Abstract
In nuclear medicine, the use of a pixelated semiconductor detector with cadmium telluride (CdTe) or cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe) is of growing interest for new devices. Especially, the spatial resolution can be improved by using a pixelated parallel-hole collimator with equal holes and pixel sizes based on the above-mentioned detector. High-absorption and high-stopping-power pixelated parallel-hole collimator materials are often chosen because of their good spatial resolution. Capturing more gamma rays, however, may result in decreased sensitivity with the same collimator geometric designs. Therefore, a trade-off between spatial resolution and sensitivity is very important in nuclear medicine imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare spatial resolutions using a pixelated semiconductor single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) system with lead, tungsten, gold, and depleted uranium pixelated parallel-hole collimators at equal sensitivity. We performed a simulation study of the PID 350 (Ajat Oy Ltd., Finland) CdTe pixelated semiconductor detector (pixel size: 0.35 × 0.35 mm2) by using a Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) simulation. Spatial resolutions were measured with different collimator materials at equivalent sensitivities. Additionally, hot-rod phantom images were acquired for each source-to-collimator distance by using a GATE simulation. At equivalent sensitivities, measured averages of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) using lead, tungsten, and gold were 4.32, 2.93, and 2.23% higher than that of depleted uranium, respectively. Furthermore, for the full width at tenth maximum (FWTM), measured averages when using lead, tungsten, and gold were 6.29, 4.10, and 2.65% higher than that of depleted uranium, respectively. Although, the spatial resolution showed little differences among the different pixelated parallel-hole collimator materials, lower absorption and stopping power materials such as lead and tungsten had relatively better characteristics at specific sensitivities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Abe et al., Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Img. 30, 805 (2003).
S. J. Park, C. L. Lee, H. M. Cho and H. J. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 60, 1145 (2012).
L. Verger et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51, 3111 (2004).
T. Kusayanagi and K. Ogawa, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec. M09-341, 3409 (2009).
K. Ogawa and M. Muraishi, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57, 17 (2010).
Y. J. Lee, S. J. Park, S. W. Lee, D. H. Kim, Y. S. Kim and H. J. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 62, 1317 (2013).
K. Vunckx, D. Beque, M. Defrise and J. Nuyts, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 27, 36 (2008).
T. Zeniya et al., Ann. Nucl. Med. 20, 409 (2006).
Y. J. Lee, H. J. Ryu, H. M. Cho, S. W. Lee, Y. N. Choi and H. J. Kim, JINST 8, C01044 (2013).
S. Yamamoto, H. Watabe, Y. Kanai, E. Shimosegawa and J. Hatazawa, Med. Phys. 39, 581 (2012).
M. F. Smith, R. J. Jaszczak, H. Wang and J. Li, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 44, 74 (1997).
D. Lazaro et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 271 (2004).
S. Jan et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 4543 (2004).
S. Staelens, D. Strul, G. Santin, S. Vandenberghe, M. Koole, Y. D. Asseler, I. Lemahieu and R. V. Walle, Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 3201 (2003).
D. Lazaro, Z. EI. Bitar, V. Breton, D. Hill and I. Buvat, Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 3739 (2005).
T. Takahashi and S. Watanabe, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 48, 950 (2001).
C. Scheiber, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 448, 513 (2000).
L. Verger, J. P. Bonnefoy, F. Glasser and P. O. Buffet, J. Electronic Mat. 26, 738 (1997).
S. Kimiaei and S. A. Larsson, Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 647 (1998).
H. Wieczorek and A. Goedicke, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 1102 (2006).
H. O. Anger, IEEE Trans. J. Nucl. Med. 5, 515 (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, YJ., Kim, DH. & Kim, HJ. The effect of high-resolution parallel-hole collimator materials with a pixelated semiconductor SPECT system at equivalent sensitivities: Monte Carlo simulation studies. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 64, 1055–1062 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.64.1055
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.64.1055