Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patellar Resurfacing versus Nonresurfacing with Patellaplasty in Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains one of the important reasons for patient dissatisfaction. The management of patellofemoral joint is controversial and a decision whether to resurface the patella or not, is important. The present study compares the clinical and radiological outcomes between patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in patients undergoing bilateral TKA

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective comparative study with 60 patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous TKA (120 knees) with posterior stabilized Hi flex fixed bearing knee (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), by two surgeons. The patients were allocated to the two groups of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing of patella. In nonresurfacing group, patellaplasty was done. Patients with clinicoradiological signs of tricompartmental arthritis were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included unilateral TKA, rheumatoid arthritis, postseptic arthritis, previous high tibial osteotomy, or unicondylar knee arthroplasty cases. Patients were assessed using Knee Society Score (KSS), Modified Samsung Medical Centre Score (MSMCS), Feller patellar score. Radiological evaluation was performed at 1 year using congruence angle and patellar tilt angle

Results

Mean followup was 19 months (range 12–25 months). Mean KSS, MSMCS, Feller patellar scores in resurfacing group were 82.67, 10.68, and 25.97, respectively and in nonresurfacing group were 82.93, 10.48, and 24.90, respectively. Mean congruence angle in resurfacing group was −12.83° and in nonresurfacing group was −12.383° (P = 0.917) and mean patellar tilt angle in resurfacing is 8.07 and nonresurfacing group is 7.97 (P = 0.873)

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference in short-term clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in the two groups and therefore, routine patellar resurfacing for patient undergoing TKA is not advantageous

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:1163–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badhe N, Dewnany G, Livesley PJ. Should the patella be replaced in total knee replacement? Int Orthop 2001;25:97–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrack RL, Wolfe MW. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel K, Raut V. Patella in total knee arthroplasty: To resurface or not to – A cohort study of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011;35:349–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomes LS, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB. Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty. A roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988 Nov;(236):72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg AG. Management of the failed metal-backed patella. Orthopedics 1996;19:813–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rand JA. Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 2004;86-A: 2062–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calvisi V, Camillieri G, Lupparelli S. Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: A critical appraisal of the available evidence. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:1261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, et al. A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;432:196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim BS, Reitman RD, Schai PA, Scott RD. Selective patellar nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. 10 year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;367:81–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pakos EE, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1438–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, Fiddian N, Fitzpatrick R, Grant A, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: Five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1473–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu Y, Wang G, Fu Q. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. He JY, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Is patellar resurfacing superior than nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Knee 2011;18:137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1301–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen K, Li G, Fu D, Yuan C, Zhang Q, Cai Z, et al. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop 2013;37:1075–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CH, Ha CW, Kim S, Kim M, Song YJ. A novel patellofemoral scoring system for patellofemoral joint status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:620–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:226–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agarwala S, Sobti A, Naik S. Patellaplasty, as an alternative to replacing patella in total knee arthroplasty. Open J Orthop 2015;5:277–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:754–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranawat CS, Insall J, Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: Hospital for special surgery design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;120:76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: A modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1317–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;392:46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Forster MC. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Knee 2004;11:427–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li S, Chen Y, Su W, Zhao J, He S, Luo X, et al. Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011;35:305–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Burnett RS, Boone JL, McCarthy KP, Rosenzweig S, Barrack RL. A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;464:65–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Campbell DG, Duncan WW, Ashworth M, Mintz A, Stirling J, Wakefield L, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: A ten-year randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:734–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS. Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76:930–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Waters TS, Bentley G. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:212–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanos SP, et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: A prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Elson DW, Brenkel IJ. Predicting pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:1047–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr. Balderston RA. The patellar clunk syndrome. A complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 Apr; 241:203–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yau WP, Wong JW, Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM. Patellar clunk syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:1023–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fukunaga K, Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, Iwaki H, Hashimoto Y, Takaoka K, et al. The incidence of the patellar clunk syndrome in a recently designed mobile-bearing posteriorly stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ip D, Wu WC, Tsang WL. Comparison of two total knee prostheses on the incidence of patella clunk syndrome. Int Orthop 2002;26:48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Agarwala SR, Mohrir GS, Patel AG. Patellar clunk syndrome in a current high flexion total knee design. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1846–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ertürk C, Altay MA, Işikan UE. Patelloplasty with patellar decompression to relieve anterior knee pain in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011;45:425–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hwang BH, Yang IH, Han CD. Comparison of patellar retention versus resurfacing in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:524–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: A report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:262–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shoji H, Yoshino S, Kajino A. Patellar replacement in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. A study of patients who had rheumatoid arthritis and no gross deformity of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:853–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schroeder-Boersch H, Scheller G, Fischer J, Jani L. Advantages of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Two-year results of a prospective randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J, Hardie R, Robertson D, et al. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;321:156–61.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of followup. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A: 1376–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Berry DJ, Rand JA. Isolated patellar component revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;286:110–5.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seo SS, Kim CW, Moon SW. A comparison of patella retention versus resurfacing for moderate or severe patellar articular defects in total knee arthroplasty: Minimum 5-year followup results. Knee Surg Relat Res 2011;23:142–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hägglund E, Dunningham TH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:675–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Khatod M, Codsi M, Bierbaum B. Results of resurfacing a native patella in patients with a painful total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2004;17:151–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, Dansgård F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:377–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Grewal R, Rimmer MG, Freeman MA. Early migration of prostheses related to long term survivorship. Comparison of tibial components in knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:239–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Shetty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwala, S., Shetty, V., Karumuri, L.K. et al. Patellar Resurfacing versus Nonresurfacing with Patellaplasty in Total Knee Arthroplasty. IJOO 52, 393–398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_512_16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_512_16

Keywords

MeSH terms

Navigation