Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Total knee arthroplasty using subvastus approach in stiff knee

A retrospective analysis of 110 cases

  • Knee Symposium
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Subvastus approach used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to produce an earlier recovery but is not commonly utilized for TKA when the preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee is limited. Subvastus approach is known for its ability to give earlier recovery due to less postoperative pain and early mobilization (due to rapid quadriceps recovery). Subvastus approach is considered as a relative contraindication for TKA in knees with limited ROM due to difficulty in exposure which can increase risk of complications such as patellar tendon avulsion or medial collateral injury. Short stature and obesity are also relative contraindications. Tarabichi successfully used subvastus approach in knees with limited preoperative ROM. However, there are no large series in literature with the experience of the subvatus approach in knees with limited preoperative ROM. We are presenting our experience of the subvastus approach for TKA in knees with limited ROM.

Materials and Methods

We conducted retrospective analysis of patients with limited preoperative ROM (flexion ≤90°) of the knee who underwent TKA using subvastus approach and presenting the 2 years results. There were a total 84 patients (110 knees) with mean age 64 (range 49–79 years) years. The mean preoperative flexion was 72° (range 40°–90°) with a total ROM of 64° (range 36°–90°).

Results

Postoperatively knee flexion improved by mean 38° (P < 0.05) which was significant as assed by Student’s t-test. The mean knee society score improved from 36 (range 20–60) to 80 (range 70–90) postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was one case of partial avulsion of patellar tendon from the tibial tubercle.

Conclusions

We concluded that satisfactory results of TKA can be obtained in knees with limited preoperative ROM using subvastus approach maintaining the advantages of early mobilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farahini H, Moghtadaei M, Bagheri A, Akbarian E. Factors influencing range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2012;14:417–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Li PH, Wong YC, Wai YL. Knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007;15:149–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:626–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2004;17:196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:950–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;451:87–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Naranja RJ Jr, Lotke PA, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty in a previously ankylosed or arthrodesed knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;331:234–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thienpont E. Faster quadriceps recovery with the far medial subvastus approach in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2370–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin TC, Wang HK, Chen JW, Chiu CM, Chou HL, Chang CH. Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty with the subvastus approach allows rapid rehabilitation: A prospective, biomechanical and observational study. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25:557–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung YB, Lee YS, Lee EY, Jung HJ, Nam CH. Comparison of the modified subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2009;33:419–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR. Evaluation of complications associated with six hundred mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89 Suppl 3:76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bridgman SA, Walley G, MacKenzie G, Clement D, Griffiths D, Maffulli N. Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Knee 2009;16:216–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan WM, Li XG, Tang TS, Qian ZL, Zhang Q, Zhang CM. Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Int Med Res 2010;38:890–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarabichi S, Tarabichi Y. Can an anterior quadriceps release improve range of motion in the stiff arthritic knee? J Arthroplasty 2010;25:571–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benoni G, Fredin H. Fibrinolytic inhibition with tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and blood transfusion after knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 86 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:434–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schurman DJ, Matityahu A, Goodman SB, Maloney W, Woolson S, Shi H, et al. Prediction of postoperative knee flexion in Insall-Burstein II total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;353:175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:1278–85.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bradley GW, Freeman MA, Albrektsson BE. Total prosthetic replacement of ankylosed knees. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:179–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr. The stiff knee; ankylosis and flexion. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Knee Arthroplasty 2009;3:145–58.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott RD, Siliski JM. The use of a modified V-Y quadricepsplasty during total knee replacement to gain exposure and improve flexion in the ankylosed knee. Orthopedics 1985;8:45–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vince K, Dorr LD. Total knee arthroplasty: Principles and controversy. Tech Orthop 1988;3:5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laubenthal KN, Smidt GL, Kettelkamp DB. A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 1972;52:34–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kettelkamp DB, Johnson RJ, Smidt GL, Chao EY, Walker M. An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:775–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JM, Moon MS. Squatting following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;313:177–86.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Debette C, Lustig S, Servien E, Lording T, Villa V, Demey G, et al. Total knee arthroplasty of the stiff knee: Three hundred and four cases. Int Orthop 2014;38:285–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Winemaker M, Rahman WA, Petruccelli D, de Beer J. Preoperative knee stiffness and total knee arthroplasty outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1437–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Montgomery WH 3rd, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker MS, Windsor RE. Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees. Am J Knee Surg 1998;11:20–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsu CH, Lin PC, Chen WS, Wang JW. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with stiff knees. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:286–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McAuley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(404):203–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aglietti P, Windsor RE, Buzzi R, Insall JN. Arthroplasty for the stiff or ankylosed knee. J Arthroplasty 1989;4:1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Spicer DD, Curry JI, Pomeroy DL, Badenhausen WE Jr, Schaper LA, Suthers KE, et al. Range of motion after arthroplasty for the stiff osteoarthritic knee. J South Orthop Assoc 2002;11:227–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Bombay Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Nilen A. Shah,  Hitendra Gulabrao Patil, Vinod O. Vaishnav & Abhijit Savale

Authors
  1. Nilen A. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hitendra Gulabrao Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinod O. Vaishnav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abhijit Savale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hitendra Gulabrao Patil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, N.A., Patil, H.G., Vaishnav, V.O. et al. Total knee arthroplasty using subvastus approach in stiff knee. IJOO 50, 166–171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177582

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177582

Key words

MeSH terms

Search

Navigation