Abstract
Modern commercial treatment planning systems for proton therapy use the pencil beam algorithm for calculating the absorbed dose. Although it is acceptable for clinical radiation treatment, the accuracy of this method is limited. Alternatively, the Monte Carlo method, which is relatively accurate in dose calculations, has been applied recently to proton therapy. To reduce the remaining uncertainty in proton therapy dose calculations, in the present study, we employed Monte Carlo simulations and the Geant4 simulation toolkit to develop a model for a of a proton treatment nozzle. The results from a Geant4-based medical application of the proton treatment nozzle were compared to the measured data. Simulations of the percentage depth dose profiles showed very good agreement within 1 mm in distal range and 3 mm in modulated width. Moreover, the lateral dose profiles showed good agreement within 3% in the central region of the field and within 10% in the penumbra regions. In this work, we proved that the Geant4 Monte Carlo model of a proton treatment nozzle could be used to the calculate proton dose distributions accurately.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Brada, M. Pijls-Johannesma and D. D. Ruysscher, J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 956 (2007).
L. Hong, M. Goitein, M. Bucciolini, R. Comiskey, B. Gottschalk, S. Rosenthal, C. Serago and M. Urie, Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 1305 (1996).
B. Schaffner, E. Pedroni and A. Lomax, Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 27 (1999).
W. Newhauser, N. Koch, S. Hummel, M. Ziegler and U. Titt. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5229 (2005)
H. Paganetti, H. Jiang, K. Parodi, R. Slopsema and M. Engelsman, Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 4825 (2008).
J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
M. Constantin, J. Perl, T. LoSasso, A. Salop, D. Whittum, A. Narula, M. Svatos and P. J. Keall, Med. Phys. 38, 4018 (2011).
E. Poon and F. Verhaegen, Med. Phys. 32, 1696 (2006).
J. F. Carrier, L. Archambault, L. Beaulieu and R. Roy, Med. Phys. 31, 484 (2004).
T. Aso, A. Kimura, S. Kameoka, K. Murakami, T. Sasaki and T. Yamashita, Nucl. Sci. IEEE. Conf. Rec. 4, 2564 (2007).
H. Paganetti, H. Jiang and A. Trofimov, Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 983 (2005).
H. Paganetti, H. Jiang, S. Y. Lee and H. M. Kooy, Med. Phys. 31, 2107 (2004).
J. Shin, D. Kim, Y. K. Lim, S. Ahn, D. Shin, M. Yoon, S. Y. Park, S. B. Lee, J. Kwak and D. Son, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 56, 153 (2010).
T. Aso, A. Kimura, S. Tanaka, H. Yoshida, N. Kanematsu, T. Sasaki and T. Akagi, IEEE. Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52, 896 (2005).
International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, ICRT Report 49 (1993).
P. Andreo, Phys. Med. Biol. 36, 861 (1991).
International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda MD, ICRT Report 24 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, DH., Kang, Y.N., Suh, TS. et al. Monte Carlo modeling and validation of a proton treatment nozzle by using the Geant4 toolkit. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 61, 1125–1130 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.1125
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.1125