Skip to main content

Evaluation of Ponseti method in neglected clubfoot

Abstract

Background: Gentle passive manipulation and casting by the Ponseti method have become the preferred method of treatment of clubfoot presenting at an early age. However, very few studies are available in literature on the use of Ponseti method in older children. We conducted this study to find the efficacy of Ponseti method in treating neglected clubfoot, which is a major disabler of children in developing countries.

Materials and Methods: 41 clubfeet in 30 patients, presenting after the walking age were evaluated to determine whether the Ponseti method is effective in treating neglected clubfoot. This is a prospective study. Pirani and Dimeglio scoring were done for all the feet before each casting to monitor the correction of deformity. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared between preoperative and postoperative followup using the paired t-test. Also, the relation between the Pirani and Dimeglio score, and age at presentation with the number of casts required was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. No improvement in Dimeglio or Ponseti score after 3 successive cast was regarded as failure of conservative management in our study.

Results: The mean age at presentation was 3.02 years (range 1.1–10.3 years). The mean followup was 2.6 years (range 2–3.9 years). The mean number of casts applied to achieve final correction were 12.8 casts (range 8–18 casts). The mean time of immobilization in cast was 3.6 months. The mean Dimeglio score before treatment was 15.9 and after treatment were 2.07. The mean Pirani score was 5.41 before treatment and 0.12 after treatment. All feet (100%) achieved painless plantigrade feet without any extensive soft tissue surgery. 7 feet (17%) recurred in our average followup of 2.6 years.

Conclusions: Painless, supple, plantigrade, and cosmetically acceptable feet were achieved in neglected clubfeet without any extensive surgery. A fair trial of conservative Ponseti method should be tried before resorting to extensive soft tissue procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Nogueira MP, Pereira JC, Duarte PS, Lourenco A, Tedesco AP, Ferreira LA, et al. Ponseti Brasil: A national program to eradicate neglected clubfoot - Preliminary results. Iowa Orthop J 2011;31:43–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponseti IV, editor. Treatment. In: Congenital Clubfoot: Fundamentals of Treatment. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 61–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Penny JN. The neglected clubfoot. Tech Orthop 2005 20:153–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term followup of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:986–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Longterm comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1286–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:378–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Verma A, Mehtani A, Sural S, Maini L, Gautam VK, Basran SS, et al. Management of idiopathic clubfoot in toddlers by Ponseti’s method. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012;21:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan SA, Kumar A. Ponseti’s manipulation in neglected clubfoot in children more than 7 years of age: A prospective evaluation of 25 feet with longterm followup. J Pediatr Orthop B 2010;19:385–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, Rajbhandary T, Bijukachhe B, Banskota AK. Ponseti method for untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients from 1 to 6 years of age. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diméglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 1995;4:129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pirani S, Outerbridge HK, Sawatzky B, Stothers K. A Reliable Method of Clinically Evaluating a Virgin Clubfoot Evaluation. 21st SICOT Conference; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beatson TR, Pearson JR. A method of assessing correction in club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1966;48:40–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponseti IV Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:448–54.

  14. Aronson J, Puskarich CL. Deformity and disability from treated clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:109–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhinav Sinha.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinha, A., Mehtani, A., Sud, A. et al. Evaluation of Ponseti method in neglected clubfoot. IJOO 50, 529–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189597

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.189597

Key words

  • Clubfoot
  • neglected clubfeet
  • Ponseti
  • plaster correction
  • Pirani scoring
  • Dimeglio scoring

MeSH terms

  • Clubfoot
  • plaster of paris
  • neglected diseases
  • prospective studies
  • foot deformities