981.tb00940.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmitt, D. P. & Pilcher, J. J. (2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know when we see one? Psychological Science, 15, 643–649.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00734.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherrington, C. (1940). Man on his nature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden Two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  41. Smilansky, S. (2000). Free will and illusion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Smilansky, S. (2002). Free will, fundamental dualism, and the centrality of illusion. In R. Kane (Ed.), the Oxford handbook of free will (pp. 489–505). New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stroessner, S. J. & Green, C. W. (2001). Effects of belief in free will or determinism on attitudes toward punishment and locus of control. Journal of Social Psychology,130, 789–799.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924631
  44. Valecha, G. K. (1972). Construct validation of internal-external locus of control as measured by an abbreviated 11-item IE scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University, 1972.Google Scholar
  45. Valecha, G. K., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). An abbreviated measure of internal-external locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1974.10119987CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard F. Rakos, Kimberly R. Laurene, Sarah Skala & Stephen Slane 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard F. Rakos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kimberly R. Laurene
    • 2
  • Sarah Skala
    • 3
  • Stephen Slane
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Bowling Green State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Cleveland State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations