Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison study of the ridge filter parameter by using FLUKA and GEANT4 simulation codes

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the parameter optimization of the ridge filter’s thickness for carbon-ion therapy by using a Monte Carlo simulation. For this study, a ridge filter was designed for the spreadout Bragg peak (SOBP) by considering the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The thickness, height, and width of the ridge filter were designed by using the FLUKA and the GEANT4 codes, and we analyzed and compared the results of the physical dose distributions for the FLUKA and the GEANT4 codes. The results showed that the minimum width of the groove for the ridge filter should be at least 0.5 cm for an appropriate biological dose. The SOBP sections were 8 cm, 9 cm, and 10 cm, respectively, when the heights were 3.5 cm, 4.0 cm, and 4.5 cm. The height of the ridge filter was designed to be associated with the SOBP width. Also, the results for the FLUKA and the GEANT4 codes showed that the average value of the difference was 3% and that the maximum error was 5%; however, the trends were similar. Therefore, the height and the width of the groove for the ridge filter are important parameters for deciding the length and the plateau of the SOBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Hirao et al., Nucl. Phys. A 538, 541c (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. Castro, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 34, 45 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Haberer et al., Radiother. Oncol. 73, S186–90 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Tsujii et al., J. Radiat. Res. 48, A1 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Kanai et al., Radiat. Res. 147, 78 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Akagi et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 48, N301 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Hara et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 1717 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Chu et al., Rev. Sci. Instru. 64, 2055 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Kanai et al., Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 44, 201 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Ferrari et al., FLUKA: a multi-particle transport code, CERN 2005-10, INFN/TC 05/11, SLAC-R-773 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Battistoni et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 626-627, S191 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Sakama et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 6615 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wongyun Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y., Shin, J., Cho, S. et al. A comparison study of the ridge filter parameter by using FLUKA and GEANT4 simulation codes. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 96–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.96

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.96

Keywords

Navigation