Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Supination external rotation ankle fractures

A simpler pattern with better outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Rotational injuries are the most common and usually classified as per the Lauge Hansen classification; with the most common subgroup being the supination external rotation (SER) mechanism. Isolated fractures of the distal fibula (SE2) without associated ligamentous injury are usually treated with a splint or brace and the patient may be allowed to weight bear as tolerated. This study reports the functional outcomes following a stable, low energy, rotational ankle fracture supination external rotation (SER2) when compared to unstable SER4 fractures treated operatively

Materials and Methods: 64 patients who were diagnosed and treated nonoperatively for a stable SER2 ankle fracture were followed prospectively. In the comparison group, 93 operatively treated fibular fractures were extracted from a prospectively collected database and evaluated comparison. Baseline characteristics obtained by trained interviewers at the time of injury included: Patient demographics, short form-36, short musculoskeletal functional assessment (SMFA) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaires. Patients were followed at 3, 6 and 12 months postsurgery. Additional information obtained at each followup point included any complications or evidence on fracture healing. Data were analyzed by the Student’s f-test and theFisher’s Exact Test to compare demographic and functional outcomes between the two cohorts. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results: The average of patients’ age in the stable fracture cohort was 43 versus 45 in the SER4 group. Nearly 64% of the patient population was female when compared with 37% in the operative group. In the SER2 by 6 months all patients had returned to baseline functional status. There were 18 delayed unions (all healed by 6 months). Based on the functional outcome scores all patients had returned to preoperative level. In comparison, SE4 patients had less functional recovery at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05) based on the SMFA scores and at 3, 6 and 12 months based on the AOFAS (P < 0.001) scores. There was no difference in pain levels between the two groups at all time points. There were three nonunions in the SE4 group and six delayed unions.

Conclusions: An SER2 ankle fracture is a relatively benign injury with functional limitations resolving by 3 months while the need for surgical fixation in SER ankle fractures appears to affect lower extremity function to a greater degree for a longer time period. Patients should be counseled as to these expected outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 1996;7:612–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. II. Combined experimental-surgical and experimental-roentgenologic investigations. Arch Surg 1950;60:957–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pakarinen HJ, Flinkkil TE, Ohtonen PP, Ristiniemi JY. Stability criteria for nonoperative ankle fracture management. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32:141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Michelsen JD, Ahn UM, Helgemo SL. Motion of the ankle in a simulated supination-external rotation fracture model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1024–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris J, Fallat L Effects of isolated Weber B fibular fractures on the tibiotalar contact area. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004;43:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yde J, Kristensen KD. Ankle fractures: Supination-eversion fractures of stage IV. Primary and late results of operative and nonoperative treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;51:981–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stufkens SA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Hintermann B, van Dijk CN. Long term outcome after 1822 operatively treated ankle fractures: A systematic review of the literature. Injury 2011;42:119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McGonagle L, Ralte P, Kershaw S. Nonunion of Weber B distal fibula fractures: A case series. Foot Ankle Surg 2010;16:e63–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walsh EF, DiGiovanni C. Fibular nonunion after closed rotational ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:488–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donken CC, Verhofstad MH, Edwards MJ, van Laarhoven CJ. Twenty-one-year followup of supination-external rotation type II-IV (OTA type B) ankle fractures: A retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:e108–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirmal C. Tejwani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tejwani, N.C., Park, J.H. & Egol, K.A. Supination external rotation ankle fractures. IJOO 49, 219–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152487

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152487

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation