Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of characteristics and surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic amyotrophy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) is a rare clinical syndrome resulting from cervical spondylosis. Surgical treatment includes anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), and laminoplasty with or without foraminotomy Some studies indicate that ACDF is an effective method for treating CSA because anterior decompression with or without medial foraminotomy can completely eliminate anterior and/or anterolateral lesions. We retrospectively evaluated outcome of surgical outcome by anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).

Materials and Methods

28 CSA patients, among whom 12 had proximal type CSA and 16 had distal type CSA, treated by ACDF, were evaluated clinicoradiologically The improvement in atrophic muscle power was assessed by manual muscle testing (MMT) and the recovery rate of the patients was determined on the basis of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Patient satisfaction was also examined.

Results

The percentage of patients, who gained 1 or more grades of muscle power improvement, as determined by MMT, was 91.7% for those with proximal type CSA and 37.5% for those with distal type CSA (P < 0.01). The JOA score-based recovery rates of patients with proximal type and distal type CSA were 60.8% and 41.8%, respectively (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was 8.2 for those with proximal type CSA and 6.9 for those with distal type CSA (P < 0.01). A correlation was observed among the levels of improvement in muscle power, JOA score based recovery rate, patient satisfaction and course of disease (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

ACDF can effectively improve the clinical function of patients with CSA and result in good patient satisfaction despite the surgical outcomes for distal type CSA being inferior to those for proximal type CSA. Course of disease is the fundamental factor that affects the surgical outcomes for CSA. We recommend that patients with CSA undergo surgical intervention as early as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Eur Spine J 2011;20:351–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Imajo Y, Kato Y, Kanchiku T, Suzuki H, Taguchi T. Pathology and prognosis of proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: New assessment using compound muscle action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:E476–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gebere-Michael SG, Johnston JC, Metaferia GZ, Wuhib MZ, Fernandez HH. Bilaterally symmetric cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: A novel presentation and review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 2010;290:142–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saringer W, Nöbauer I, Reddy M, Tschabitscher M, Horaczek A. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (uncoforaminotomy) for unilateral radiculopathy: Clinical results of a new technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:685–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Sato R, Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, et al. Anterior and posterior decompressive surgery for progressive amyotrophy associated with cervical spondylosis: A retrospective study of 51 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:330–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Toyoda K, Kato Y, Azuma Y, Kawai S. Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: Assessment of pathophysiology from radiological findings on magnetic resonance imaging and epidurally recorded spinal cord responses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:E185–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Ochi M. Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E728–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Yasunaga Y, Ochi M. Functional diagnosis using multimodal spinal cord evoked potentials in cervical myelopathy. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shibuya R, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto K, Kuratsu S, Kanazawa M, Onoue K, et al. Acute arm paresis with cervical spondylosis: Three case reports. Surg Neurol 2005;63:220–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, Ikuta Y, Yasuda M. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:286–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shinomiya K, Komori H, Matsuoka T, Mutoh N, Furuya K. Neuroradiologic and electrophysiologic assessment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:21–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Imajo Y, Kato Y, Kanchiku T, Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Funaba M, et al. Prediction of surgical outcome for proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy novel mode of assessment using compound action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii and central motor conduction time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E1444–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang JT, Yang da L, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Wang LF, Ding WY. Anterior decompression in the management of unilateral cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Orthopedics 2012;35:e1792–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Srinivasa Rao NV, Rajshekhar V. Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: Incidence and outcome after central corpectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:374–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahdab R, Créange A, Benaderette S, Lefaucheur JP. Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy presenting as dropped head syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111:874–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inui Y, Miyamoto H, Sumi M, Uno K. Clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to prognosis of conservative and surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:794–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y. Long term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Kokubo Y, Yayama T, Kobayashi S, et al. Multivariate analysis of the neurological outcome of surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:564–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tauchi R, Imagama S, Inoh H, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Sato K, et al. Risk factors for a poor outcome following surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: A multicenter study. Eur Spine J 2013;22:156–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wada E, Ohmura M, Yonenobu K. Intramedullary changes of the spinal cord in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:2226–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Li Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, HL., Li, HC., Jiang, JY. et al. Evaluation of characteristics and surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. IJOO 48, 511–517 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139875

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139875

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation