Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Tibial Attachment Preserving Hamstring Graft without Implant on Tibial Side

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tibial attachment preserving hamstring graft could prevent potential problems of free graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction such as pull out before graft-tunnel healing or rupture before ligamentization. Different implants have been reportedly used for tibial side fixation with this technique. We investigated short-term outcome of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial attachment sparing hamstring graft without implant on the tibial side by outside in technique.

Materials and Methods

Seventy nine consecutive cases of ACL tear having age of 25.7 ± 6.8 years were included after Institutional Board Approval. All subjects were male. The mean time interval from injury to surgery was of 7.5 ± 6.4 months. Hamstring tendons were harvested with open tendon stripper leaving the tibial insertion intact. The free ends of the tendons were whip stitched, quadrupled, and whip stitched again over the insertion site of hamstring with fiber wire (Arthrex). Single bundle ACLR was done by outside in technique and the femoral tunnel was created with cannulated reamer. The graft was pulled up to the external aperture of femoral tunnel and fixed with interference screw (Arthrex). The scoring was done by Lysholm, Tegner, and KT 1000 by independent observers. All cases were followed up for 2 years.

Results

The mean length of quadrupled graft attached to tibia was 127.65 ± 7.5 mm, and the mean width was 7.52 ± 0.78 mm. The mean preoperative Lysholm score of 47.15 ± 9.6, improved to 96.8 ± 2.4 at 1 year. All cases except two returned to the previous level of activity after ACLR. There was no significant difference statistically between preinjury (5.89 ± 0.68) and postoperative (5.87 ± 0.67) Tegner score. The anterior tibial translation (ATT) (KT 1000) improved from 11.44 ± 1.93 mm to 3.59 ± 0.89 mm. The ATT of operated knee returned to nearly the similar value as of the opposite knee (3.47 ± 1.16 mm). The Pivot shift test was negative in all cases. None had a failure of graft till final followup.

Conclusion

Attachment sparing hamstring graft without a tibial implant is a simple, cost-effective technique that provides a consistently satisfactory outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sinha S, Naik AK, Meena D, Jain VK, Arya RK. Creation of femoral tunnel by outside-in technique for ACL reconstruction: An analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134:1709–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deehan DJ, Cawston TE. The biology of integration of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:889–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Papachristou G, Nikolaou V, Efstathopoulos N, Sourlas J, Lazarettos J, Frangia K, et al. ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon autograft without detachment of its tibial insertion: A histologic study in a rabbit model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:1175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Janssen RP, Scheffler SU. Intraarticular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014;22:2102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blickenstaff KR, Grana WA, Egle D. Analysis of a semitendinosus autograft in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:554–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Löcherbach C, Zayni R, Chambat P, Sonnery-Cottet B. Biologically enhanced ACL reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;96:810–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagih AM. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using in situ hamstring graft with 4 tunnels. Arthrosc Tech 2014;3:e49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buda R, Ruffilli A, Vannini F, Parma A, Giannini S. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using distally inserted doubled hamstrings tendons. Orthopedics 2013;36:449–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruffilli A, Pagliazzi G, Ferranti E, Busacca M, Capannelli D, Buda R, et al. Hamstring graft tibial insertion preservation versus detachment in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2016;26:657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali MS, Kumar A, Adnaan Ali S, Hislop T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft without detachment of the tibial insertion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:644–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SJ, Kim HK, Lee YT. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon graft without detachment of the tibial insertion. Arthroscopy 1997;13:656–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sacramento SN, Magalhães E, Christel P, Ingham S, Fukuda TY. A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with implant-free tibial fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:2831–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lane JG, McFadden P, Bowden K, Amiel D. The ligamentization process: A 4 year case study following ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosis graft. Arthroscopy 1993;9:149–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goradia VK, Rochat MC, Kida M, Grana WA. Natural history of a hamstring tendon autograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a sheep model. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:40–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Doschak MR, Zernicke RF. Structure, function and adaptation of bone-tendon and bone-ligament complexes. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2005;5:35–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tetsumura S, Fujita A, Nakajima M, Abe M. Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. J Orthop Sci 2006;11:278–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magen HE, Howell SM, Hull ML. Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:35–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaffagnini S, Golanò P, Farinas O, Depasquale V, Strocchi R, Cortecchia S, et al. Vascularity and neuroreceptors of the pes anserinus: Anatomic study. Clin Anat 2003;16:19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Buda R, Di Caprio F, Giuriati L, Luciani D, Busacca M, Giannini S, et al. Partial ACL tears augmented with distally inserted hamstring tendons and over-the-top fixation: An MRI evaluation. Knee 2008;15:111–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Natali S, Buda R, Giuriati L, Pagliazzi G, Baldassarri M, Calderoni EF, et al. Anatomic ACL reconstruction using distally inserted double hamstring tendons: Surgical techniques and result. J Orthop 2013;5:147–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Collette M, Cassard X. The tape locking screw technique (TLS): A new ACL reconstruction method using a short hamstring graft. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011;97:555–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Skand Sinha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinha, S., Naik, A.K., Maheshwari, M. et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Tibial Attachment Preserving Hamstring Graft without Implant on Tibial Side. IJOO 52, 170–176 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_85_17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_85_17

Keywords

MeSH terms

Navigation