Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the planning target volume and liver volume dose based on the selected respiratory phase in respiratory-gated radiation therapy for a hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the changes in the planning target volume (PTV) and liver volume dose based on the respiratory phase to identify the optimal respiratory phase for respiratory-gated radiation therapy for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on the standardized procedure for respiratory-gated radiation therapy, we performed a 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation for 0 ∼ 90%, 30 ∼ 70%, and 40 ∼ 60% respiratory phases to assess the respiratory stability (S R ) and the defined PTV i for each respiratory phase i. A treatment plan was established, and the changes in the PTV i and dose volume of the liver were quantitatively analyzed. Most patients (91.5%) passed the respiratory stability test (S R = 0.111 ± 0.015). With standardized respiration training exercises, we were able to minimize the overall systematic error caused by irregular respiration. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis to identify the optimal respiratory phase revealed that when a short respiratory phase (40 ∼ 60%) was used, the changes in the PTV were concentrated inside the center line; thus, we were able to obtain both a PTV margin accounting for respiration and a uniform radiation dose within the PTV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. H. Kim, A. M. Panahon, M. Friedman and J. H. Webster, Clin. Radiol. 27, 449 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. S. Lawrence, R. J. Tesser and R. K. ten Haken, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 19, 1041 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Xi, L. Zhang, M. Z. Liu, X. W. Deng, X. Y. Huang and H. Liu, Med. Dosim. 36, 213 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. De Bari, N. Sellal and F. Mornex, Cancer Radiother. 15, 43 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. E. Rosenzweig et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 45, 81 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Bloemen-van Gurp, S. van der Meer, J. Hendry, J. Buijsen, P. Visser, D. Fontanarosa, M. Lachaine, G. Lammering and F. Verhaegen, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 85, 1096 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Depuydt et al., Radiother. Oncol. 98, 365 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Y. Wong, S. Y. Tung, A. W. Ng, F. A. Li and J. O. Leung, Med. Phys. 37, 4673 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. C. Kuo, Y. M. Chiu, W. P. Shih, H. W. Yu, C. W. Chen, P. F. Wong, W. C. Lin and J. J. Hwang, Radiat. Oncol. 6, 76 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Heath, J. Unkelbach and U. Oelfke, Med. Phys. 36, 3059 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. International Commission on Radiation Unit and Measurement, ICRU Report No. 62, Bethesda, MD, 1999.

  12. M. van Herk, P. Remeijer, C. Rasch and J. V. Lebesque, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 47, 1121 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Stroom and B. J. Heijmen, Radiother. Oncol. 64, 75 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. A. Dawson, C. J. McGinn, D. Normolle, R. K. Ten Haken, S. Walker, W. Ensminger and T. S. Lawrence, J. Clin. Oncol. 18, 2210 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Seong, H. C. Park, K. H. Han, D. Y. Lee, J. T. Lee, C. Y. Chon, Y. M. Moon and C. O. Suh, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 47, 1331 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. H. Cheng and A. T. Huang, Clinical radiation oncology: liver and hepatobiliary tract. In: C. A. Perez, L. W. Brady, E. C. Halperan and R. K. Schmidt-Urllich eds. Principles and practice of radiation oncology, 4th ed. (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2004), p. 1589.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Seong, K. H. Han, Y. N. Park, S. H. Nam, S. H. Kim, W. S. Keum and K. S. Kim, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 57, 282 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Jackson, R. K. Ten Haken, J. M. Robertson, M. L. Kessler, G. J. Kutcher and T. S. Lawrence, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 31, 883 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Niemierko and M. Goitein, Radiother. Oncol. 20, 166 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Seung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JS., Im, IC., Kang, SM. et al. Changes in the planning target volume and liver volume dose based on the selected respiratory phase in respiratory-gated radiation therapy for a hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 63, 1832–1837 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.63.1832

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.63.1832

Keywords

Navigation