Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 72, Issue 6, pp 681–686 | Cite as

Size Effect of Defects on the Mechanical Properties of Graphene

Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Graphene, a two-dimensional material, has been studied and utilized for its excellent material properties. In reality, achieving a pure single-crystalline structure in graphene is difficult, so usually graphene may have various types of defects in it. Vacancies, Stone-Wales defects, and grain boundaries can drastically change the material properties of graphene. Graphene with vacancy defects has been of interest because it is a two-dimensional analogy of three-dimensional porous materials. It has efficient material properties, and can function as a part of modern devices. The mechanical properties have been studied by using molecular dynamics for either a single vacancy defect with various sizes or multiple vacancy defects with same defect ratios. However, it is not clear which one has more influence on the mechanical properties between the size of the defects and the defect ratio. Therefore, we investigated the hole-size effect on the mechanical properties of single-crystalline graphene at various defect ratios. A void defect with large size can have a rather high tensile modulus with a low fracture strain compared to a void defect with small size. We numerically found that the tensile properties of scattered single vacancies is similar to that of amorphous graphene. We suspect that this is due to the local orbital change of the carbon atoms near the boundary of the void defects, so-called the interfacial phase.

Keywords

Graphene Hole defects Molecular dynamics Mechanical properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T. C. Dinadayalane and J. Leszczynski, Struct. Chem. 21, 1155 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, G. H. B. Dommett, K. M. Kohlhaas, E. J. Zimney, E. A. Stach, R. D. Piner, S. B. T. Nguyen and R. S. Ruoff, Nature 442, 282 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Banhart, J. Kotakoski and A. V. Krasheninnikov, ACS Nano 5, 26 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Liu, M. Qing, Y. Wang and S. Chen, J. Mat. Sci. Tech. 31, 599 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Liu, P. Ming and J. Li, Phys. Rev. B 76, 064120 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. W. Jiang, J. S. Wang and B. Li, Phys. Rev. B 80, 113405 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Ansar, S. Ajori and B. Motevalli, Superlattices and Microstructures 51, 274 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. Hao, D. Fang and Z. Xu, App. Phys. Lett. 99, 041901 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. C. Wang, C. Yan, L. Maa, N. Hub and M. W. Chen, Comp. Mat. Sci. 54, 236 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Ansari, B. Motevalli, A. Montazeri and S. Ajori, Sol. State Comm. 151, 1141 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Ito and S. Okamoto, Proc. of the Int. Multi. Conf. of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2012 1, IMECS 2012 (Hong Kong, March 14-16, 2012).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Yang, Res. Mat. Sci. 2, 50 (2013).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. A. Anastasi, K. Ritos, G. Cassar and M. K. Borg, Mol. Simul. 42, 1502 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. J. Park, G. H. Ryu and J. H. Lee, Appl. Microsc. 45, 107 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Plimpton, J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Y. Park, S. Hyun and E. Koo, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 115202 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3125 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simulation TeamKorea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and TechnologyJinjuKorea

Personalised recommendations