Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of dose accuracy between film and two-dimensional detectors in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We constructed seven intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans for prostate cancer (49 irradiation fields which contained seven randomly-sampled patients and seven fields) and evaluated the dose distributions by using a radiochromic film (EBT3 film) and a 2D detector. We superposed the calculated dose distribution of the IMRT treatment plan on EBT3 film and the 2D detector results and then compared those with the γ-analysis pass rate. The relative positions of the beam and the detector were varied; the results of the analysis of the superior-inferior (SI) direction potentially differed, depending on the detector position, under an irradiation beam with the same fluence map. The detector was moved over a range of’ 8 mm in the SI direction in 1-mm step increments, measurement were made at each position, and the results were analyzed. The γ-analysis compared the dose distributions from EBT3 film and the radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) for each patient and field; the pass rate with the γ-analysis from 98 to 100% was 2.04%. When we compared the dose distributions of the 2D detector and the RTPS, the pass rate from 98 to 100% was 63.2%. The mean values for the ?-analysis pass rates for EBT3 film and the 2D detector were 94.2 and 97.6%, respectively. Volume averaging of the data indicated a mean pass rate and standard deviation of 98.6 and 0.91%, respectively, and a pass rate of more than 96% for all positions. A 2D detector can, therefore, be used as an alternative apparatus for IMRT dose verification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Miyazawa, Jpn. J. Rad. Tech. 62, 1428 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. Butsun, T. Cheung and P. K. N. Yu, Australa’s Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 29, 281 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. J. van Battum, D. Hoffmans and H. Piersma, Med. Phys. 35, 704 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. L. D. Wolfsberger, M. Wagar and P. Nisch, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 11, 241 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Boggula, M. Birkner and F. Lohr, Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 7163 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Shimohigashi, F. Araki, H. Tominaga, J. Sakata and K. Kawasaki, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 13, 198 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. A. Jursinic and B. E. Nelms, Med. Phys. 30, 870 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. B. Buonamici et al., Med. Phys. 34, 1372 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. G. Li, G. Yan and C. Liu, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 10, 62 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, The Lancet 327, 307 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O. A. Zeidan, S. A. Stephenson and S. L. Meeks, Med. Phys. 33, 4064 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Tominaga, S. Tajiri and K. Kawasaki, Jpn. J. Rad. Tech. 62, 1193 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. V. Klassen, L. V. Zwan and J. Cygler, Med. Phys. 24, 1924 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Nakaguchi, F. Araki, S. Saiga, T. Kouno, M. Maruyama, K. Kakei, N. Nagasue and M. Hashida, Jpn. J. Rad. Tech. 4, 443 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajime Monzen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onishi, Y., Nakayama, S., Watanabe, S. et al. Comparison of dose accuracy between film and two-dimensional detectors in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 89–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.89

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.89

Keywords

Navigation