Comparative Migration Studies

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 361–383 | Cite as

‘This is My Home’

Pakistani and Polish Migrants’ Return Considerations as Articulations About ‘Home’
  • Marta Bivand ErdalEmail author
Open Access


Considerations about return are a persistent dimension of identity work in migrant populations. The question of where and what constitutes ‘home’ for migrants is central to understanding processes of integration, sustained transnational ties, and return considerations, because reflections about ‘home’ are reflective of belonging. Based on analysis of migrants’ and descendants reflections about the possibility of return migration, this paper asks: how is ‘home’ located in the transnational social field, and in which ways do the mutually overlapping spatial, temporal, emotional and rational dimensions of home matter? The paper draws on semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a total of 75 migrants and descendants from Pakistan and Poland living in Norway. Data from the two migrant groups with distinct migration histories are combined. Perhaps surprisingly, more similarities than differences are found between the two groups, with regard to their reflections about belonging. Considerations about return are found to be revealing of changing perspectives on home. For many there is an inherent ambivalence, reflected in home being located here, or there, or both, or neither. However, both migrants’ and descendants exert agency in their own ways of locating ‘home’ and managing the spatial, temporal, emotional and rational dimensions involved.


home return transnational integration Pakistan Poland 


  1. Al Ali, N. & Koser, K. (eds) (2002) New Approaches to Migration? Transnational Communities and the Transformation of Home, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, L. & Sonn, C. C. (2010) ‘Constructing Identity as a Second-Generation Cypriot Turkish in Australia: The Multi-hyphenated Other’, Culture & Psychology, 16(3): 416–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthias, F. (2002) ‘Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality’, Ethnicities, 2(4): 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldassar, L. (2007) ‘Transnational families and the provision of moral and emotional support: The relationship between truth and distance’, Identities, 14(7): 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blom, S. & Henriksen, K. (2008) ‘Levekår blant innvandrere i Norge 2005/2006’. Oslo-Kongsvinger, Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  6. Blunt, A. & Dowling, R (2006) Home, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bolognani, M. (2007) ‘The myth of return: dismissal, survival or revival? A Bradford example of transnationalism as a poltical instrument’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1): 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolognani, M. (2014) ‘Visits to the country of origin: how second-generation British Pakistanis shape transnational identity and maintain power asymmetries’, Global Networks, 14(1): 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brah, A. (1996) Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities, London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R & Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond ‘identity’’, Theory and Society, 29(1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carling, J. (2008) ‘The human dynamics of migrant transnationalism’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(8): 1452–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carling, J. & Hoelscher, K. (2013) ‘Capacity and Desire to Remit: Comparing Local and Transnational Influences’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6): 939–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carling, J. & Pettersen, S. V. (in press (2014)) ‘Immigrant integration, transnationalism, and return migration intentions’, International Migration.Google Scholar
  14. Charsley, K. (2007) ‘Risk, trust, gender and transnational cousin marriage among British Pakistanis’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6): 1117–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Haas, H. & Fokkema, T. (2011) ‘The effects of integration and transnational ties on international return migration intentions’, Demographic Research, 24: 755–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dwyer, C. (2002) ‘“Where are you from?” Young British Muslims women and the making of “home”’, in Blunt, A. & McEwan, C. (eds) Postcolonial Geographies, pp. 184–199. London, Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Døving, C. A. (2009) ‘Migration — Ritual attrition or increased flexibility? A case study of Pakistani funeral practices in Norway’, in Kalra, V. S. (ed) Pakistani diasporas: Culture, Conflict and Change. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Engbersen, G. & Snel, E. (2013) ‘Liquid migration: Dynamic and fluid patterns of post-accession migration flows’, in Glorius, B., Grabowska-Lusinska, I. & Kuvik, A. (eds) Mobility in Transition: Migration Patterns after EU Enlargement, pp. 21–40. