Abstract
A collimator is a key component of gamma cameras, which affects imaging performance significantly. Recently, pixelated scintillator arrays are widely applied in the development of highresolution gamma cameras, instead of monolithic scintillator blocks. Therefore, combining the collimator and the pixelated scintillator has been a crucial factor in achieving good imaging performance. In this study, we investigated the effects of the shape and position of a collimator hole on the image resolution of a gamma camera with a pixelated scintillator. We designed a pixel-matched collimator and a low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimator with hexagonal shaped holes that have the same collimator geometrical efficiency. Simulation experiments were performed with a Monte Carlo simulation package (GATE v7.0). For both types of collimator, camera sensitivity was measured for validating the collimator efficiency, and planar images were obtained to measure spatial resolution, with changing the line profile angle based on the septa direction. Camera sensitivities for both collimators were equivalent (difference = 1.76 ± 0.51%). In contrast to the case of the pixel-matched collimator, in the case of the LEHR collimator, as the angle of the line profile varied, the spatial resolution showed a difference at each profile angle. In the case when two collimator holes symmetrically matched with one scintillator pixel, the spatial resolution showed a 64.87% difference in its maximum and a position distortion of 26.06% from the original source position, according to the profile angle, compared to the other unmatched cases. These results showed that using a pixel-matched collimator in gamma camera systems employing a pixelated scintillator is essential for the exact delineation of small regions using high resolution gamma camera imaging
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. M. Fowler, J. Nucl. Med. 55, 177 (2014).
E. V. Garcia, T. L. Faber and F. P. Esteves, J. Nucl. Med. 52, 210 (2011).
L. Vermeeren, R. A. V. Olmos, W. M. C. Klop, A. J. Balm and M. W. van den Brekel, J. Nucl. Med. 51, 700 (2010).
M. Mouden et al., Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 41, 956 (2014).
V. Koulikov, H. Lerman, M. Kesler and E. Even-Sapir, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging Research 5, 63 (2015).
R. Barquero et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 909 (2017).
C. Bouckaert, S. Vandenberghe and R. Van Holen, Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 7521 (2014).
S. L. Bugby, J. E. Lees, B. S. Bhatia and A. C. Perkins, Phys. Med. 30, 331 (2014).
R. J. Palyo, A. J. Sinusas and Y. H. Liu, J. Nucl. Med. 57, 893 (2016).
M. F. Smith, Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 15, 387 (2013).
M. F. Smith, S. Majewski and A. G. Weisenberger, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50, 321 (2003).
C. Beijst, M. Elschot, M. A. Viergever and H. W. de Jong, J. Nucl. Med. 56, 476 (2015).
S. Yamamoto et al., Nuc. Instrum. Methods. Phy. Res. Sect. A 821, 28 (2016).
S. Yamamoto, H. Watabe, Y. Kanai, K. Kato and J. Hatazawa, Ann. Nucl. Med. 28, 232 (2014).
M. Rozler, H. Liang and W. Chang, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 5, 1831 (2012).
S. Yamamoto et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 7555 (2011).
A. Suzuki et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 2199 (2013).
P. Raghunathan et al., IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (San Juan, USA, October 23 - 29, 2005), p. 2001.
M. Bocher et al., Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37, 1887 (2010).
K. Erlandsson, E. Kacperski, D. van Gramberg and B. F. Hutton, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 2635 (2009).
D. Lazaro et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 271 (2004).
D. Loudos et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54, 454 (2007).
B. Arsenali, K. G. Gilhuijs, M. A. Viergever and H. W. de Jong, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 63, 2527 (2016).
A. L. Weinmann, C. B. Hruska and M. K. O’Connor, Med. Phys. 36, 845 (2009).
S. R. Cherry, J. A. Sorenson and M. E. Phelps, Physics in Nuclear Medicine 4th edition (Saunders, Philadelphia, 2012), p. 223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, M., Bae, J.K., Kim, K.M. et al. Effects of Varying Matching Between Collimator Hole and Scintillator Pixel on Gamma Camera Image Resolution. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 72, 455–461 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.72.455
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.72.455