Acta Theriologica

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 165–176 | Cite as

Diet of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides — a canid with an opportunistic foraging strategy

Article

Abstract

We examined the raccoon dog’s Nyctereutes procyonoides (Gray, 1834) diet in two agricultural landscapes of Germany and compared these results with other diet studies from its native and introduced ranges. The diet composition was influenced as well by the landscape structures as by the seasons: in the waterrich study area 2 amphibians (54.1%) and fish (10.8%) occurred more frequently in the samples. In study area 1 amphibians (19.0%) and invertebrates (69.4%) gained more significance in the diet in summer, whereas in winter samples maize (32.8%) was an important food item. The diet composition shifted according to the availability of different food items. Raccoon dogs, ability to feed temporarily on one food source may possibly cause a serious problem to endangered small populations of birds and amphibians. The review of 81 data sets from nine countries showed that seasons and locality affected the occurrence of most food items. However, comparable to the present study, small mammals, insects and plants were identified as important food items both in native and introduced ranges of the raccoon dog. In regard to its diet composition, gathering foraging strategy and inactivity during winter, the raccoon dog probably preys less often on game animals and birds than the native red fox Vulpes vulpes.

Key words

feeding behaviour invasive species predator food analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahola M., Nordström M., Banks P. B., Laanetu N. and Korpimäki E. 2005. Alien mink predation induces prolonged declines in archipelago amphibians. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 1261–1265. doi: 10.1098/rspb. 2005.3455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous 1995-2008. Deutscher Jagdschutzverband e.V., Vereinigung der deutschen Landesjagdvebände (ed). DJVHandbücher: 1–606.Google Scholar
  3. Ansorge H. 1991. Die Ernährungsökologie des Rotfuchses, Vulpes vulpes, in der Oberlausitz während des Winterhalbjahres. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Görlitz 65 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Ansorge H. 1998. Biologische Daten des Marderhundes aus der Oberlausitz. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Görlitz 70: 47–61.Google Scholar
  5. Asikainen J., Mustonen A. M., Hyvärinen H. and Nieminen P. 2004. Seasonal physiology of the wild raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides). Zoological Science 21: 385–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baltrünaitë L. 2002. Diet composition of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.), pine marten (Martes martes L.) and raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) in clay plain landscape, Lithuania. Acta Zoologica Lithuanica 12: 362–368.Google Scholar
  7. Baltrünaitë L. 2006. Diet and winter habitat use of the red fox, pine marten and raccoon dog in Dzukiya National Park, Lithuania. Acta Zoologica Lithuanica 16: 46–53.Google Scholar
  8. Barbu P. 1972. Beiträge zum Studium des Marderhundes Nyctereutes procyonoides ussuriensis Matschie, 1907, aus dem Donaudelta. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 20: 375- 405.Google Scholar
  9. Bellebaum J. 2002. Einfluss von Predatoren auf den Erfolg von Wiesenbrütern in Brandenburg. Journal für Ornithologie 143: 506–511.Google Scholar
  10. Bellmann H. 1993. Heuschrecken beobachten und bestimmen. Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg: 1–349.Google Scholar
  11. Brohmer P. 2006. Fauna von Deutschland. Verlag Quelle und Meyer, Heidelberg: 1–818.Google Scholar
  12. Brown R., Ferguson J., Lawrence M. and Lees D. 1988. Federn, Spuren & Zeichen Gerstenberg Verlag, Hildesheim: 1–232.Google Scholar
  13. Caut S., Angulo E. and Courchamp F. 2008. Dietary shift of an invasive predator: rats, seabirds and sea turtles. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 428–437. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2664.2007.01438.xPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danilov P. I., Rusakov O. S. and Tumanov I. L. 1979. [Carnivores of the northwest Soviet Union]. Nauka, Leningrad: 5–25. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  15. Drygala F., Mix H. M., Stier N. and Roth M. 2000. Preliminary findings from ecological studies of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in eastern Germany. Zeitschrift für ökologie und Naturschutz 9: 147–152.Google Scholar
