Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 806–810 | Cite as

Excitonic valley polarization and coherence in few-layer MoS2

Article

Abstract

We study the excitonic valley polarization and coherence in few-layer MoS2 by using circular- and linear-polarization-resolved photoluminescence. The valley polarization is largest in monolayer MoS2 and decreases with increasing number of layers or temperature. Contrary to the valley polarization, the linear polarization is negligibly small in monolayer MoS2 and increases with increasing number of layers or temperature. The temperature-dependent valley depolarization can be explained by the exciton center-of-mass momentum-dependent electron-hole exchange interaction. The valley decoherence in few-layer MoS2 is much faster than the valley depolarization at low temperature and is steady against increasing temperature or photoexcitation intensity, indicating that the decoherence process does not involve phonon or carrier-carrier scattering. The dominant valley decoherence has a pure dephasing origin and cannot be explained by the valley-depolarizing e-h exchange interaction.

Keywords

Valleytronics Valley polarization Valley coherence Photoluminescence MoS2 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. I. Dyakonov, Physica E 35, 246 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. E. Nebel, Nature Mat. 12, 690 (2013).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Xiao, W. Yao and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    W. Yao, D. Xiao and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B 77, 235406 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao and X. Cui, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan and T. F. Heinz, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C. Y. Chim, G. Galli and F. Wang, Nano Lett. 10, 1271 (2010).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan and T. F. Heinz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Tongay, J. Zhou, C. Ataca, K. Lo, T. S. Matthews, J. Li, J. C. Grossman and J. Wu, Nano Lett. 12, 5576 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Cao et al., Nat. Commun. 3, 887 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Xiao D, G. B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Q. Wang, S. Ge, X. Li, J. Qiu, Y. Ji, J. Feng and D. Sun, ACS Nano 7, 11087 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    N. Kumar, Q. Cui, F. Ceballos, D. He, Y. Wang and H. Zhao, Phys. Rev. B 89, 125427 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Lagarde, L. Bouet, X. Marie, C. R. Zhu, B. L. Liu, T. Amand, P. H. Tan and B. Urbaszek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 047401 (2014).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. R. Zhu, K. Zhang, M. Glazov, B. Urbaszek, T. Amand, Z.W. Ji, B. L. Liu and X. Marie, Phys. Rev. B 90, 161302(R) (2014).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park and P. L. McEuen, Science 344, 1489 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. M. Jones et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 634 (2013).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    B. Zhu, H. Zeng, J. Dai, Z. Gong and X. Cui, PNAS 116, 11606 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Wu et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 148 (2013).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    G. Kioseoglou, A. T. Hanbicki, M. Currie, A. L. Friedman, D. Gunlycke and B. T. Jonker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 221907 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Yu and M. W. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 89, 205303 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Physics, College of Applied ScienceKyung Hee UniversityYonginKorea

Personalised recommendations