Ansatz of leptonic mixing: The alliance of bi-maximal mixing with a single-angle rotation
- 13 Downloads
Abstract
We introduce an ansatz of the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix that consists of specific types of transformations. Bi-maximal mixing is taken for the neutrino masses while a single-angle rotation in the 1–2 block is taken for the charged lepton masses. Motivated by the implications of the recent results on neutrino oscillations, θ 23 in the first octant and non-zero θ 13 are predicted by the ansatz. Three physical mixing angles are expressed in terms of a single variable, the 1–2 angle of charged leptons, so that a simple relation among the angles has been obtained: tan θ 13 = \(\sqrt 2 \)(sin θ 23 − sin θ 12). Finally a model of the inverted hierarchy that can produce the given ansatz is proposed.
Keywords
Neutrino mass Mixing angles Flavor symmetryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]K. Abe et al. [T2K Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 041801 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]P. Adamson et al. [MINOS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181802 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]Y. Abe et al. [DOUBLE-CHOOZ Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 131801 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]F. P. An et al. [DAYA-BAY Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]J. K. Ahn et al. [RENO Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]J. Beringer et al. [Particle Data Group Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012).ADSGoogle Scholar
- [7]F. Capozzi, G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino and A. Palazzo, Phys. Rev. D 89, 093018 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]D. V. Forero, M. Tortola and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 86, 073012 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 530, 167 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]P. F. Harrison and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 557, 76 (2003).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [11]D. Meloni, S. Morisi and E. Peinado, J. Phys. G 38, 015003 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]R. Z. Yang and H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 700, 316 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]S. Morisi and E. Peinado, Phys. Lett. B 701, 451 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]N. W. Park, K. H. Nam and K. Siyeon, Phys. Rev. D 83, 056013 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]S. Morisi, K. M. Patel and E. Peinado, Phys. Rev. D 84, 053002 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]X. Chu, M. Dhen and T. Hambye, JHEP 1111, 106 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]P. V. Dong, H. N. Long, C. H. Nam and V. V. Vien, Phys. Rev. D 85, 053001 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]K. Siyeon, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2081 (2012); arXiv: 1203.1593 [hep-ph].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]C. Duarah, A. Das and N. N. Singh, arXiv:1207.5225 [hep-ph].Google Scholar
- [20]E. Ma, arXiv:hep-ph/0409075.Google Scholar
- [21]S. L. Chen, M. Frigerio and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 70, 073008 (2004) [Erratum-ibid. D 70, 079905 (2004)].Google Scholar
- [22]J. Kubo, H. Okada and F. Sakamaki, Phys. Rev. D 70, 036007 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar