Advertisement

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 249–257 | Cite as

Operation and force analysis of the guide wire in a minimally invasive vascular interventional surgery robot system

  • Xue Yang
  • Hongbo WangEmail author
  • Li Sun
  • Hongnian Yu
Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

To develop a robot system for minimally invasive surgery is significant, however the existing minimally invasive surgery robots are not applicable in practical operations, due to their limited functioning and weaker perception. A novel wire feeder is proposed for minimally invasive vascular interventional surgery. It is used for assisting surgeons in delivering a guide wire, balloon and stenting into a specific lesion location. By contrasting those existing wire feeders, the motion methods for delivering and rotating the guide wire in blood vessel are described, and their mechanical realization is presented. A new resistant force detecting method is given in details. The change of the resistance force can help the operator feel the block or embolism existing in front of the guide wire. The driving torque for rotating the guide wire is developed at different positions. Using the CT reconstruction image and extracted vessel paths, the path equation of the blood vessel is obtained. Combining the shapes of the guide wire outside the blood vessel, the whole bending equation of the guide wire is obtained. That is a risk criterion in the delivering process. This process can make operations safer and man-machine interaction more reliable. A novel surgery robot for feeding guide wire is designed, and a risk criterion for the system is given.

Keywords

minimally invasive wire feeder force analysis moment of inertia risk criterion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ZENG Bingfang. Minimally invasive surgery in fracture management[J]. Chinese Medical, 2008, 121: 1349. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    GARCÍA-GARCÍA H M, TSUCHIDA K, MEULENBRUG H, et al. Magnetic navigation in a coronary phantom: experimental results [J]. Eurointervention, 2005, 1(3): 321–328.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    STEVEN D, SERVATIUS H, ROSTOCK T, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation [J]. Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2010, 21(1): 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    POLYGERINOS P, SCHAEFFTER T, SENEVIRATNE L, et al. Measuring tip and side forces of a novel catheter prototype: a feasibility study[C]//2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St Louis, Missouri, USA, Oct. 11–15, 2009: 966–971.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    HE Guangming. New Exploration on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases[C]//Acupuncture Association of Chongqing Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2009-11.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    ANDREW B, GOLDSTONE Y, JOSEPH Woo. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of valvular heart disease original research[J]. Article Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014, 26(1): 36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    KAZANZIDES P, FIEHTINGER G, HAGER G D, et a1. Surgical and Interventional robotics-core concepts, technology, and design [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2008, 15(2): 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    LU Wangsheng, LIU Da, TIAN Zengmin, et al. The analysis of key technologies of intravascular intervention surgical robot[J]. Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research, 2009, 28(4): 303–306. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    ZHENG Zhanchuan, YANG Wenping, CHEN Xiaohui. The application of DSA in intervention surgery[J]. Journal of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, 2009, 31(4): 683–684. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    CORRADO L, CIRO R, ULIANO M. History of minimally invasive thoracic and cardiac surgery[M]. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 3–23Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    KNIGHT B, AYERS G M, COHEN T J. Robotic positioning of standard electrophysiology catheters: a novel approach to catheter robotics[J]. Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 2008, 20(5): 250–253.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    KANAGARATNAM P, KOA-WING M, WALLACE D T, et al. Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath[J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2008, 21(1): 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    GRANADA J F, DELGADO J A, URIBE M P, et al. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system[J]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2011, 4(4): 460–465.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    NGUYEN B L, MERINO J L, GANG E S. Remote navigation for ablation procedures—a new step forward in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias[J]. European Cardiology, 2010, 6(3): 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    PAYNE C J, RAFII-TARI H, YANG G Z. A force feedback system for endovascular catheterisation[C]//2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, 2012: 1298–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    GUO Shuxiang, XIAO Nan, GAO Baofeng. Internet based remote control for a robotic catheter manipulating system[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, Kobe, Japan, 2012: 540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    WANG Tianmiao, ZHANG Dapeng, LIU Da. Remote controlled vascular interventional surgery robot[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2010, 6: 194–201.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    FU Yili, GAO Anzhu, LIU Hao, et al. Master-slave intervention of robotic catheter system[J]. Robot, 2011, 33(5): 579–591. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    ZHENG Xiaoqian. Design and experimental research of minimally invasive vascular interventional surgery robot[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2011. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    ALLISON M O. Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery[J]. Curr Opin Urol. January 2009, 19(1): 102–107.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    JAESOON C, JUN W P, DONG J K, et al. Lapabot: A compact telesurgical robot system for minimally invasive surgery: Part I. System description[J]. Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2012, 21: 188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    CHARLOTTE T, RACHEL K, MATTHEW G. Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27: 2253–2257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    ANTON S R, STEPHEN O C M, KOPIETZ D O. Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26: 2117–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    PETER H, ABRAHAMS R T, HUTCHINGS S C. Marks Jr. McMinn’s Colour Atlas of Human Anatomy[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parallel Robot and Mechatronic System Laboratory of Hebei ProvinceYanshan UniversityQinhuangdaoChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging & Stamping Technology and Science of Ministry of EducationYanshan UniversityQinhuangdaoChina
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of JinanJinanChina
  4. 4.Faculty of Science and TechnologyBournemouth UniversityDorsetUK

Personalised recommendations