Abstract
Introduction
The 3 bony point relationship of the elbow is an important surface evaluation done in all cases of elbow pathology; its importance is highlighted by the fact that signifcant emphasis is also laid on this during the specialty board examinations. Confusion about the exact inter relationship exists even in the standard orthopaedic books, with various authors labeling it as isosceles, equilateral or a different triangle, without any citation to back this statement.
Materials and Methods
The knowledge of the three bony points relationship in elbow was verifed after a survey of orthopaedic surgeons undertaken by the senior author, produced disparate answers. Most (63%) classifed this as an isosceles triangle. To clarify this further, 200 elbows were prospectively evaluated to measure the distances between these points and the angles were calculated.
Conclusion
Our observations indicate that this triangle is neither isosceles, nor equilateral, but a scalene triangle of unequal sides. There may even be a minimal difference in the 2 sides of the same individual, which has the potential to complicate routine comparison of the two elbows during examination.
Results
The analysis of data revealed that all surgeons were aware of the three bony points relationship; however 21 of the 179 (mostly senior surgeons) did not give too much importance to this evaluation in daily clinical practice. Nine surgeons were not sure what type of triangle was formed, 17 thought it was an equilateral triangle, 40 thought it was some other type of triangle while 113 (63%) thought these points formed an isosceles triangle. This is a refection of the disparity in the perception about this triangle in the orthopaedic community in general.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gray H. The ulna. Gray’s Anatomy. 37th ed., Ch. 3, London, Churchill Livingstone Publishers, 1989. p. 413.
Kulkarni N. Elbow joint. In: Clinical Anatomy for Students; Problem Solving Approach. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Publishers; 2007. p. 63.
Warwick D. The elbow and forearm. In: Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S, editors. Apley’s System of Orthopaedics and Fractures. 8th ed. Hodder Arnold Publishers; 2001. p. 304.
Das S. A Manual of Clinical Surgery. 4th ed. S. Das’s Publications; 1996. p. 139.
Dumontier C. Clinical examination of the elbow. Available from: http://www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/mo77_dumontier/index_us.shtml. Accessed June 2013.
Ebnezar J. Textbook of Orthopaedics. 4th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Publishers; 2010. p. 147.
Magee DJ. The elbow. In: Orthopaedic Physical Assessment. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006. p. 326.
Maheshwari J. Injuries about the elbow. Essential Orthopaedics. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Publishers; 2012. p. 92.
McRae R. Clinical Orthopaedic Examination. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 80.
Pandey S. Clinical Orthopaedic Diagnosis. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Publishers; 2009. p. 133.
Reider B. The Orthopaedic Physical Examination. 2nd ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2004. p. 72.
Vanderkooi M. Village Medical Manual: A Layman’s Guide to Health Care. Vol. 1. California: William Carey Library; 2000. p. 110.
Primary Surgery. Trauma: The elbow: Introduction: Examining the elbow. Vol. 2. Available from: http://www.primary-surgery.org/ps/vol2/html/index.html. Accessed June 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dhillon, M.S., Gopinathan, N.R. & Kumar, V. Misconceptions about the three point bony relationship of the elbow. IJOO 48, 453–457 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139835
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139835