Abstract
Background:
Trochanteric osteotomy still has an important role in hip arthroplasty in cases of (1) preexisting developmental hip dysplasia with superior subluxation, (2) revision arthroplasty, specifically with acetabular component revision in the face of well-fixed femoral component, and (3) recurrent dislocation without component loosening or malalignment, in treatment of complicated trochanteric fixation in osteoporotic bone and nonunions may be difficult. This study reports the clinical outcomes of trochanteric fixation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) utilizing a hook plate construct in a cohort of ten patients.
Materials and Methods:
The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) articulated hook plate was used in nine cases of established approach related nonunion following THA and in one case of osteopenic bone during primary THA. All ten patients returned for interviews and clinical examination. The average time for clinical followup was 35 months (range 5–48 months). The mean age of the study cohort was 65 years (range 56–74 years). Time to union and incidence of postoperative complications were assessed.
Results:
Union occurred in all ten cases at an average of 3.3 months postoperatively. One patient developed symptomatic trochanteric bursitis and required plate removal. Another patient developed a superficial infection which was successfully treated with local wound debridement and antibiotics. A third patient developed a symptomatic neuroma at the site of the iliac crest bone harvest and was successfully treated with excision of the neuroma. No catastrophic implant failures occurred.
Conclusions:
The articulated design of the plate allows for ease in application and functional construct stability. The articulated hook plate is an option for fixation of osteopenic bone fragments and established nonunions of the greater trochanter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Horwitz BR, Rockowitz NL, Goll SR, Booth RE Jr., Balderston RA, Rothman RH, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;291:154–63.
Robinson RP, Robinson HJ Jr., Salvati EA. Comparison of the transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;174:143–7.
Wiesman HJ Jr., Simon SR, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Sledge CB. Total hip replacement with and without osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clinical and biomechanical comparisons in the same patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:203–10.
Parker HG, Wiesman HG, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Sledge CB. Comparison of preoperative, intraoperative and early postoperative total hip replacement with and without trochanteric osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;121:44–9.
Harris WH. A new approach to total hip replacement without osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;106:19–26.
Amstutz HC, Maki S. Complications of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:214–6.
Nutton RW, Checketts RG. The effects of trochanteric osteotomy on abductor power. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984;66:180–3.
Ekelund A. Trochanteric osteotomy for recurrent dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993;8:629–32.
Weber BG, Stühmer G. Improvements in total hip prosthesis implantation technique. A cement-proof seal for the lower medullary cavity and a dihedral self-stabilizing trochanteric osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979;93:185–9.
Wroblewski BM, Shelley P. Reattachment of the greater trochanter after hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67:736–40.
Berry DJ, Müller ME. Chevron osteotomy and single wire reattachment of the greater trochanter in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;294:155–61.
Scher MA, Jakim I. Trochanter re-attachment in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:435–8.
Müller ME. Total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970;72:46–68.
McFarland B, Osborne G. Approach to the hip: A suggested improvement on Kocher’s method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1954;36-B: 364–7.
Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979;95:47–9.
Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982;64:17–9.
Charnley J. The long term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972;54:61–76.
Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1979. p. 37–42.
Dall D. Exposure of the hip by anterior osteotomy of the greater trochanter. A modified anterolateral approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:382–6.
McLauchlan J. The stracathro approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984;66:30–1.
Frankel A, Booth RE Jr., Balderston RA, Cohn J, Rothman RH. Complications of trochanteric osteotomy. Long term implications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;288:209–13.
Dall DM, Miles AW. Re-attachment of the greater trochanter. The use of the trochanter cable-grip system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:55–9.
Silverton CD, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Kull L, Conley A, Galante JO. Complications of a cable grip system. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:400–4.
Kelley SS, Johnston RC. Debris from cobalt-chrome cable may cause acetabular loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;285:140–6.
Volz RG, Brown FW. The painful migrated ununited greater trochanter in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:1091–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandez, D.L., Capo, J.T., Gonzalez-Hernandez, E. et al. Nonunion of greater trochanter following total hip arthroplasty: Treated by an articulated hook plate and bone grafting. IJOO 51, 273–279 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205680
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205680