  16. Drygala F., Stier N. and Roth M. 2002. Erste Ergebnisse zur Nahrungsökologie, Home-Range und Habitatnutzung des Marderhundes (Nyctereutes procyonoides) — eines invasiven Caniden in Ostdeutschland. Artenschutzreport 12: 48–54.Google Scholar
  17. Engl M., Leibl F. and Mooser K. 2004. Bestandsentwicklung, Brutbiologie und Reproduktionserfolg des Großen Brachvogels Numenius arquata im Mettenbacher und Grießenbacher Moos, Kreis Landshut. Ornithologischer Anzeiger 43: 217–235.Google Scholar
  18. Geller M. H. 1959. [Biology of the ussuri raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray), acclimatized in northwest parts of European parts of the Soviet Union]. Trudy Nauchno-issledovatelskogo Instituta Selskogo Hozaistva Krainego Severa 9. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  19. Geptner V. G., Naumov N. P., Jürgenson P. B., Sludski A. A., Cirkova A. F. and Bannikov A. G. 1974. Band II. Seekühe und Raubtiere. [In: Die Säugetiere der Sowjetunion. V. G. Geptner and N. P. Naumov, eds]. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena: 67–97.Google Scholar
  20. Ivanova G. I. 1962. [Comparison of the diets of the red fox, badger and raccoon dog in Voronez National Park]. Uchenye Zapiski, Moskovskii Gosudarstvennii Pedagogicheskii Institut im. V. I. Lenina 186: 210–256. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  21. Jědrzejewska B. and Jědrzejewski W. 1998. Predation in vertebrate communities, the Białowieża Primeval Forest as a case study. Ecological Studies135. Springer Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg: 1–450.Google Scholar
  22. Judin V. G. 1977. [Raccoon dog in Primorje and Priamurje]. Nauka, Moscow: 76–98. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  23. Kauhala K. 1993. Growth, size, and fat reserves of the raccoon dog in Finland. Acta Theriologica 38: 139–50.Google Scholar
  24. Kauhala K. and Auniola M. 2001. Diet of raccoon dogs in summer in the Finnish archipelago. Ecography 24: 151–156. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240205.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kauhala K. and Helle E. 1995. Population ecology of the raccoon dog in Finland & a synthesis. Wildlife Biology 1: 3–9.Google Scholar
  26. Kauhala K., Kaunisto M. and Helle E. 1993. Diet of the raccoon dog, Nyctereutes procyonoides, in Finland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 58: 129–136.Google Scholar
  27. Kauhala K., Laukkanen P. and von Rége I. 1998. Summer food composition and food niche overlap of the raccoon dog, red fox and badger in Finland. Ecography 21: 457–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00436.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kauhala K. and Saeki M. 2004. Raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides. [In: Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs. Status survey and conservation action plan. C. Sillero-Zubiri, M. Hoffmann and D. W. Macdonald, eds]. IUCN Publication Services, Cambridge: 136–142.Google Scholar
  29. Kobylińska J. 1996. The red fox and raccoon dog in wetlands of the Biebrza River Valley & Food composition and burrow use. European Journal of Wildlife Research 1: 186–189.Google Scholar
  30. Kolosov A. M., Lavrov N. P. and Naumov S. P. 1965. [Biology of game mammals in the Soviet Union]. Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow: 69–76. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  31. Korhonen H. 1988. Voluntary regulation of energy balance in farmed raccoon dogs. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A: Comparative Physiology 89: 219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Korneev A. I. 1954. [Raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray in Ukraine, results of acclimatization]. Trudy zoomuzea Kiev: 4. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  33. Kritskaya T. I. 1961. [Impact of raccoon dog on the community of Manychkoj steppe]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 40: 788–790. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  34. Lavrov N. P. 1971. [Results of raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) introductions in different parts of the Soviet Union]. Trudy Kafedry Biologii MGZPI 29: 101–160. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  35. Litzbarski H. 2002. Rabenvögel und Wiesenbrüterschutz in Brandenburg. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung 27: 285–290.Google Scholar
