Skip to main content

Growing Without Pain: The Noninvasive Expandable Prosthesis is Boon for Children with Bone Cancer, as well as Their Surgeons!

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics volume 53, pages 174–182 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Orthopedic oncology has evolved over the past few decades to favor limb salvage over amputations. The noninvasive expandable prosthesis can be lengthened with an externally applied magnetic field eliminating the pain, stiffness, as well as the risk of infection. We present the largest series in Indian experience with this implant over the last 8 years while analyzing its benefit to the surgeons and the patients, but are we able to justify the cost effectiveness?

Materials and Methods

Eighteen implants were used in 16 patients with nonmetastatic primary bone sarcoma from May 2006 to June 2015. All implants were manufactured by Stanmore implants worldwide based in London, UK. Lengthening was done in the outpatient department during the followup visits using an external electromagnetic coil. The function was assessed using the musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score.

Results

The patients had a mean age of 10.25 years at the time of surgery. The mean followup was 49.56 months. Twelve patients are alive at a followup after surgery. The prostheses were lengthened by a mean of 31.64 mm and average lengthening per session was 4.18 mm. The mean MSTS score was 28.83. Two revisions for jammed mechanism and two patients had a successful two-stage revision for delayed infection.

Conclusion

The noninvasive expandable prosthesis is an ideal implant for children undergoing limb salvage surgery for bone sarcoma who are expected to have more than 3 cm of limb length discrepancy at maturity. The initial high cost compared to a minimally invasive expandable implant can be recovered as there is no additional cost of lengthening. The small amounts of lengthening at more frequent intervals is more physiological as compared with the minimally invasive type where more lengthening is done to minimize the number of procedures. While the functional and oncological outcomes are comparable, this implant allows limb lengths to be maintained without pain, functional compromise or risk of infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Lewis MM. The use of an expandable and adjustable prosthesis in the treatment of childhood malignant bone tumors of the extremity. Cancer 1986;57:499–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Link MP, Goorin AM, Miser AW, Green AA, Pratt CB, Belasco JB, et al. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1600–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis MM, Bloom N, Esquieres EM, Kenan S, Ryniker DM. The expandable prosthesis. An alternative to amputation for children with malignant bone tumors. AORN J 1987;46:457–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rougraff BT, Simon MA, Kneisl JS, Greenberg DB, Mankin HJ. Limb salvage compared with amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. A long-term oncological, functional, and quality-of-life study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:649–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schindler OS, Cannon SR, Briggs TW, Blunn GW, Grimer RJ, Walker PS. Use of extendable total femoral replacements in children with malignant bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;357:157–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krieg AH, Lenze U, Speth BM, Hasler CC. Intramedullary leg lengthening with a motorized nail. Acta Orthop 2011;82:344–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckardt JJ, Kabo JM, Kelley CM, Ward WG Sr, Asavamongkolkul A, Wirganowicz PZ, et al. Expandable endoprosthesis reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;373:51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eckardt JJ, Safran MR, Eilber FR, Rosen G, Kabo JM. Expandable endoprosthetic reconstruction of the skeletally immature after malignant bone tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;297:188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta A, Meswania J, Pollock R, Cannon SR, Briggs TW, Taylor S, et al. Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:649–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pramesh CS, Deshpande MS, Pardiwala DN, Agarwal MG, Puri A. Core needle biopsy for bone tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:668–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;204:9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:241–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Implants Information. Available from: http://www.stanmoreimplants.com. [Last accessed on 2016 Jan].

  14. Simon MA, Aschliman MA, Thomas N, Mankin HJ. Limb-salvage treatment versus amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur 1986. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilkins RM, Soubeiran A. The Phenix expandable prosthesis: Early American experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;382:51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gitelis S, Neel MD, Wilkins RM, Rao BN, Kelly CM, Yao TK. The use of a closed expandable prosthesis for pediatric sarcomas. Chir Organi Mov 2003;88:327–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Neel MD, Wilkins RM, Rao BN, Kelly CM. Early multicenter experience with a noninvasive expandable prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;415:72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumgart R, Betz A, Schweiberer L. A fully implantable motorized intramedullary nail for limb lengthening and bone transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;415:135–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geesink RG, de Groot K, Klein CP. Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:17–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. FP Implant. FDA approves minimally invasive extendible implant system from UK developer. J Clin Eng 2011;36:150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Manit K Gundavda & Manish G. Agarwal

Authors
  1. Manit K Gundavda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manish G. Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manit K Gundavda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gundavda, M.K., Agarwal, M.G. Growing Without Pain: The Noninvasive Expandable Prosthesis is Boon for Children with Bone Cancer, as well as Their Surgeons!. JOIO 53, 174–182 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_53_17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_53_17

Keywords

  • Bone tumors
  • expandable prosthesis
  • limb length discrepancy
  • limb salvage
  • noninvasive lengthening