Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide clinical information on an oral cavity disease assessment that was conducted using a self-manufactured aid in a computed tomography (CT) oral examination. The study subjects included 30 patients, who were examined using a multi-detector CT (MDCT) 128-slice CT Scanner. Rapidia software was used for quantitative analysis, while a questionnaire and qualitative analysis were used to assess the convenience. The significance was evaluated using a Student’s t-test and a Wilcoxon signed rank test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. The convenience was evaluated by using a multiple response frequency analysis. The means and the standard deviations, which depended on use of the aid, were 2440.41 ± 4226.26 and 57443.86 ± 12445.91 respectively, the higher values being seen in the image assessment when the aid was used (p = 0.000). In a qualitative evaluation, the means and standard deviations were 2.52 ± 0.44 and 1.62 ± 0.22, respectively, the higher values being shown in the image assessment when the aid was used (p = 0.012). According to the convenience assessment that was conducted using a questionnaire, 80% of the respondents answered that they did not have any inconvenience when using the aid because the scores were 4 points or higher on the scale. In conclusion, the contrast increased when the aid, which enabled a clear identification of the anatomical structure, was inserted to examine the oral cavity. In particular, the patients considered the use of the aid to be convenient. Overall, the aid is recommended for use in a head/neck examination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. D. Stockham, Radiology 132, 721 (1979).
S. T. Schindera, L. Diedrichsen, H. C. Muller, O. Rusch, D. Marin, B. Schmidt, R. Raupach, P. Vock and Z. Szucs- Farkas, Radiology 260, 454 (2011).
H. Hu, H. D. He, W. D. Foley and S. H. Fox, Radiology 215, 55 (2000).
K. Taguchi and H. Aradate, Med. Phys. 25, 550 (1998).
O. R. Brook, S. Gourtsoyianni, A. Brook, A. Mahadevan, C. Wilcox and V. Raptopoulos, Radiology 263, 696 (2012).
H. Schoder, H. W. D. Yeung, M. Gonen, D. Kraus and S. M. Larson, Radiology 231, 65 (2004).
T. G. Flohr, S. Schaller, K. Stierstorfer, H. Bruder, B. M. Ohnesorge and U. Joseph Schoepf, Radiology 235, 756 (2005).
Z. Deak, J. M. Grimm, M. Treitl, L. L. Geyer, U. Linsenmaier, M. Korner, M. F. Reiser and S. Wirth, Radiology 266, 197 (2012).
A. D. King, G. M. K. Tse, A. T. Ahuja, E. H. Y. Yuen, A. C. Vlantis, E. W. H. To and A. C. van Hasselt, Radiology 230, 720 (2004).
G. W. Goerres, D. T. Schmid, B. Schuknecht and G. K. Eyrich, Radiology 237, 281 (2005).
J. J. Abrahams, Radiology 219, 334 (2001).
Z. Deák, J. M. Grimm, M. Treitl, L. L. Geyer, U. Linsenmaier, M. Körner, M. F. Reiser and S. Wirth, Radiology 266, 197 (2013).
D. A. Leswick, M. M. Hunt, S. T. Webster and D. A. Fladeland, Radiology 249, 572 (2008).
W. P. Shuman, K. R. Branch, J. M. May, L. M. Mitsumori, D. W. Lockhart, T. J. Dubinsky, B. H. Warren and J. H. Caldwell, Radiology 248, 431 (2008).
P. B. Noël, A. A. Fingerle, B. Renger, D. Münzel, E. J. Rummeny and M. Dobritz, Am. J. Roentgenol. 197, 1404 (2011).
J. Y. Kim, J. K. Kim, N. Kim and K. S. Cho, Radiology 246, 472 (2007).
L. Ash, T. N. Teknos, D. Gandhi, S. Patel and S. K. Mukherji, Radiology 251, 422 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, HJ., Goo, EH., Kim, SS. et al. Assessment of a CT image of the oral cavity with use of an aid focusing on a neck examination. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 63, 1838–1846 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.63.1838
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.63.1838