Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a new metal artifact reduction algorithm by using an edge preserving method for CBCT imaging

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CT (computed tomography) images, metal materials such as tooth supplements or surgical clips can cause metal artifact and degrade image quality. In severe cases, this may lead to misdiagnosis. In this research, we developed a new MAR (metal artifact reduction) algorithm by using an edge preserving filter and the MATLAB program (Mathworks, version R2012a). The proposed algorithm consists of 6 steps: image reconstruction from projection data, metal segmentation, forward projection, interpolation, applied edge preserving smoothing filter, and new image reconstruction. For an evaluation of the proposed algorithm, we obtained both numerical simulation data and data for a Rando phantom. In the numerical simulation data, four metal regions were added into the Shepp Logan phantom for metal artifacts. The projection data of the metal-inserted Rando phantom were obtained by using a prototype CBCT scanner manufactured by medical engineering and medical physics (MEMP) laboratory research group in medical science at Ewha Womans University. After these had been adopted the proposed algorithm was performed, and the result were compared with the original image (with metal artifact without correction) and with a corrected image based on linear interpolation. Both visual and quantitative evaluations were done. Compared with the original image with metal artifacts and with the image corrected by using linear interpolation, both the numerical and the experimental phantom data demonstrated that the proposed algorithm reduced the metal artifact. In conclusion, the evaluation in this research showed that the proposed algorithm outperformed the interpolation based MAR algorithm. If an optimization and a stability evaluation of the proposed algorithm can be performed, the developed algorithm is expected to be an effective tool for eliminating metal artifacts even in commercial CT systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Hsieh, Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts and recent advances, 2nd edition, (SPIE Press, Bellingham, Wash, USA, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. M. Buzug, Computed Tomography from Photon Statistics to Modern Cone-Beam CT (Springer, Germany, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. F. Barrett and N. Keat, RadioGraphics 24, 1679 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. A. Kalender, R. Hebele and J. Ebersberger, Radiology 164, 576 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Zhao et al., IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 19, 1238 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Yazdia, L. Gingras and L. Beaulieu, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 64, 1224 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Bal and L. Spies, Med. Phys. 33, 2852 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging (IEEE Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. G. Feeman, The Mathematics of Medical Imaging; A Beginner’s Guide (Springer, Germany, 2010).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. O’Sullivan, Annals Stat. 23, 1267 (1995).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Levitan and G. T. Herman, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging MI-6, 185 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Shepp and Y. Vardi, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 1, 113 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Wang et al., IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging 15, 657 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. De Man et al., IEEE Transactions on Nuc. Sci. 47, 977 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. De Man et al., IEEE Trans. Med, Imaging 20, 999 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Larry and B. F. Logan, IEEE Trans. on Nuc. Sci. NS-21, 21 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Zhang et al., Comp. and Math. Meth. In Med. 2011, 1 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Online: http://www.phantomlab.com/products/Rando.php.

  19. J. Wei et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 5407 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Weickert and H. Scharr, Visual Comm. and Image Rep. 13, 103 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Kroon and C. H. Slump, IEEE-EMBS Benelux Chapter Symposium, Enschede (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.-J. Kroon et al., MICCAI 13, 221 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. E. Boas and D. Fleischmann, Radiology 256 894 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Zhang et al., Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol.Phys. 67, 924 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. J. H Veldkamp et al., Med. Phys. 37, 620 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Yu et al., Acad. Radiol. 14, 495 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. H. Ahn et al., Korean Phys. Soc. 64, 1220 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haewon Nam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Nam, H. & Lee, R. Development of a new metal artifact reduction algorithm by using an edge preserving method for CBCT imaging. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 180–188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.180

Keywords

Navigation