Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early results of displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Displaced supracondylar fractures are notorious for difficulty in reduction, maintenance of reduction and frequent involvement of neurovascular structures. No general agreement on the treatment is evident with controversy prevailing regarding the ideal timing of surgery, method of maintenance of reduction and configuration of the pin fixation. A crossed pin configuration, though believed by some to be mechanically more stable than the lateral pins alone, has the risk of ulnar nerve injury due to the medial pin. Lateral pins alone impart less rotational stability to the fracture although it has been attributed mainly to technical errors of pin placement. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of treatment of this fracture using one lateral and one trans-olecranon K-wires or lateral entry K-wires alone.

Materials and Methods

Ninety cases of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 6.7 years (range 3-12 years). The male/female ratio was 5:1 and left side was involved in 70% whereas 30% had right sided injuries. The most common mode of trauma was fall from height with elbow in extension. All the 90 consecutively admitted patients had extension type injury with 73.3% fractures being Gartland type III and 26.7% were type II. Posteromedial displacement was noted in 70% whereas 30% fractures were posterolaterally displaced. In 60 cases, lateral entry wires alone were used whereas, in 30 cases, one lateral and another transolecranon transarticular K-wire was used. K-wires were removed at 3 weeks postoperatively and followup was done at 6 weeks and 12 weeks when they were evaluated according to the criteria described by Flynn. Chi-square test was used as a statistical test of significance to compare results among different variables.

Results

Results were graded according to Flynn’s criteria. Excellent results were achieved in 12 (13.3%), good in 54 (60%), fair in 15 (16.7%) while in nine patients (10%) poor results were obtained.

Conclusions

Both lateral entry K-wires and lateral-trans-olecranon wire techniques provide stable fixation when observing the guidelines for wire placement and consistently satisfactory results can be obtained, both cosmetically and functionally with both the techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilkins KE. The operative management of supracondylar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 1990;21:269–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachman D, Santora S. Orthopedic trauma. In: Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, editors. Textbook of Paediatric Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 1538.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lins RE, Simovitch RW, Waters PM. Pediatric elbow trauma. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:119–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ippolito E, Caterini R, Scola E. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Analysis at maturity of fifty-three patients treated conservatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am) 1986;68:333–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blount WP. Fractures in Children. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pretell-Mazzini J, Rodriguez-Martin J, Auñon-Martin I, Zafra-Jimenez JA. Controversial topics in the management of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2011;6:43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulpuri K, Wilkins K. The treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures: Evidence-based guideline. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32 Suppl 2:S143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Skaggs DL, Hale JM, Bassett J, Kaminsky C, Kay RM, Tolo VT. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A: 735–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Archibald DA, Roberts JA, Smith MG. Transarticular fixation for severely displaced supracondylar fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:147–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years’ experience with long term followup. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:263–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nacht JL, Ecker ML, Chung SM, Lotke PA, Das M. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;177:203–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fowles JV, Kassab MT. Displaced supracondylar fractures of the elbow in children. A report on the fixation of extension and flexion fractures by two lateral percutaneous pins. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56B: 490–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aronson DD, Prager BI. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A modified technique for closed pinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res) 1987;219:174–84.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI. Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:641–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Musa M, Singh S, Wani M, Rawa S, Mir B, Halwai M, et al. Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children - Treatment outcomes following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery 2009; 17:1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Balakumar B, Madhuri V. A retrospective analysis of loss of reduction in operated supracondylar humerus fractures. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:690–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Devkota P, Khan JA, Acharya BM, Pradhan NM, Mainali LP, Singh M, et al. Outcome of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2008;47:66–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SS, Mahar AT, Miesen D, Newton PO. Displaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: Biomechanical analysis of percutaneous pinning techniques. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:440–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wael A, Mohammed A, Boghdady GW, Ali AM. Results of treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children by percutaneous lateral cross-wiring technique. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2008;3:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maity A, Saha D, Roy DS. A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg Res 2012;7:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foead A, Penafort R, Saw A, Sengupta S. Comparison of two methods of percutaneous pin fixation in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2004;12:76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis RT, Gorczyca JT, Pugh K. Supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Comparison of operative treatment methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res) 2000;376:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anmol Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Walia, J.P.S., Brar, B.S. et al. Early results of displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. IJOO 49, 529–535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164039

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164039

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation