Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative analysis applied to contrast medium extravasation by using the computed-tomography number within the region of interest

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was carried out to present a method to analyze extravasation quantitatively by measuring the computed tomography (CT) number after determining the region of interest (ROI) in the CT images obtained from patients suspected of extravasation induced by contrast medium auto-injection. To achieve this, we divided the study subjects into a group of patients who incurred extravasation and a group of patients who underwent routine scans without incurring extravasation. The CT numbers at IV sites were obtained as reference values, and CT numbers at extravasation sites and hepatic portal veins, respectively, were obtained as relative values. Thereupon, the predicted time for extravasation (T EP ) and the predicted ratio for extravasation (R EP ) of an extravasation site were obtained and analyzed quantitatively. In the case of extravasation induced by a dual auto-injector, the values of the CT numbers were confirmed to be lower and the extravasation site to be enlarged when compared to the extravasation induced by a single autoinjector. This is because the physiological saline introduced after the injection of the contrast agent diluted the concentration of the extravasated contrast agent. Additionally, the T EP caused by the auto-injector was about 40 seconds, and we could perform a precise quantitative assessment of the site suspected of extravasation. In conclusion, the dual auto-injection method, despite its advantage of reducing the volume of contrast agent and improving the quality of images for patients with good vascular integrity, was judged to be likely to increase the risk of extravasation and aggravate outcomes for patients with poor vascular integrity by enlarging extravasation sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. T. Bae, Radiology 256, 32 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Hirai, S. Imakita, R. Tanaka, M. Higashi, T. Nishino, H. Naito and K. Ito, Acad. Radiol. 13, 694 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson and D. M. Delong, Radiology 243, 431 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Nakaura, S. Nakamura, N. Maruyama, Y. Funama, K. Awai, K. Harada, S. Uemura and Y. Yamashita, Radiology 264, 445 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. R. Becker, A. Vanzulli, C. Fink, D. de Faveri, S. Fedeli, R. Dore, P. Biondetti, A. Kuettner, M. Krix and G. Ascenti, Invest. Radiol. 46, 457 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. P. Federle. P. J. Chang, S. Confer and B. Ozgun, Radiology 206, 637 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. E. Jacobs, B. A. Birnbaum and C. P. Langlotz, Radiology 209, 411 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. H. Cohan, J. H. Ellis and W. L. Garner, Radiology 200, 593 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. H. Cohan, M. A. Bullard, J. H. Ellis, S. C. Jan, I. R. Francis, W. L. Garner and N. R. Dunnick, Acad. Radiol. 4, 711 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. T. Cochran, K. Bomyea and J. W. Sayre, Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 1385 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, NIST Report No. 5632 (1996).

  12. D. R. White and M. Fitzgerald, Health Phys. 33, 73 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Kusano, S. Minohara, T. Ishii, K. Fujimori, N. Ikeda, T. Kondo, H. Tubuku, A. Ito and H. Uchida, Igaku Butsuri 26, 163 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. S. Thomsen and S. K. Morcos, Eur. Radiol. 9, 738 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. F. Bellin, J. A. Jakobsen, I. Tomassin, H. S. Thomsen and S. K. Morcos, Eur. Radiol. 12, 2807 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. S. Benson, M. J. Sathy and R. B. Port, J. Orthop. Trauma 10, 433 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. C. Nelson, F. A. Anderson, B. A. Birnbaum, J. L. Chezmar and S. L. Glick, Radiology 209, 837 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. P. Dinkel, M. Fieger, J. Knüpffer, R. Moll and G. Schindler, Eur. Radiol. 8, 1608 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Kickuth, J. Kirchner, U. Laufer and D. Liermann, Eur. Radiol. 10, 1033 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Seung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JS., Im, IC., Kim, MJ. et al. Quantitative analysis applied to contrast medium extravasation by using the computed-tomography number within the region of interest. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 64, 476–482 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.64.476

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.64.476

Keywords

Navigation