Electron-spin-resonance spectra and ferroelectricity of BaTi1−x FexO3
- 109 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
We have studied electron-spin-resonance (ESR) spectra and the ferroelectricity of polycrystalline BaTi1−x Fe x O3 ceramics. The features of the ESR spectra recorded at room temperature reveal that the samples with x = 0.02 − 0.06 are paramagnetic while the others are ferromagnetic. These results are in good agreement with those reported previously for magnetization measurements. In our case, the ESR spectra are mainly related to dipole-dipole interactions taking place between Fe3+ and Fe4+ ions, which are co-present in the samples. Electrical investigations of the polarization reveal room-temperature P - E hysteresis loops for all the samples. Both the remnant polarization (P r ) and the ferroelectric P - E loop decrease with increasing Fe content (x) in BaTi1−x Fe x O3, indicating a decrease in the ferroelectricity. This is ascribed to an incorporation of Fe dopants into the tetragonal BaTiO3 lattice and to a structural phase separation.
Keywords
Fe-doped BaTiO3 Magnetic resonance FerroelectricityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]K. J. Choi, M. Biegalski, Y. L. Li, A. Sharan, J. Schubert, R. Uecker, P. Reiche, Y. B. Chen, X. Q. Pan, V. Gopalan, L. O. Chen, D. G. Schlom, and C. B. Eom, Science 306, 1005 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]W. Eisenstein, N. D. Mother and J. F Scott, Nature 442, 759 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]M. Guo, H. M. Deng, P. X. Yang and J. H. Chu, Mater. Lett. 63, 1535 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]P. X. Yang, M. R. Shi, S. M. Qin and H. M. Deng, Mater. Lett. 61, 2687 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]P. X. Yang, J. F. Xu, J. Ballato, R. W. Schwartz and D. L. Carroll, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3394 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]F. Jona and G. Shirane, Ferroelectric Crystals (Dover Publications, 1993).Google Scholar
- [7]X. X. Liu, Microanalyses of Ferroelectric Properties of BaTiO 3 (Universität-Gesamthochschule Wuppertal, Wuppertal 2001).Google Scholar
- [8]D. Khomskii, Phys. 2, 20 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]P. D. Araujo, J. F. Scott and G. W. Taylor, In Ferroelectric Thin Films: Synthesis and Basic Properties (Gordon and Breach Science Publisher, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
- [10]D. Damjanovic, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 1267 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]N. V. Dang, T. D. Thanh, L. V. Hong, V. D. Lam and T. L. Phan, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 043914 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]G. B. Han, S. J. Hu, S. S. Yan, S. S. Kang and L. M. Mei, Phys. Stat. Sol. Rapid Res. Lett. 4, 236 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]S. Qin, D. Liu, Z. Zuo, Y. Sang, X. Zhang, F. Zheng, Hong Liu and X. G. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 238 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]H. M. Nguyen, N. V. Dang, P. Y. Chuang, T. D. Thanh, C. W. Hu, T. Y. Chen, V. D. Lam, C. H. Lee and L. V. Hong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 201501 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]M. Ikeya, New Applications of Electron Spin Resonance (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).Google Scholar
- [16]S. Ray, P. Mahadevan, S. Mandal, S. R. Krishnakumar, C. S. Kuroda, T. Sasaki, T. Taniyama and M. Itoh, Phys. Rev. B 77, 104416 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]F. Lin, D. Jiang, X. Ma and W. Shi, J. Magn. Mater. 320, 691 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]C. W. Nan, M. I. Bichurin, S. X. Dong and D. Vieland, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 031101 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]S. Mori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 28, 44 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]R. Maier and J. L. Cohn, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 5429 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]P. Yang, J. S. Zhu, J. Y. Lee and H. Y. Lee, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 21, S92 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]Y. Shuai, S. Zhou, D. Burger, H. Reuther, I. Skorupa, V. John and H. Schmidt, Apply. Phys. 109, 084105 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]K. A. Griffin, A. B. Pakhomov, C. M. Wang, S. M. Heald and K. M. Krisman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 157204 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar