Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of bilateral sequential total knee arthroplasty on functional recovery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Main concerns of patients undergoing bilateral surgery is the quantum of pain and the progress of functional recovery. We studied functional recovery in terms of pain, range of motion (ROM), SF12, WOMAC scores and a unique TUG (timed up and go) test for patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (U/L-TKA) and sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty (B/L-TKA).

Materials and Methods

Three groups of 77 consecutive patients (91 knees) were retrospectively compared. They were B/L TKA group (28 knees: 14 patients), Unilateral TKA group with contralateral knee nonoperated i.e., U/L-TKA group (42 knees) and Unilateral TKA with contralateral TKA already done i.e., U/L C/L TKA group (21 knees). Patients were assessed preoperatively and on postoperative days 3, 5, 14, 42, 90 and 1 year.

Results

The WOMAC score was statistically better preoperatively in the U/L C/L TKA group, and SF12 MCS score was statistically better preoperatively in the B/L-TKA group. The TUG test time in the B/L-TKA group was statistically longer on days 3 and 5 as compared to other groups and became comparable by day 14. The TUG score became better than the preoperative value by day 42 in the B/L-TKA group, which took 90 days in other groups.

Conclusion

The early functional recovery of bilateral TKA patient lags behind that of unilateral TKA patient for the first 5 days, becomes equal by the 14th day and remains equal till 1 year after surgery. Bilateral TKA patients regain their preoperative functional status by 6 weeks against 3 months for unilateral TKA. The operative status of the contralateral knee makes no difference to early functional recovery after unilateral TKA. With bilateral TKA, there is no difference in pain and ROM parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forster MC, Bauze AJ, Bailie AG, Falworth MS, Oakeshott RD. A retrospective comparative study of bilateral total knee replacement staged at a one-week interval. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1006–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Horne G, Devane P, Adams K. Complications and outcomes of single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2005;75:734–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jankiewicz JJ, Sculco TP, Ranawat CS, Behr C, Tarrentino S. One-stage versus 2-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994;309:94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Ilstrup DM, Bryan RS. Complications and mortality associated with bilateral or unilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:484–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fick D, Crane T, Shakespeare D. A comparison of bilateral vs. unilateral total knee arthroplasty mobilised using a flexion regime. Knee 2002;9:285–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeni JA Jr, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinical outcomes after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: Comparison to unilateral total knee arthroplasty and healthy controls. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:541–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Powell RS, Pulido P, Tuason MS, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA. Bilateral vs Unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A patient-based comparison of pain levels and recovery of ambulatory skills. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:642–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Bhayde S, Chandra Vadapalli R, Desai D. Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A prospective comparison of early postoperative pain and functional recovery. Knee 2010;17:191–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryu J, Saito S, Honda T. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 1996;1:351–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vincent HK, Omli MR, Vincent KR. Absence of combined effects of anemia and bilateral surgical status on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:207–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lane GJ, Hozack WJ, Shah S, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr, Eng K, Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total knee arthroplasty: Outcomes analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;345:106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farquhar S, Snyder-Mackler L. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: The nonoperated knee predicts function 3 years after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakirhan S, Unver B, Karatosun V. Comparison of early postoperative functional activity levels of patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009;43:478–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend M. Simultaneous bilateral, staged bilateral, and unilateral total knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1532–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M, O’Sullivan JP, Goudreault C, Goudreault M, et al. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:396–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up and Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeung TS, Wessel J, Stratford PW, MacDermid JC. The timed up and go test for use on an inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation ward. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008;38:410–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boonstra MC, De Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N. How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty? Knee 2008;15:390–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Denis M, Moffet H, Caron F, Ouellet D, Paquet J, Nolet L. Effectiveness of continuous passive motion and conventional physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2006;86:174–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988;1:95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Lidgren Ryd L. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from the swedish knee arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:339–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parul Maniar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maniar, R.N., Baviskar, J.V., Singhi, T. et al. Influence of bilateral sequential total knee arthroplasty on functional recovery. IJOO 47, 23–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.106890

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.106890

Key words

Navigation