Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Large posteromedial defects encountered in severe varus knees during primary total knee arthroplasty can be treated by cementoplasty, structural bone grafts or metallic wedges. The option is selected depending upon the size of the defect. We studied the outcome of autograft (structural and impaction bone grafting) reconstruction of medial tibial bone defects encountered during primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees.

Materials and Methods: Out of 675 primary varus knees operated, bone defects in proximal tibia were encountered in 54 knees. Posteromedial defects involving 25–40% of the tibial condyle cut surface and measuring more than 5 mm in depth were grafted using a structural graft obtained from cut distal femur or proximal tibia in 48 knees. For larger, peripheral uncontained vertical defects in six cases, measuring >25 mm in depth and involving >40% cut surface of proximal tibial condyle, impaction bone grafting with a mesh support was used.

Results: Bone grafts incorporated in 54 knees in 6 months. There was no graft collapse or stress fractures, loosening or nonunion. The average followup period was 7.8 years (range 5–10 years). We observed an average postoperative increase in the Knee Society Score from 40 to 90 points. There was improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores in terms of pain, stiffness and physical function during activities of daily living.

Conclusion: Bone grafting for defects in primary total knee is justified as it is biological, available then and is cost effective besides preserving bone stock for future revisions. Structural grafts should be used in defects >5 mm deep and involving 25–40% of the cut proximal tibial condyle surface. For larger peripheral vertical defects, impaction bone grafting contained in a mesh should be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lotke PA, Wong RY, Ecker ML. The use of methylmethacrylate in primary total knee replacements with large tibial defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;270:288–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ritter MA, Harty LD. Medial screws and cement: A possible mechanical augmentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:587–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA. Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. A followup study. Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty 1995;321:151–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Sculco TP. Bone grafting of tibial defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:132–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinicalrating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;28:88–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheeless textbook of orthopedics. http://www.wheelesonline.com.

  8. Dorr LD. Bone grafts for bone loss with total knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1989;20:179–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorr LD, Ranawat CS, Sculco TA, McKaskill B. Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty 1986. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laskin RS. Total knee arthroplasty in the presence of large bony defects of the tibia and marked knee instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parks NL, Engh GA. The Ranawat Award. Histology of nine structural bone grafts used in total knee arthroplasty. The Ranawat Award 1997;345:17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, Sun ZH, Tian MQ, Wang P, Wang L. Autologous bone grafting plus screw fixation for medial tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2011;91:2046–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pei Z, Guan ZP, Zhang SL, Li YP, Zhang Z. Autogeneous bone graft in the treatment of total knee arthroplasty for severe genu varus with tibial plateau bone defect. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2011;43:707–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaweda K, Tarczyńska M, Gagala J. The results of primary total knee arthroplasty with bone stock restoration by autologous grafts from resected bony ends. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2006;71:423–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe W, Sato K, Itoi E. Autologous bone grafting without screw fixation for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2006;6:481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rawlinson J, Closkey R, Davis N, Wright T, Windsor R. Stemmed Implants Improve Stability in Augmented Constrained Condylar Knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:2639–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker-Fluegel MW, Windsor RE. Inlay autogeneic bone grafting of tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:93–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Scrobe F. Autologous bone grafting for medial tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991;6:287–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierzchała A, Kusz D. The use of structural autograft for massive bone defects in primary total knee replacement. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2006;8:195–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Altchek D, Sculco TP, Rawlins B. Autogenous bone grafting for severe angular deformity in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989;4:151–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Keska R, Bira M, Witoński D. Primary total knee arthroplasty with structural autologous bone grafting of medial tibial condyle defect in elderly patients: A preliminary report. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2009;74:214–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai X, Wang Y, Wang JF, Zhou YG, Dong JY, Chen JY, et al. Impacted cancellous autograft for reconstructing bone defects of tibial plateau in total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008;88:2907–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C. Impaction, grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 2002;404:145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinal Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharbanda, Y., Sharma, M. Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. IJOO 48, 313–318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.132525

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.132525

Key words

Navigation