Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 71, Issue 12, pp 1064–1068 | Cite as

Accurate evaluation of modulation transfer function using the Fourier shift theorem

  • Yong Gwon Kim
  • Yeunchul RyuEmail author


Accurate determination of the line spread function (LSF) on the basis of the edge processing algorithm in X-ray imaging systems is one of the most basic procedures for evaluating the performance of such systems. Extensive research has been focused on algorithms for the precise or fast measurement of the LSF in digital X-ray systems. Most of the standard methods for evaluating the performance of an imaging system are based on a fully digitalized radiographic system or a film-based system. However, images obtained by computed radiography (CR), which converts a captured analog signal into a digital image through an analog-to-digital converting scanner, show the combined characteristics of analog and digital imaging systems. Fundamentally, the characteristics of digital imaging systems differ substantially from those of film imaging systems because of their different methods of acquiring and displaying image data. In addition, a system with both analog and digital component has characteristics that differ from those of both digital and analog systems. In this research, we present a new modulation transfer function (MTF) that mimics the existing MTF in terms of measurement but satisfies existing standard protocols through modification of the hypothesis contents. In the case of the LSF and the point spread function measured with a CR system, the developed edge algorithm shows better performance than the conventional methods. We also demonstrate the usefulness of this method in an actual measurement with a CR digital X-ray imaging system.


Modulation transfer function (MTF) X-ray imaging Line spread function (LSF) Edge algorithm 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    K. Rossmann, Radiology 93, 257 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Rossmann, Radiology 90, 863 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Bushberg, J. Seibert, M. Leidholdt, Jr. and J. Boone, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Second ed. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. H. Barret and W. Swindell, Radiological imaging: the theory of image formation, detection and processing (Academic Press, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    N. Ulrich, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 114, 32 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Samei, Advances in Digital Radiography: RSNA categorical course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics (2003), p 37.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Samei, M. J. Flynn and D. D. Reimann, Med. Phys. 25, 102 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. T. Dobbins, Med. Phys. 22, 171 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. R. Granfors and R. Aufrichtig, Med. Phys. 27, 1324 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. F. Greene, C. W. Hartley, P. N. D. Dupuy and M. Chinader. J. Archaeol. Sci. 78, 120 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    International Electrotechnical Commission, International standard IEC62220-1: Medical electrical equipment -Characteristics of digital imaging devices-Part 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency. (Geneva, Switzerland, 2003).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Bracesell, The Fourier transform and its applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Y. C. Ryu, Using Morphological Filter for Accurate Elimination of Scattering Effects in Line Spread Function and Modulation Transfer Function, J. Koream Phys. Soc. (submitted 2017).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiological ScienceKonyang UniversityDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Radiological ScienceGachon UniversityIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations