Skip to main content
Log in

Detached-eddy simulation for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS), such as the original k-ω two-equation closures, have been very popular in providing good prediction for a wide variety of flows with presently available computational resource. But for cavitating flows, the above equations noticeably over-predict turbulent production and hence effective viscosity. In this paper, the detached eddy simulation (DES) method for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows is investigated. To assess the state-of-the-art of computational capabilities, different turbulence models including the widely used RANS model and DES model are conducted. Firstly, in order to investigate the grid dependency in computations, different grid sizes are adopted in the computation. Furthermore, the credibility of DES model is supported by the unsteady cavitating flows over a 2D hydrofoil. The results show that the DES model can effectively reduce the eddy viscosities. From the experimental validations regarding the force analysis, frequency and the unsteady cavity visualizations, more favorable agreement with experimental visualizations and measurements are obtained by DES model. DES model is better able to capture unsteady phenomena including cavity length and the resulting hydrodynamic characteristics, reproduces the time-averaged velocity quantitatively around the hydrofoil, and yields more acceptable and unsteady dynamics features. The DES model has shown to be effective in improving the overall predictive capability of unsteady cavitating flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KNAPP R T, DAILY J W, HAMMITT F G. Cavitation[M].New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WANG Fujun, ZHANG Ling, LI Yaojun, et al. Some key issues of unsteady turbulence numerical simulation in axial-flow pump[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 44(8): 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. KUBOTA A, KATO H, YAMAGUCHI H. A new modeling of cavitating flows: a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section[J]. J. Fluid Mech., 1992, 240: 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. MERKLE C L, FENG J Z, BUELOW P E O. Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation[C/CD]//Proc. Third International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, 1998.

  5. KUNZ R F, BOGER D A, STINEBRING D R A. A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation predition[J]. Comput. Fluid, 2000, 29: 849–875.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. SINGHAL A K, ATHAVALE M M. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002, 124: 617–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. COUTIER-DELGOSHA O, FORTES-PATELLA R, REBOUND J L. Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavition[J]. J. Fluids Eng., 2003, 125: 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. JOHANSEN S T, WU J, SHYY W. Filter-based unsteady RANS computations[J]. Int. J.Heat and Fluid Flow, 2004, 25(1): 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SPALART P R, JOU W H, STRELETS M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach, advances in DNS/LES[C]//First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Greyden, Columbus, OH, 1997, 2001: 102–114.

  10. GEORGE S. Constantinescu. LES and DES investigations of turbulent flow over a sphere[G]. AIAA 2000-0540.

  11. STRELETS M. Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows[G]. AIAA 2001-0879.

  12. SZYDLOWSKI J, COSTES M. Simulation of flow around a NACA0015 airfoil for static and dynamics stall configurations using RANS and DES[C]//AHS International 4th Decennial Specialists Conference on Aeromechanics, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2004: 223–238.

  13. MICHAEL P Kunzel, JULES W Lindau, LEONARD J Peltier, et al. Detached-eddy simulations for cavitating flows[G]. AIAA 2007-4098.

  14. WANG G Y, SENOCAK I, SHYY W. Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(6): 551–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. WANG G, ZHANG B, HUANG B, et al. Unsteady dynamics of cloudy cavitating flows around a hydrofoil[C/CD]//Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation, August 17-22, 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, CAV2009, Paper No. 9.

  16. FLORIAN R, MENTER. Zonal two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flow[G]. AIAA-93-2906, 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyu Wang.

Additional information

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11172040)

HUANG Biao, born in 1985, is currently a PhD candidate at Beijing Institute of Technology, China. His research interests include the numerical simulation of multiphase cavitating flows.

WANG Guoyu, born in 1961, is currently a professor at Beijing Institute of Technology, China. He received his PhD degree from Tohoku University, Japan, in 1999. His research interests include the fluid machinery and engineering and the mechanism of cavitation and supercavitation flow.

YU Zhiyi, born in 1975, is currently an associate professor at Beijing Institute of Technology, China. He received his PhD degree from Tsinghua University, China, in 2005. His research interests include numerical simulation of multiphase flows.

SHI Shuguo, born in 1983, is currently a PhD candidate at Beijing Institute of Technology, China. Her research interests include the numerical simulation of multiphase cavitating flows.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, B., Wang, G., Yu, Z. et al. Detached-eddy simulation for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 25, 484–490 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2012.03.484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2012.03.484

Key words

Navigation