Skip to main content
Log in

Shakedown criterion employing actual residual stress field and its application in numerical shakedown analysis

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction of the static admissible residual stress field and searching the optimal field are key tasks in the shakedown analysis methods applying the static theorem. These methods always meet dimension obstacles when dealing with complex problems. In this paper, a novel shakedown criterion is proposed employing actual residual stress field based on the static shakedown theorem. The actual residual stress field used here is produced under a specified load path, which is a sequence of proportional loading and unloading from zero to all the vertices of the given load domain. This ensures that the shakedown behavior in the whole load domain can be determined based on the theorem proposed by König. The shakedown criterion is then implemented in numerical shakedown analysis. The actual residual stress fields are calculated by incremental finite element elastic-plastic analysis technique for finite deformation under the specified load path with different load levels. The shakedown behavior and the shakedown limit load are determined according to the proposed criterion. The validation of the criterion is performed by a benchmark shakedown example, which is a square plate with a central hole under biaxial loading. The results are consistent with existing results in the literatures and are validated by full cyclic elastic-plastic finite element analysis. The numerical shakedown analysis applying the proposed criterion avoids processing dimension obstacles and performing full cyclic elastic-plastic analysis under arbitrary load paths which should be accounted for appearing. The effect of material model and geometric changes on shakedown behavior can be considered conveniently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KÖNIG J A. Shakedown of elastic-plastic structures[M]. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MELAN E. The Mises-Hencky’s stress distribution of continuum under variable load[C]//Conference Report of the Vienna Academy of Science, Mathematic Natural Scientific Division, Section IIa, 1938, 147: 73–87. (in German)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. KOITER, W T. General theorems for elastoplastic solids[M]//KOITER Sneddon J N, HILL R, ed. Progress in Solid Mechanics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  4. POLIZZOTTO C. On the conditions to prevent plastic shakedown: part I–theory; part II–the plastic shakedown limit load[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME, 1993, 60: 15–25, 318–323.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. POLIZZOTTO C. Shakedown theorems for elastic–plastic solids in the framework of gradient plasticity[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2008, 24(2): 218–241.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. POLIZZOTTO C. Shakedown analysis for a class of strengthening materials within the framework of gradient plasticity[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2010, 26(7): 1050–1069.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. STEIN E, ZHANG G, KÖNIG J A. Shakedown with nonlinear strain hardening including structural computation using finite element method[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 1992, 8: 1–31.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. PHAM D. Shakedown theory for elastoplastic kinematic hardening bodies[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2007, 23: 1240–1259.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. SESHADRI R. The generalized local stress strain (GLOSS) analysis-theory and applications[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1991, 113: 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. HAMILTON R, BOYLE J T, SHI J, et al. Shakedown load bounds by elastic finite element analysis[C]//Proc. ASME-PVP Division, New York, USA, 1996, 343: 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. PONTER A R S, CARTER K F. Shakedown state simulation techniques based on linear elastic solutions[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics Engineering, 1997, 140: 259–279.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. MOHAMED A I, MEGAHED M M, BAYOUMI L S, et al. Applications of iterative elastic techniques for elastic-plastic analysis of pressure vessels[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1999, 121: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CHEN Haofeng, PONTER A R. Shakedown and limit analyses for 3-D structures using the linear matching method[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2001, 78: 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CHEN Shenshen, LIU Yinghua, LI Jun, et al. Performance of the MLPG method for static shakedown analysis for bounded kinematic hardening structures[J]. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2011, 30(2): 183–194.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. LI Tianbai, CHEN Haofeng, CHEN Weihang, et al. On the shakedown analysis of welded pipes[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2011, 88(8–9): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. BOUSSHINE L, CHAABA A, SAXCE G D. A new approach to shakedown analysis for non-standard elastoplastic material by the bipotential[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2003, 19: 583–598.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. MAGOARIEC H, BOURGEOIS S, DÉBORDES O. Elastoplastic shakedown of 3D periodic heterogeneous media: a direct numerical approach[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2004, 20(8–9): 1655–1675.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. CORRADI L, ZAVELANI A. A linear programming approach to shakedown analysis of structures[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3: 37–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. CHEN Haofeng, URE J, LI Tianbai, et al. Shakedown and limit analysis of 90° pipe bends under internal pressure, cyclic in-plane bending and cyclic thermal loading[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2011, 88(5–7): 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. SIMON J W, WEICHERT D. Shakedown analysis of engineering structures with limited kinematical hardening[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(15–16): 2177–2186.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. MUSCAT M, HAMILTON R, BOYLE J T. Shakedown analysis for complex loading using superposition[J]. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 2002, 37(5): 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. HASBROUCQ S, OUESLATI A, SAXCé de G. Inelastic responses of a two-bar system with temperature-dependent elastic modulus under cyclic thermo mechanical loadings[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2010, 47(14–15): 1924–1932.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. ABDALLA H F, MEGAHED M M, YOUNAN M Y. A simplified technique for shakedown limit load determination[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237(12–13): 1231–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ABDALLA H F, MEGAHED M M, MOHAMMAD M, et al. A simplified technique for shakedown limit load determination of a large square plate with a small central hole under cyclic biaxial loading[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2011, 241(3): 657–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. KORBA A G, MEGAHED M M, ABDALLA H F, et al. Shakedown analysis of 90-degree mitred pipe bends[J]. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2013, 40: 158–165.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. SPILIOPOULOS K V, PANAGIOTOU K D. A direct method to predict cyclic steady states of elastoplastic structures[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 223: 186–198.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. SPILIOPOULOS K V, PANAGIOTOU K D. A residual stress decomposition based method for the shakedown analysis of structures[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 276: 410–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. SPITERI P, HO S, LEE Y-L. Assessment of bending fatigue limit for crankshaft sections with inclusion of residual stresses[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2007, 29(2): 318–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. WANG J, WANG Y, HUO Z. Finite element residual stress analysis of planetary gear tooth[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2013: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  30. WANG X, CHEN T, LI S, et al. The simulation and experimental study of residual stress based on thermo-mechanical model of GCr15[J]. Advances in Machining and Manufacturing Technology Xii: Key Engineering Materials, 2014, 589–590: 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  31. MARTIN J B. Plasticity: fundamentals and general results[M]. MIT, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ASME. Boiler and pressure vessel code[S]. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1986.

