Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Controversies in the management of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus in adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The surgical approach, type of olecranon osteotomy, method of stabilization of osteotomy, type of fracture stabilization, orthogonal vs parallel plate fixation, need for transposition of ulnar nerve, place for primary total elbow replacement, and type of rehabilitation schedule after surgical fracture treatment are the controversial issues in the treatment of complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures (C2 and C3) in adults. Severe comminution, bone loss, and osteoporosis at the site of distal articular fractures of humerus often lead to unsatisfactory results due to inadequate fixation. We hereby report the outcome of a series of intracondylar fractures of the humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation and discuss the controversies in light of published literature.

Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty-four patients of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus (C2 and C3) were operated by posterior transolecranon approach between January 1980 and December 2008. Initially, in the first part Chevron intra-articular osteotomy (n=108) was performed out of which 94 have been published in another publication. In later second part (1993 onward), extra-articular olecranon osteotomy (n=76) was routinely performed. Both columns were stably fixed by orthogonal methods; (n=174) however, during the last 2 years, in 10 patients with severe comminution with bone loss, stabilization was achieved by parallel plating. The osteotomy was routinely stabilized by tension band wiring with two parallel K-wires introduced up to the anterior ulnar cortex. The results were evaluated by the staging system of Caja et al. at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Results: In the first part of the study (n=94), there was delayed union in 4% (n=4), with the fracture taking more than 20 weeks for union. There was delayed union of ulnar osteotomy (n=3) and failure of one tension band wiring, requiring revision. Some loss of motion was seen in 20% of cases and these patients did not achieve full flexion and extension. However, all these patients had useful range of function, with 20°–110° of flexion and full pronation-supination. As per the staging system of Caja et al., the results were in the range of excellent to good in 72% cases (n=67), fair in 19% (n=18), and poor in 9% patients (n=9). In the second part of study (n=90) dual plate fixation of both columns by orthogonal methods (n=80) and parallel plate fixation in 10 patients was performed. The results were excellent to good in 78 patients (86%).

Conclusions: The high rate of union can be achieved in complex intra-articular fractures of distal humerus if the proper principles of stable fracture fixation are followed, i.e., a posterior transolecranon approach and dual fixation of both columns and restoration of the continuity of articular surface. The stability achieved by this technique permits institution of early intensive physiotherapy to restore elbow function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galano GJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Current treatment strategies for bicolumnar distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Srg 2010;18:20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O’Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: Internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique. J Bone Joint Sur Am 2007;89:961–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gambirasio R, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P. Total elbow replacement for complex fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Sur Br 2001;83:974–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frankle MA, Herscovici D Jr, Dipasquale TG, Vasey MB, Sanders RW. A comparison of open reduction and internal fiation and Primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intrarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:47–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Babhulkar S, Pande KC, Babhulkar AS, Babhulkar SS. Primary reconstruction of comminuted intra-articular distal humerus fractures. International J Ortho Trauma 1995;5:170–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caja VL, Moroni A, Vendemia V, Sabato C, Zinghi G. Surgical treatment of bicondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Injury 1994;25:433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: Epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:38–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKee MD, Wilson TL, Winston L, Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures through a posterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1701–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cobb TK, Morrey BF. Total elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79-A: 826–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anglen J. Distal humerus fractures surgical techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holdsworth BJ, Mossad MM. Fractures of the adult distal humerus. Elbow function after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:362–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ring D, Gulotta L, Chin K, Jupiter JB. Olecranon osteotomy for exposure of fractures and nonunions of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:446–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zlotolow DN, Catalano LW, Barron OA, Glickel SZ. Surgical Exposure of the Humerus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14:754–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung EV, Steinmann, SP. Surgical approaches to the elbow -Review article. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17:325–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Driscoll SW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME. Management of the smashed distal humerus. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33:19–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O’Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: Internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:31–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bryan RS, Morrey BF. Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow: A triceps-sparing approach. Clin Orthop 1982; 166:188–92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Driscoll SW. The triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle (TRAP) approach for distal humeral fractures and nonunions. Orthop Clin North Am 2000;31:91–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cassebaum WH. Open reduction of T and Y fractures of lower end of the humerus. J Trauma 1969:9:915–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 1981;63,872–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. Techniques recommended by AO Group. 2nd ed. New York: Springer;1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkinson JM, Stanley D. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: A comparative anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:380–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgower M. Intercondylar fractures of the humerus. An operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:226–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coles CP, Barei DP, Sean E, Nork SE, Taitsman LA, Hanel DP. The Olecranon Osteotomy: A Six-year Experience in the Treatment of Intraarticular Fractures of the Distal Humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:164–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gainor BJ, Moussa F, Schott T. Healing rate of transverse osteotomies of the olecranon used in reconstruction of distal humerus fractures. J South Orthop Assoc 1995;4:263–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chin K, Ring D, Jupiter JB. Double tension-band fixation of the olecranon. Tech Should Elbow Surg 2000;1:61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Campbell WC. Campbell’s Operative Orthopedics. St. Louis, MO: Mosby;1971. p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McKee MD, Kim J, Kebaish K, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH. Functional outcome after open supracondylar fractures of the humerus. The effect of the surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:646–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Athwal GS, Rispoli DM, Steinmann SP. The anconeus flap transolecranon approach to the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:282–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alonso-Llames M. Bilaterotricipital approach to the elbow: Its application in the osteosynthesis of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Acta Orthop Scand 1972;43:479–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Salduz A, Kilicoglu O, Seyahi A. Functional results of the parallel plating for complex distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009;43:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ackerman G, Jupiter JB. Non-union of fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:75–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Korner J, Diederichs G, Arzdorf M, Lill H, Josten C, Schneider E. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:286–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schemitsch EH, Tencer AF, Henley MB. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8:468–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Self J, Viegas SF, Buford WL Jr, Patterson RM. A comparison of double-plate fixation methods for complex distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995;4:10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobson SR, Glisson RR, Urbaniak JR. Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: A biomechanical study. J South Orthop Assoc 1997;6:241–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Helfet D, Hotchkiss R. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: A biomechanical comparison of methods. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:260–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Arnander MW Reeves A, MacLeod IA, Pinto TM, Khaleel A. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:332–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jupiter JB. The management of nonunion and maluinon of the distal humerus- A 30 year experience. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:742–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Guitton TG, Jupiter JB. 90-90 versus parallel plating of distal Humerus fractures;AO Dialogue 2/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen RC, Harris DJ, Leduc S, Borrelli JJ, Tornetta P, Ricci WM. 2009. Is ulnar nerve transposition beneficial during open reduction internal fixation of distal humerus fracture? J Orthop Trauma 2010; 7:391–4.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vazquez O, Rutgers M, Ring DC, Walsh M, Egol KA. Fate of the ulnar nerve after operative fixation of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 7:395–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Figgie MP, Inglis AE, Mow CS, Figgie HE III. Salvage of non¬union of supracondylar fracture of the humerus by total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1058–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cobb TK, Morrey BF. Total elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79-A:826–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur, India

    Sudhir Babhulkar

  2. Sushrut Hospital, Reseach Center and Postgraduate Institute of Orthopedics, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur, 440 010, India

    Sushrut Babhulkar

Authors
  1. Sudhir Babhulkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sushrut Babhulkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhir Babhulkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babhulkar, S., Babhulkar, S. Controversies in the management of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus in adults. IJOO 45, 216–225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.80039

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.80039

Key words

Search

Navigation