Abstract
Quality assurance (QA) for medical linear accelerators is indispensable for appropriate cancer treatment. Some international organizations and advanced Western countries have provided QA guidelines for linear accelerators. Currently, QA regulations for linear accelerators in Korean hospitals specify a system in which each hospital stipulates its independent hospital-based protocols for QA procedures (HP_QAPs) and conducts QA based on those HP_QAPs while regulatory authorities verify whether items under those HP_QAPs have been performed. However, because this regulatory method cannot guarantee the quality of universal treatment and QA items with tolerance criteria are different in many hospitals, the presentation of standardized QA items and tolerance criteria is essential. In this study, QA items in HP_QAPs from various hospitals and those presented by international organizations, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, the European Union, and the American Association of Physicist in Medicine, and by advanced Western countries, such as the USA, the UK, and Canada, were compared. Concordance rates between QA items for linear accelerators that were presented by the aforementioned organizations and those currently being implemented in Korean hospitals were shown to exhibit a daily QA of 50%, a weekly QA of 22%, a monthly QA of 43%, and an annual QA of 65%, and the overall concordance rates of all QA items were approximately 48%. In the comparison between QA items being implemented in Korean hospitals and those being implemented in advanced Western countries, concordance rates were shown to exhibit a daily QA of 50%, a weekly QA of 33%, a monthly QA of 60%, and an annual QA of 67%, and the overall concordance rates of all QA items were approximately 57%. The results of this study indicate that the HP_QAPs currently implemented by Korean hospitals as QA standards for linear accelerators used in radiation therapy do not meet international standards. If this problem is to be solved, national standardized QA items and procedures for linear accelerators need to be developed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. I. Thwaites, B. J. Mijnheer and J. A. Mills, J. Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students, edited by E. B. Podgorsak (IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2005).
G. J. Kutcher et al., Med. Phys. (Lancaster, PA) 21, 581 (1994).
E. E. Kleinn et al., Med. Phys. 36, 4197 (2009).
Z. Kolitsi, O. Dahl, R. V. Loon, J. Drouard, J. V. Dijk, B. I. Ruden, G. Chierego and J. C. Rosenwald, Radiother. Oncol. 45, 217 (1997).
D. Thwaites, P. Scalliet, J. W. Leer and J. Overgaard, Radiother. Oncol. 35, 61 (1995).
P. Dunscombe, C. Arsenault, J. P. Bissonnette, H. Johnson, G. Mawko and J. Seuntjens, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 8, 108 (2007).
A. Palmer, J. Kearton and O. Hayman, Bri. J. Rad. 85, e1067 (2012)
G. F. Acquah, and B. Schiestl, Intern. J. Sci.: Basic Appl. Res. (IJSBAR) 14, 354 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H., Jeong, S., Jo, Y. et al. Study of quality assurance regulations for linear accelerators in Korea: A comparison study between the current status in Korea and the international guidelines. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 67, 17–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.17
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.67.17