Skip to main content
Log in

Monte Carlo modeling and validation of a proton treatment nozzle by using the Geant4 toolkit

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern commercial treatment planning systems for proton therapy use the pencil beam algorithm for calculating the absorbed dose. Although it is acceptable for clinical radiation treatment, the accuracy of this method is limited. Alternatively, the Monte Carlo method, which is relatively accurate in dose calculations, has been applied recently to proton therapy. To reduce the remaining uncertainty in proton therapy dose calculations, in the present study, we employed Monte Carlo simulations and the Geant4 simulation toolkit to develop a model for a of a proton treatment nozzle. The results from a Geant4-based medical application of the proton treatment nozzle were compared to the measured data. Simulations of the percentage depth dose profiles showed very good agreement within 1 mm in distal range and 3 mm in modulated width. Moreover, the lateral dose profiles showed good agreement within 3% in the central region of the field and within 10% in the penumbra regions. In this work, we proved that the Geant4 Monte Carlo model of a proton treatment nozzle could be used to the calculate proton dose distributions accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Brada, M. Pijls-Johannesma and D. D. Ruysscher, J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 956 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Hong, M. Goitein, M. Bucciolini, R. Comiskey, B. Gottschalk, S. Rosenthal, C. Serago and M. Urie, Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 1305 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Schaffner, E. Pedroni and A. Lomax, Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 27 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Newhauser, N. Koch, S. Hummel, M. Ziegler and U. Titt. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5229 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Paganetti, H. Jiang, K. Parodi, R. Slopsema and M. Engelsman, Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 4825 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Constantin, J. Perl, T. LoSasso, A. Salop, D. Whittum, A. Narula, M. Svatos and P. J. Keall, Med. Phys. 38, 4018 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Poon and F. Verhaegen, Med. Phys. 32, 1696 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. F. Carrier, L. Archambault, L. Beaulieu and R. Roy, Med. Phys. 31, 484 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Aso, A. Kimura, S. Kameoka, K. Murakami, T. Sasaki and T. Yamashita, Nucl. Sci. IEEE. Conf. Rec. 4, 2564 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Paganetti, H. Jiang and A. Trofimov, Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 983 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Paganetti, H. Jiang, S. Y. Lee and H. M. Kooy, Med. Phys. 31, 2107 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Shin, D. Kim, Y. K. Lim, S. Ahn, D. Shin, M. Yoon, S. Y. Park, S. B. Lee, J. Kwak and D. Son, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 56, 153 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Aso, A. Kimura, S. Tanaka, H. Yoshida, N. Kanematsu, T. Sasaki and T. Akagi, IEEE. Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52, 896 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, ICRT Report 49 (1993).

  17. P. Andreo, Phys. Med. Biol. 36, 861 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda MD, ICRT Report 24 (1976).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Se Byeong Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, DH., Kang, Y.N., Suh, TS. et al. Monte Carlo modeling and validation of a proton treatment nozzle by using the Geant4 toolkit. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 61, 1125–1130 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.1125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.1125

Keywords

Navigation