Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of the radiation shield effect in an abdominal CT scan

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study measured and compared the dose on the eyeballs and the thyroid with and without the use of a shield by applying the abdominal examination protocol used in an actual examination to a 64-channel computed tomography (CT) scan. A dummy phantom manufactured from acryl was used to measure the dose to the eyeballs and the thyroid of a patient during a thoraco-abdominal CT scan. The dose was measured using three dosimeters (optically-stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD), thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) and photoluminescence dosimeter (PLD)) attached to the surfaces of three parts (left and right eyeballs and thyroid) in a phantom with and without the use of a shield for the eyeballs and the thyroid. Two types of shields (1-mm barium shielding sheet and 1-mm tungsten shielding sheet) were used for the measurements. The goggles and the lead shield, which are normally used in clinical practice, were used to compare the shield ratios of the shields. According to the results of the measurements made by using the OSLD, the shield ratios of the barium and the tungsten sheets were in the range of 34–36%. The measurements made by using the TLD showed that the shield ratio of the barium sheet was 6.25% higher than that of the tungsten sheet. When the PLD was used for the measurement, the shield ratio of the barium sheet was 33.34%, which was equivalent to that of the tungsten sheet. These results confirmed that the cheap barium sheet had a better shielding effect than the expensive tungsten sheet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, NCRP 160, Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, 2009.

  2. D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall, N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 2277 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Brody, D. P. Frush, W. Huda and R. L. Brent, Pediatrics 120, 677 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. A. Mettler, P. W. Wiest, J. A. Locken and C. A. Kelsey, J. Radiol. Prot. 20, 353 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP 87, Managing Patient Dose in Computed Tomography, 2000.

  6. Ministry of Health and Welfare, GOVP1201015292, Guidelines for the recommended patient dose during a CT X-ray scan, 2009.

  7. S. C. Kim and M. H. Park, J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 33, 121 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. C. Kim and M. H. Park, J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 34, 141 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Ankjaergaard, M. Jain, P. C. Hansen and H. B. Nielsen, App. Phys. 43, 1 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. H. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry (John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. C. M. Sunta, R. N. Kulkarni, E. M. Yoshimura and E. Okuno, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 65, 21 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Y. C. Huang and S. M. Hsu, Radio-Photoluminescence Glass Dosimeter (RPLGD) (Advances in Cancer Therapy, InTech, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korea Food and Drug Administration, GOVP 1200951398, National Survey of Radiation Dose of Computed Tomography in Korea, 2008.

  14. American Association of Physicists Medicine, AAPM Report NO. 96, The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT, 2008.

  15. F. A. Mettler, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi and M. Mahesh, Radiology 248, 254 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. C. Kim, K. R. Dong and W. K. Chung, Ann. Nucl. Energy 47, 1 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. C. Kim, K. R. Dong and W. K. Chung, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 60, 165 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woon-Kwan Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SC., Kim, YJ., Lee, JS. et al. Comparative analysis of the radiation shield effect in an abdominal CT scan. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 64, 929–935 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.64.929

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.64.929

Keywords

Navigation