Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Iso-C3D navigation assisted pedicle screw placement in deformities of the cervical and thoracic spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Pedicle screw instrumentation of the deformed cervical and thoracic spine is challenging to even the most experienced surgeon and associated with increased incidence of screw misplacement. Iso-C3D based navigation has been reported to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, however, there are very few studies assessing its efficacy in the presence of deformity. We conducted a study to evaluate the accuracy of Iso-C3D based navigation in pedicle screw fixation in the deformed cervical and thoracic spine.

Materials and Methods: We inserted 98 cervical pedicle screws (18 patients) and 242 thoracic pedicle screws (17 patients) using Iso-C3D based navigation for deformities of spine due to scoliosis, ankylosing spondylitis, post traumatic and degenerative disorders. Two independent observers determined and graded the accuracy of screw placement from postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans.

Results: Postoperative CT scans of the cervical spine showed 90.8% perfectly placed screws with 7 (7%) grade I pedicle breaches, 2 (2%) grade II pedicle breaches and one anterior cortex penetration (< 2mm). Five lateral pedicle breaches violated the vertebral artery foramen and three medial pedicle breaches penetrated the spinal canal; however, no patient had any neurovascular complications. In the thoracic spine there were 92.2% perfectly placed screws with only six (2%) grade II pedicle breaches, eight (3%) grade I pedicle breaches and five screws (2%) penetrating the anterior or lateral cortex. No neuro-vascular complications were encountered.

Conclusion: Iso-C3D based navigation improves the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in deformities of the cervical and thoracic spine. The low incidence of pedicle breach implies increased safety for the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boos N, Webb JK. Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: A European view. Eur Spine J 1997;6:2–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaines RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1458–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2239–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB. Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks: Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997;22:1369–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;203:7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, Cho KH, Oh JH. Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 1994;18:341–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW Jr. In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine 2001;26:2340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R. Cervical pedicle screws: Conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liljenqvist UR, Link TM, Halm HF. Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1247–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 2000;25:606–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: A meta-analysis. Spine 2007;32:E111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Minami A. Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg 2003;99:257–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Takahata M, Sudo H, Ohshima S, et al.. Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: Comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1543–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: A randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000;9:235–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavallee S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;354:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Shetty AP. Iso-C3D fluoroscopy-based navigation in direct pedicle screw fixation of Hangman fracture: A case report. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:616–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:E56–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation: A selected survey of ABS members. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2231–8; discussion 2238-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws: Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:977–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, McAfee PC. Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems: An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2529–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:1519–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebraheim N, Rollins JR Jr, Xu R, Jackson WT. Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:691–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Knight T, Yeasting RA. Morphometric evaluation of lower cervical pedicle and its projection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller RM, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Yeasting RA. Anatomic consideration of transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine: An analysis of two approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2317–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanescu S, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, Bailey AS, Jackson WT. Morphometric evaluation of the cervico-thoracic junction: Practical considerations for posterior fixation of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2082–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Geideman WM, Hasan SA, Blanke K. Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:1566–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA. Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:233–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, et al.. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1200–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, et al.. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: Part I: Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1193–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, et al.. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:160–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Robinson M, Polly DW Jr. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws in patients with and without coronal plane spinal deformities. Spine 2002;27:1558–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1399–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Ou Y, Yeasting RA. Anatomic considerations of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:1065–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 2000;25:962–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG. Cervical pedicle screws: Comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2675–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, Vaccaro AR, Foley KF, Albert TJ. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: Comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1655–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rampersaud YR, Lee KS. Fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw placement through a mature fusion mass: An assessment of 24 consecutive cases with independent analysis of computed tomography and clinical data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:217–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Richter M, Amiot LP, Neller S, Kluger P, Puhl W. Computerassisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine: An in-vitro feasibility study. Eur Spine J 2000;9:S65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, 641 011, Tamil Nadu, India

    Vinod V. Rajan, Vijay Kamath, Ajoy Prasad Shetty &  S. Rajasekaran

Authors
  1. Vinod V. Rajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vijay Kamath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Rajasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Rajasekaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajan, V.V., Kamath, V., Shetty, A.P. et al. Iso-C3D navigation assisted pedicle screw placement in deformities of the cervical and thoracic spine. IJOO 44, 163–168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.62083

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.62083

Key words

Search

Navigation