Skip to main content
Log in

How to device-independently generate states for which unambiguous state discrimination is impossible

  • Letters
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe how to device-independently generate a set of quantum states for which unambiguous state discrimination is not possible. First, we derive a formula that a certain non-signaling black box must satisfy. Then, we describe how to generate a set of quantum states. Devices for generating states and possible measurements on the states can be put into a black box. Because this black box is non-signaling, it satisfies the formula. Using the formula, we prove that unambiguous state discrimination is not possible for the generated states. Because we did not consider internal mechanisms but only outcomes, our argument is valid for any (imperfect) devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. J. A. Bergou, U. Herzog and M. Hillery, Lect. Notes Phys. 649, 417 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. I. D. Ivanovic, Phys. Lett. A 123, 257 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. A 126, 303 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Peres, Phys. Lett. A 128, 19 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Scarani, A. Acín, G. Ribordy and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057901 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Chefles, Phys. Lett. A 239, 339 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 273 (2004).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Barrett, L. Hardy and A. Kent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Acín, N. Gisin and L. Masanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 010503 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio and V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Herbert, Found. Phys. 12, 1171 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Gisin, Phys. Letts. A 242, 1 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. W-Y. Hwang, Phys. Rev. A 71, 062315 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Bae, W-Y. Hwang and Y-D. Han, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 170403 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Y-D. Han, J. Bae, X-B. Wang and W-Y. Hwang, Phys. Rev. A 82, 062318 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1991).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. W-Y. Hwang, X-B. Wang, K. Matsumoto, J. Kim and H-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012302 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Y. Hwang, I. G. Koh and Y. D. Han, Phys. Lett. 244, 489 (1998).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Koashi and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 057902 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Won-Young Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, WY. How to device-independently generate states for which unambiguous state discrimination is impossible. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 60, 1837–1839 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.60.1837

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.60.1837

Keywords

Navigation