  33. STEIN E, HUANG Y. An analytical method for shakedown problems with linear kinematic hardening materials[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1994, 31(18): 2433–2444.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. ZEMAN J L, RAUSCHER F Schindler. Pressure vessel design—the direct route[M]. Elsevier, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miao Jin.

Additional information

Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2013ZX04003031), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51475408), Hebei Provincial College Innovation Team Leader Training Program of China (Grant No. LJRC012), and Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. E2012203045)

ZOU Zongyuan, born in 1986, is currently a PhD candidate at Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging & Stamping Technology and Science of Ministry of Education, Yanshan University, China. She received her bachelor degree from Yanshan University, China, in 2009. Her main research interest is strength analysis for the frame of hydraulic press.

GUO Baofeng, born in 1958, is currently a professor at Yanshan University, China. He received his PhD degree from Yanshan University, China, in 2001. His research interests include analysis and design for the frame of hydraulic press and stamping process.

LI Yinxiao, born in 1985, is currently an assistant engineer at Chinese 91315 People's Liberation Army Troops, PR China. He received his bachelor’s degree from Yanshan University, China, in 2009.

JIN Miao, born in 1968, is currently a professor at Yanshan University, China. He received his PhD degree from Yanshan University, China, in 2000. His research interests include analysis and design for the frame of hydraulic press and forging process.

ZHAO Shiyan, born in 1978, is currently an associate professor at Yanshan University, China. He received his PhD degree from Yanshan University, China, in 2009. His research interests include analysis and design for the frame of hydraulic press.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, Z., Guo, B., Li, Y. et al. Shakedown criterion employing actual residual stress field and its application in numerical shakedown analysis. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 28, 919–927 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2015.0727.102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2015.0727.102

Keywords

Navigation