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Erdal, M. B. (2012) ‘‘A Place to Stay in Pakistan’: Why Migrants Build Houses in their Country of Origin’, Population Space and Place, 18(5): 629–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erdal, M. B. (2013) ‘Migrant Transnationalism and Multi-Layered Integration: Norwegian-Pakistani Migrants’ Own Reflections’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6): 983–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erdal, M. B. & Oeppen, C. (2013) ‘Migrant Balancing acts: Ways of Understanding the Interactions Between Integration and Transnationalism’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6): 867–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friberg, J. H. (2012) ‘The stages of migration. From going abroad to settling down: Post-accession Polish migrant workers in Norway’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(10): 1589–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frye, M. (2012) ‘Bright Futures in Malawi’s New Dawn: Educational Aspirations as Assertions of Identity’, American Journal of Sociology, 117(6): 1565–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galasiñska, A. (2010) ‘Leavers and stayers discuss returning home: Internet discourses on migration in the context of the post-communist transformation’, Social Identities, 16(3): 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho, E. E. L. (2009) ‘Constituting citizenship through the emotions: Singaporean transmigrants in London’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4): 788–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kivisto, P. & La Vecchia-Mikkola, V. (2013) ‘Immigrant Ambivalence toward the Homeland: The Case of Iraqis in Helsinki and Rome’, Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 11(2): 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levitt, P. & Waters, M. C. (eds) (2002) The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Malkki, L. (1992) ‘National geographic: the rooting of peoples and the territorialisation of national identity among scholars and refugees’, Cultural anthropology, 7(1): 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mallett, S. (2004) ‘Understanding home: A critical review of the literature’, The Sociological Review, 52(1): 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Massey, D. (1997) ‘A global sense of place’, in Barnes, T. & Gregory, D. (eds) Reading Human Geography, pp. 315–323. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
  31. Mazzucato, V., Kabki, M. & Smith, L. (2006) ‘Transnational Migration and the Economy og Funerals: Changing Practices in Ghana’, Development and Change, 37(5): 1047–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oeppen, C. (2013) ‘A stranger at ‘home’: interactions between transnational return visits and integration for Afghan refugees.’, Global Networks, 13(2): 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Okólski, M. (2012) ‘Spatial Mobility from the Perspective of the Incomplete Migration Concept’, Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 1(1): 11–35.Google Scholar
  34. Rapport, N. a. D., A. (ed) (1998) Migrants of identity: perceptions of “home” in a world of movement, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  35. Ryan, L. (2008) ‘Navigating the Emotional Terrain of Families “Here” and “There”: Women, Migration and the Management of Emotions’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3): 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rytter, M. (2010) ‘A Sunbeam of Hope: Negotiations of Identity and Belonging among Pakistanis in Denmark’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(4): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schans, D. (2009) ‘Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7): 1164–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skrbiš, Z. (2008) ‘Transnational families: Theorising migration, emotions and belonging’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3): 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snel, E., Engbersen, G. & Leerkes, A. (2006) ‘Transnational involvement and social integration’, Global Networks, 6(3): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Song, C. (2009) ‘Brothers Only in Name. The Alienation and Identity Transformation of Korean Chinese Return Migrants in South Korea’, in Tsuda, T. (ed) Diasporic Homecomings. Ethnic Return Migration in Comparative Perspective, pp. 281–304. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Steyn, M. E. & Grant, T. (2007) ‘“A real bag of mixed emotions”: Re-entry experiences of South African exiles’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(3): 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tolia-Kelly, D. (2004) ‘Locating processes of identification: studying the precipitates of re-memory through artefacts in the British Asian home’, Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers, 29(3): 314–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsuda, T. (2004) ‘When Home Is Not the Homeland: The Case of Japanese Brazilian Ethnic Return Migration’, in Stefansson, A. H. & Markowitz, F. (eds) Homecomings. Unsettling Paths of Return, pp. 125–145. Lanham, MD, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  44. Van Leeuwen, B. (2008) ‘On the affective ambivalence of living with cultural diversity’, Ethnicities, 8(2): 147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vertovec, S. & Cohen, R. (eds) (2002) Conceiving cosmopolitanism: theory context and practice New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Werbner, P. (1999) ‘Global Pathways: Working class cosmopolitans and the creation of transnational ethnic worlds’, Social Anthropology 7(1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White, A. (2013) ‘Double return migration: failed returns to Poland leading to settlement abroad and new transnational strategies’, International Migration.Google Scholar
  48. Wimmer, A. & Schiller, N. G. (2002) ‘Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences’, Global Networks 2(4): 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations