Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 71, Issue 2, pp 77–81 | Cite as

Effect of quark spins to the hadron distributions for chiral magnetic wave in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions



Topological fluctuation of the gluon field in quantum chromodynamics modifies the vacuum structure, and causes various chiral anomalies. In the strong magnetic field generated by semi-central heavy-ion collisions, the axial and vector density fluctuations propagate along the external magnetic field, called the chiral magnetic wave. Up to now the investigation of the various chiral anomalies in heavy ion collisions has been focussed on the charge distribution in the transverse plane. However, this paper points out that the information on the charge distribution is not enough and the spin effect should also be taken into account. Considering the charge and spin distributions together, π± with spin 0 are not proper particle species to study the chiral anomalies, as the signal may be significantly suppressed as one of the constituent (anti)quarks should come from background to form the pseudoscalar states. It is, therefore, necessary to analyze explicitly the vector mesons with spin 1 (K (892)) and baryons with spin 3/2 (Δ++(1232), Σ (1385) and Ω). If the chiral anomaly effects exist, the elliptic flow parameter is expected to be larger for negative particles for each particle species.


Spin Chirality Magnetic field Parity Relativistic heavy ion collision 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    D. E. Kharzeev, arXiv:1312.3348.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin and G. Wang, arXiv:1511.04050.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Schäfer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. E. Kharzeev and E. M. Levin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 242001 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. E. Kharzeev and H. U. Yee, Phys. Rev. D 83, 085007 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    L. Adamczyk et al., STAR Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 252302 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    B. Abelev et al., ALICE Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012301 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    V. Khachatryan et al., CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 122301 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    V. Khachatryan et al., CMS Collaboration, CMS PAS HIN-16-017.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Burnier, D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 052303 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Petersen, R. L. Placa and S. A. Bass, J. Phys. G 39, 055102 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Alver and G. Roland, Phys. Rev. C 82, 039903 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Bzdak and P. Bozek, Phys. Lett. B 726, 239 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    C. Patrignani et al., Particle Data Group, Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 70, 057901 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKorea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations