Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the collimator angle on dosimetric verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The collimator is usually rotated when planning volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) due to the leakage of radiation between the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaves. We studied the effect of the collimator angle on the results of dosimetric verification of VMAT plans for head and neck patients. We studied VMAT plans for 10 head and neck patients. We made two sets of VMAT plans for each patient. Each set was composed of 10 plans with collimator angles of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 degrees. Plans in the first set were optimized individually, and plans in the second set shared the 30-degree collimator-angle optimization. The two sets of plans were verified by using the 2-dimensional ion chamber array MatriXX (IBA Dosimetry, Germany). The comparisons between the calculation and the measurements were made by using a γ-index analysis. The γ-index (2%/2 mm) and (3%/3 mm) passing rates had negative correlations with the collimator angle. The maximum difference between γ-index (3%/3 mm) passing rates of different collimator angles for each patient ranged from 1.46% to 5.60% with an average of 3.67%. There were significant differences (maximum 5.6%) in the passing rates for different collimator angles. The results suggested that the accuracy of the delivered dose depended on the collimator angle. These findings are informative when choosing a collimator angle for VMAT plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. K. Lee, C. W. Yip, F. C. Cheung, A. K. Leung, R. M. Chau and R. K. Ngan, Med. Dosim. 39, 44 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. W. K. Kan, W. Wong, L. H. T. Leung, P. K. N. Yu, R. W. K. So and A. C. K. Cheong, J. Appl. Clin. Medi. Phys. 13, 6 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. A. Syam Kumar, R. Holla, P. Sukumar, S. Padmanaban and N. Vivekanandan, Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 8, 87 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Holt, D. V. Gestel, M. P. Arends, E. W. Korevaar, D. Schuring, M. C. Kunze-Busch, R. JW. Louwe and C. Vliet-Vroegindeweij, Radiat. Oncol. 8, 26 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Alvarez-Moret, F. Pohl, O. Koelbl and B. Dobler, Raiat. Oncol. 5, 110 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Lee, P. Chao, H. Ting, S. Lo, Y. Wang, C. Tuan, F. Fang and T. Su, J. Appl. Clin. Medi. Phys. 12, 4 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. X. Jin, J. Yi, Y. Zhou, H. Yan, C. Han and C. Xie, Med. Dosim. 38, 418 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Herzen, M. Todorovic, F. Cremers, V. Platz, D. Albers, A. Bartels and R. Schmidt, Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 1197 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. D. Wolfsberger, M. Wagar, P Nitsch, M. S. Bhagwat and P. Zygmanski, J. Appl. Clin. Medi. Phys. 11, 1 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Rao, W. Yang, F. Chen, K. Sheng, J. Ye, V. Mehta, D. Shepard and D. Cao, Med. Phys. 37, 1350 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Korreman, J. Medin and F. Kjaer-Kristoffersen, Acta Oncologica. 45, 185 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Stasi, S. Bresciani, A. Miranti, A. Maggio, V. Sapino and P. Gabriele, Med. Phys. 39, 7626 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. A. Ezzell et al., Med. Phys. 36, 5359 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. C. Ling, P. Zhang, Y. Archambault, J. Bocanek, G. Tang, M. Phil and T. Losasso, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 72, 575 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Okumura, Y. Obata, K. Shimomura, M. Tamura and Y. Nishimura, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 3101 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dahl Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y.H., Park, H.R., Kim, W.T. et al. Effect of the collimator angle on dosimetric verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 243–247 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.243

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.243

Keywords

Navigation