Abstract
We used a spectrophotometer to compare the dosimetric properties of two non-scattering (radiochromic) gel dosimeters: a non-scattering gel dosimeter developed in-house and a PRESAGE™ gel dosimeter. We evaluated the dosimetric characteristics, including spectral absorption, dose linearity, reproducibility, and dose rate dependency of the two gel dosimeters. The non-scattering gel and the PRESAGE™ gel dosimeters showed peak sensitivity at wavelengths of 600 nm and 630 nm, respectively. Over a range of doses the best dose linearities of the non-scattering and the PRESAGE™ gel dosimeters resulted in R2 values of 0.99 at wavelengths of 600 nm and 630 nm, respectively. The reproducibility and dose-rate dependence of each of the two gel dosimeters were within the range of ±3 %. Our results revealed that the peak sensitivities of the two radiochromic gel dosimeters were significantly different; the in-house non-scattering gel dosimeter demonstrated peak sensitivity at a wavelength of 600 nm while the PRESAGE™ gel dosimeter had peak sensitivity at a wavelength of 630 nm. We confirmed that for 3D gel dosimetry, the in-house non-scattering gel dosimeter had a more stable dose response compared with a commercial non-scattering gel dosimeter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Xing, B. Thorndyke, E. Schreibmann, Y. Yang, T. F. Li, G. Y. Kim, G. Luxton and A. Koong, Med. Dosim. 31, 91 (2006).
B. Steven, B. Jerry and K. Jordan, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 70, 1281 (2008).
M. Oldham, L. Kim and G. Hugo, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 57, 138 (2005).
P. A. Jursinic and B. E. Nelms, Med. Phys. 30, 870 (2003).
S. Lee et al., J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 13, 157 (2012).
G. S. Ibbott, D. S. Followill, H. A. Molineu, J. R. Lowenstein, P. E. Alvarez and J. E. Roll, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71, S71 (2008).
S. J. Doran, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67, 393 (2009).
J. C. Lee, A. R. Kim, Y. H. Ji, and S. Kwon, Progress in Medical Physics 27, 72 (2016).
Y. Murakami et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 2301 (2007).
Y. D. Deene et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 43, 116 (2000).
C. Baldock et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 55, R1 (2010).
M. J. Maryanski, J. C. Gore, R. P. Kennan and R. J. Schulz, Magn. Reson. Imaging 11, 253 (1993).
G. Massillon-JL, R. Minniti, C. G. Soares, M. J. Maryanski and S. Robertson, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68, 144 (2010).
Y. D. Deene, C. Hurley, A. Venning, K. Vergote, M. Mather, B. J. Healy and C. Baldock, Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3441 (2002).
Y. D. Deene, K. Vergote, C. Claeys and C. De Wagter, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 653 (2006).
A. J. Venning, K. N. Nitschke, P. J. Keall and C. Baldock, Med. Phys. 32, 1047 (2005).
S. J. Cho et al., J. Korean Phys. Soc. 51, 1798 (2007).
P. Y. Guo, J. A. Adamovics and M. Oldham, Med. Phys. 33, 1338 (2006).
J. Adamovics and M. J. Maryanski, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 120, 107 (2006).
N. Krstajic, P. Wai, J. Adamovics and S. Doran. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3, 244 (2004).
J. Adamovics and M. J. Maryanski, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3, 172 (2004).
K. Jordan, and N. Avvakumov, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 6773 (2009).
S. Babic, J. Battista and K. Jordan, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 6791 (2009).
M. A. Beroa, W. B. Gilboyb and P. M. Gloverb, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 61, 433 (2001).
J. Solc, and V. Spevácek, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 5095 (2009).
K. Jordan and N. Avvakumov, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 6773 (2009).
T. Gorjiara, R. Hill, Z. Kuncic, S. Bosi1 and C. Baldock, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 57, 250 (2010).
S. H. Lee, J. Kim, S. J. Shim, K. H. Chang, S. Lim, H. D. Huh, D. O. Shin and S. J. Cho, J. Korean. Phys. Soc. 64, 1063 (2014).
K. H. Chang et al., J. Korean. Phys. Soc. 64, 740 (2014).
J. Korppi-Tommola and R. W. Yip, Cand. J. Chem. 59, 191 (1980).
Y. Maruyama and H. Ishikawa Mand Satozono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6257 (1996).
L. M. Lewis and G. L. Indig, Dyes Pigments 46, 145 (2000).
K. H. Chang et al., J. Korean Phys. Soc 51, 1194 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, K.H., Ji, Y., Lee, S. et al. Basic radiological characteristics of a non-scattering gel dosimeter for 3D dosimetry. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 69, 1694–1699 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.69.1694
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.69.1694