  36. Melter J. and Südbeck P. 2004. Bestandsentwicklung und Bruterfolg von Wiesenlimikolen unter Vertragsnaturschutz: “Stollhammer Wisch” 1993–2002. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Niedersachsen 41: 50–74.Google Scholar
  37. Morozov V. F. 1947. [Results of raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) acclimatization in Leningrad and Novgorod areas]. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta Okhotnichego Promysla Ministerstva Zagotovok SSSR 8: 111–124. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  38. Morozov V. F. 1953. [Acclimatization of ussuri raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) as an example of the success of a fur animal in the European part of the Soviet Union]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 32: 524–533. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  39. Müller H. J. 1986. Bestimmung wirbelloser Tiere im Gelände. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart: 1–280.Google Scholar
  40. Naaber J. 1971. [Raccoon dog]. Eesti Lodus 14: 449–455. [In Estonian]Google Scholar
  41. Naaber J. 1974. [Red fox and raccoon dog in our nature]. [In: Jaht ja Ulukid. Eesti NSV jahimeeste seltsi aastaraamat 1969–1972. G. Merisalu, ed]. Eesti Jahimeeste Selts, Tallinn: 102–115. [In Estonian]Google Scholar
  42. Nasimovič A. A. and Isakov J. A. (eds) 1985. [Arctic fox, red fox and raccoon dog: distribution of populations, ecology and preservation]. Nauka, Moscow: 116–145. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  43. Niethammer J. and Krapp F. (eds) 1978. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Band 1. Nagetiere I. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden: 1–476.Google Scholar
  44. Niethammer J. and Krapp F. (eds) 1982. Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Band 2/I Nagetiere II. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden: 1–638.Google Scholar
  45. Nordström M., Högmander J., Nummelin J., Laine J., Laanetu N. and Korpimäki E. 2002. Variable responses of waterfowl breeding populations to long-term removal of introduced American mink. Ecography 25: 385–394. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250401.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nordström M., Laine J., Ahola M. and Korpimäki E. 2003. Reduced nest defence intensity and improved breeding success in terns as responses to removal of non-native American mink. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 55: 454–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nowak E. 1993. Nyctereutes procyonoides (Gray, 1834) — Marderhund. [In: Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. M. Stubbe and F. Krapp, eds]. Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden: 215–248.Google Scholar
  48. Obtemperanskij S. I. 1953. [Comparison of the diet of the raccoon dog, red fox and badger in Voronez area]. Byulleten Obshchestva estestvocspytatelec, Voronezh 10: 97–100.Google Scholar
  49. Ognev S. I. 1962. Nyctereutes procyonoides ussuriensis Matschie, Ussurian raccoon dog. [In: Mammals of Eastern Europe and Northern Asia. Carnivora, Vol. II. S. I. Ognev, ed]. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem: 260–266.Google Scholar
  50. Opermanis O., Mednis A. and Bauga I. 2001. Duck nests and predators: interaction, specialisation and possible management. Wildlife Biology 7: 87–96.Google Scholar
  51. Park K. 2004. Assessment and Management of invasive alien predators. Ecology and Society 9: 12.Google Scholar
  52. Pavlov M. P. and Kiris I. B. 1963. [Diet of raccoon dogs in marshlands of Temruk]. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta Zhivotnogo Sypya I Pushniny 20: 68–84. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  53. Popov V. A. 1954. [Results of the study of animals in the flooding zone in Kuibyshev area]. Trudy Kazanskogo filiala AN SSSR. Seriya Biologicheskikh Nauk, No 3. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  54. Prüsaitë J. 1960. [Expansion and feeding habits of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray) in Lithuania]. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SSR, series C 2: 125–140. [In Lithuanian]Google Scholar
  55. Reig S. and Jędrzejewski W. 1988. Winter and early spring food of some carnivores in the Białowieża National Park, Eastern Poland. Acta Theriologica 33: 57–65.Google Scholar
  56. Remonti L., Balestrieri A. and Prigioni C. 2007. Role of fruits in the diet of small mustelids (Mustela spp.) from the western Italian Alps. European Journal of Wildlife Research 53: 35–39. doi: 10.1007/sl0344-006-0058-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rukovskij N. N. 1950. [Material of the diet of the raccoon dog in Astrakhan province]. Bulleten M. O-va Isp. Prirody, Otd. Biologii 55: 33–34. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  58. Salo P. 2009. On lethal and nonlethal impacts of native, alien and intraguild predators — Evidence of top-down control. PhD thesis, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser. AII, Tom. 240, University of Turku, Finland: 1–102.Google Scholar
  59. Samusenko É. G. and Golodushko B. Z. 1961. [Nutrition of the raccoon dog in Belarus.] [In: Fauna and ecology of terrestrial vertebrates of Belarus. N. D. Ges, ed]. Izdatelstvo Ministerstva vysshego, srednego specialnogo i professionalnogo obrazovaniya BSSR, Minsk: 71–82.Google Scholar
  60. Schneeweiß N. 2002. Rotbauchunke — Bombina bombina. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Brandenburg 11: 108–109.Google Scholar
  61. Schwan C. 2003. Nahrungsökologische Untersuchungen an Marderhunden (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Gray, 1834) und Waschbären (Procyon lotor, Linneus, 1758) in ihrem nordöstlichen Verbreitungsgebiet Deutschlands. PhD thesis, Technical University of Dresden/Tharandt: 1–186.Google Scholar
  62. Schwarz S., Sutor A. and Litzbarski H. 2002. Nachweise des Marderhundes (Nyctereutes procyonoides) im Europäischen Vogelschutzgebiet (SPA) Havelländisches Luch. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Brandenburg 11: 198–199.Google Scholar
  63. Sidorovich V. E., Polozov A. G., Lauzhiel G. O. and Krasko D. A. 2000. Dietary overlap among generalist carnivores in relation to the impact of the introduced raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides on native predators in northern Belarus. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 65: 271–285.Google Scholar
  64. Sidorovich V. E., Solovej I. A., Sidorovich A. A. and Dyman A. A. 2008. Seasonal and annual variation in the diet of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in northern Belarus: the role of habitat type and family group. Acta Theriologica 53: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sorokin M. G. 1956. [Biological and morphological studies of the raccoon dog, acclimatized to Kalinin province]. Uch. Zap. Kalinin. Gos. Pedagog. Inst. 20: 125–130. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  66. Trusalova P. 1959. [Acclimatization and biology of the racoon dog in northern Caucasus]. Tr. Kavkazsk gos. Zapovedn, Maikop 5: 39–61. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  67. Viro P. and Mikkola H. 1981. Food composition of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray, 1834 in Finland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 46: 20–26.Google Scholar
  68. Włodek K. and Krzywiński P. 1986. Zu Biologie und Verhalten des Marderhundes (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Polen. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaften 32: 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woloch A. and Roženko N. 2007. Die Akklimatisation des Marderhundes (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray, 1834) in der Südukraine. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung 32: 409–422.Google Scholar
  70. Zabala J. and Zuberogoitia J. 2003. Badger, Meles meles (Mustelidae, Carnivora), diet assessed through scat-analysis: a comparison and critique of different methods. Folia Zoologica 52: 23–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Astrid Sutor
    • 1
  • Kaarina Kauhala
    • 2
  • Hermann Ansorge
    • 3
  1. 1.Albrecht-Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management Institute of Forest ZoologyFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research InsituteTurku Game and Fisheries ResearchTurkuFinland
  3. 3.State Museum of Natural History GörlitzGörlitzGermany

Personalised recommendations